The early development of face processing — What makes faces special?

In the present article we review behavioral and neurophysiological studies on face processing in adults and in early development. From the existing empirical and theoretical literature we derive three aspects that distinguish face processing from the processing of other visual object categories. Each of these aspects is discussed from a developmental perspective. First, faces are recognized and represented at the individual level rather than at the basic level. Second, humans typically acquire extensive expertise in individuating faces from early on in development. And third, more than other objects, faces are processed holistically. There is a quantitative difference in the amount of visual experience for faces and other object categories in that the amount of expertise typically acquired for faces is greater than that for other object categories. In addition, we discuss possible qualitative differences in experience for faces and objects. For instance, there is evidence for a sensitive period in infancy for building up a holistic face representation and for perceptual narrowing for faces of one’s own species and race. We conclude our literature review with questions for future research, for instance, regarding the exact relationship between behavioral and neuronal markers of face processing across development.

[1]  Éva M. Bankó,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of visual adaptation to faces and body parts in humans. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Rapid adaptation of the m170 response: importance of face parts. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Stimulus inversion and the responses of face and object-sensitive cortical areas. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[4]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Eyes first! Eye processing develops before face processing in children , 2001, Neuroreport.

[5]  T. Gliga,et al.  Development of a view-invariant representation of the human head , 2007, Cognition.

[6]  O. Pascalis,et al.  Categorization, categorical perception, and asymmetry in infants' representation of face race. , 2009, Developmental science.

[7]  D. Maurer,et al.  Infants' perception of natural and distorted arrangements of a schematic face. , 1981, Child development.

[8]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Does physical interstimulus variance account for early electrophysiological face sensitive responses in the human brain? Ten lessons on the N170 , 2008, NeuroImage.

[9]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  Perceptual Other-Race Training Reduces Implicit Racial Bias , 2009, PloS one.

[10]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Computational Modeling of Face Recognition Based on Psychophysical Experiments , 2004 .

[11]  J. Tanaka,et al.  A Neural Basis for Expert Object Recognition , 2001, Psychological science.

[12]  C. Nelson,et al.  Featural and Configural Face Processing in Adults and Infants: A Behavioral and Electrophysiological Investigation , 2006, Perception.

[13]  Christine Deruelle,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetries in visual pattern processing in infancy , 1991, Brain and Cognition.

[14]  R. Rafal,et al.  Neural fate of seen and unseen faces in visuospatial neglect: A combined event-related functional MRI and event-related potential study , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Race-Specific Perceptual Discrimination Improvement Following Short Individuation Training With Faces , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[16]  V. Goffaux,et al.  Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect: an event-related potentials study , 1999, Biological Psychology.

[17]  O. Pascalis,et al.  Development of face processing. , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[18]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[19]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Comparing neural correlates of configural processing in faces and objects: An ERP study of the Thatcher illusion , 2006, NeuroImage.

[20]  Teodora Gliga,et al.  Structural Encoding of Body and Face in Human Infants and Adults , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[21]  Garrison W. Cottrell,et al.  The roles of visual expertise and visual input in the face inversion effect: Behavioral and neurocomputational evidence , 2008, Vision Research.

[22]  T. L. Hickey,et al.  Postnatal development of the human lateral geniculate nucleus: relationship to a critical period for the visual system , 1977, Science.

[23]  C. McManus,et al.  Sensitivity to the Displacement of Facial Features in Negative and Inverted Images , 1990, Perception.

[24]  V Bruce,et al.  Configural Features in the Context of Upright and Inverted Faces , 2001, Perception.

[25]  Anthony Randal McIntosh,et al.  Early Face Processing Specificity: It's in the Eyes! , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  P. L. Harris Infant perception: From sensation to cognition L.B. Cohen & P. Salapatek. Academic Press, New York (1975). Vol. 1, 438 pp., £11.25 and Vol. 2, 256 pp., £8.75 , 1976, Neuroscience.

[27]  J. Atkinson Early visual development: Differential functioning of parvocellular and magnocellular pathways , 1992, Eye.

[28]  J. Tanaka The entry point of face recognition: evidence for face expertise. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[29]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Perceptual Expertise as a Shift From Strategic Interference to Automatic Holistic Processing , 2011, Current directions in psychological science.

[30]  Lisa S. Scott,et al.  Mechanisms Underlying the Emergence of Object Representations during Infancy , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Cognitive and Neural Development of Face Recognition in Humans , 2009 .

[32]  O. Pascalis,et al.  Is the face-perception system human-specific at birth? , 2012, Developmental psychology.

[33]  J. Bullinaria,et al.  Reviews: The Race for Consciousness, Fleeting Memories: Cognition of Brief Visual Stimuli, Evolving Thoughts on Thought and its Evolution, An Anatomy of Thought: The Origin and Machinery of the Mind , 2000 .

[34]  B. Renault,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of facial decision: insights from upright and upside-down Mooney-face perception. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[35]  M. Eimer,et al.  The N170 component and its links to configural face processing: A rapid neural adaptation study , 2011, Brain Research.

[36]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Early Visually Evoked Electrophysiological Responses Over the Human Brain (P1, N170) Show Stable Patterns of Face-Sensitivity from 4 years to Adulthood , 2009, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[37]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Should we reject the expertise hypothesis? , 2007, Cognition.

[38]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[39]  Cindy M. Bukach,et al.  Holistic Processing of Words Modulated by Reading Experience , 2011, PloS one.

[40]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  The development of face expertise , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[41]  Carlo Umiltà,et al.  Newborns' preference for faces: what is crucial? , 2002, Developmental psychology.

[42]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Rapid face-selective adaptation of an early extrastriate component in MEG. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[43]  M. Bindemann,et al.  Brain potential correlates of face recognition: geometric distortions and the N250r brain response to stimulus repetitions. , 2008, Psychophysiology.

[44]  M. Riesenhuber,et al.  Evaluation of a Shape-Based Model of Human Face Discrimination Using fMRI and Behavioral Techniques , 2006, Neuron.

[45]  Susan M. Letourneau,et al.  Behavioral and ERP measures of holistic face processing in a composite task , 2008, Brain and Cognition.

[46]  Garrison W Cottrell,et al.  Not All Visual Expertise Is Holistic, but It May Be Leftist , 2009, Psychological science.

[47]  Charles A. Nelson,et al.  A behavioural and ERP investigation of 3-month-olds’ face preferences , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[49]  G. Schwarzer,et al.  Evidence of a shift from featural to configural face processing in infancy. , 2007, Developmental science.

[50]  M. Farah,et al.  Parts and Wholes in Face Recognition , 1993, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[51]  J. Tanaka,et al.  The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants , 2009, Psychiatry Research.

[52]  L. Palumbo,et al.  Looking at eye gaze processing and its neural correlates in infancy-implications for social development and autism spectrum disorder. , 2009, Child development.

[53]  F. Sai,et al.  The role of the mother's voice in developing mother's face preference: Evidence for intermodal perception at birth , 2005 .

[54]  Roxane J. Itier,et al.  Face, eye and object early processing: What is the face specificity? , 2006, NeuroImage.

[55]  L. Scott,et al.  Experience-dependent neural specialization during infancy , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[56]  Mark H Johnson,et al.  Face-sensitive cortical processing in early infancy. , 2004, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[57]  Charles A. Nelson,et al.  Modulation of Face-sensitive Event-related Potentials by Canonical and Distorted Human Faces: The Role of Vertical Symmetry and Up-Down Featural Arrangement , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[58]  G. Hole,et al.  Evidence for Holistic Processing of Faces Viewed as Photographic Negatives , 1999, Perception.

[59]  S. Kojima,et al.  Configurational Factors in the Perception of Faces and Non-Facial Objects: An ERP Study , 2008, The International journal of neuroscience.

[60]  A. Burton,et al.  N250r: a face-selective brain response to stimulus repetitions , 2004, Neuroreport.

[61]  A. Burton,et al.  Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[62]  J. Haxby,et al.  Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[63]  S. Schweinberger,et al.  The faces you remember: Caricaturing shape facilitates brain processes reflecting the acquisition of new face representations , 2012, Biological Psychology.

[64]  D. Ventura,et al.  Large sample population age norms for visual acuities obtained with Vistech-Teller Acuity Cards. , 1995, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[65]  C. Jacques,et al.  Misaligning face halves increases and delays the N170 specifically for upright faces: Implications for the nature of early face representations , 2010, Brain Research.

[66]  M. Farah,et al.  What is "special" about face perception? , 1998, Psychological review.

[67]  M. Eimer,et al.  Response profile of the face-sensitive N170 component: a rapid adaptation study. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[68]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[69]  Marianella Casasola,et al.  The Development of Specialized Processing of Own-Race Faces in Infancy. , 2009, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[70]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Processing the Trees and the Forest during Initial Stages of Face Perception: Electrophysiological Evidence , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[71]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Newborns' preferential tracking of face-like stimuli and its subsequent decline , 1991, Cognition.

[72]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces? , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[73]  S. de Schonen,et al.  Hemispheric asymmetry in a face discrimination task in infants. , 1990, Child development.

[74]  Stefan R Schweinberger,et al.  Age-related slowing in face and name recognition: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2002, Psychology and aging.

[75]  B. Rossion,et al.  Nonlinear relationship between holistic processing of individual faces and picture-plane rotation: evidence from the face composite illusion. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[76]  Olivier Pascalis,et al.  Specialization of Neural Mechanisms Underlying Face Recognition in Human Infants , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[77]  Mark H Johnson,et al.  The emergence of the social brain network: Evidence from typical and atypical development , 2005, Development and Psychopathology.

[78]  M. Tarr,et al.  Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[79]  Irene Leo,et al.  Face processing at birth: a Thatcher illusion study. , 2009, Developmental science.

[80]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Newborns' preference for face-relevant stimuli: effects of contrast polarity. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[81]  Carlo Umiltà,et al.  Configural Processing at Birth: Evidence for Perceptual Organisation , 2000, Perception.

[82]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: evidence from a cross-cultural study , 2004, Cognition.

[83]  Mark H Johnson,et al.  Development of face-sensitive event-related potentials during infancy: a review. , 2003, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[84]  M. Corballis,et al.  Turn that frown upside down: ERP effects of thatcherization of misorientated faces. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[85]  Guillaume Thierry,et al.  Is the N170 sensitive to the human face or to several intertwined perceptual and conceptual factors? , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[86]  Pawan Sinha,et al.  Face Recognition by Humans: Nineteen Results All Computer Vision Researchers Should Know About , 2006, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[87]  I. W. R. Bushneil,et al.  Neonatal recognition of the mother's face , 1989 .

[88]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Inversion and Contrast Polarity Reversal Affect both Encoding and Recognition Processes of Unfamiliar Faces: A Repetition Study Using ERPs , 2002, NeuroImage.

[89]  Jürgen Jost,et al.  A computational model of dysfunctional facial encoding in congenital prosopagnosia , 2011, Neural Networks.

[90]  Cindy M. Bukach,et al.  Individuation experience predicts other-race effects in holistic processing for both Caucasian and Black participants , 2012, Cognition.

[91]  C. Jacques,et al.  Early adaptation to repeated unfamiliar faces across viewpoint changes in the right hemisphere: Evidence from the N170 ERP component , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[92]  Shlomo Bentin,et al.  Familiarity effects on categorization levels of faces and objects , 2009, Cognition.

[93]  Elinor McKone,et al.  Early maturity of face recognition: No childhood development of holistic processing, novel face encoding, or face-space , 2009, Cognition.

[94]  K.-S. Choi,et al.  Control of vortex shedding from a hemisphere by local suction , 2006, J. Vis..

[95]  Kathy E. Johnson,et al.  Effects of varying levels of expertise on the basic level of categorization. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[96]  F. Simion,et al.  Can a Nonspecific Bias Toward Top-Heavy Patterns Explain Newborns' Face Preference? , 2004, Psychological science.

[97]  Clara D. Martin,et al.  Controlling for interstimulus perceptual variance abolishes N170 face selectivity , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[98]  David I. Perrett,et al.  Recognition of individual faces and average face prototypes by 1- and 3-month-old infants , 2001 .

[99]  M Eimer,et al.  Does the face‐specific N170 component reflect the activity of a specialized eye processor? , 1998, Neuroreport.

[100]  M. Tarr,et al.  The N170 occipito‐temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face‐specific processes in the human brain , 2000, Neuroreport.

[101]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The Effect of Face Inversion on Activity in Human Neural Systems for Face and Object Perception , 1999, Neuron.

[102]  Claus-Christian Carbon,et al.  The Thatcher illusion seen by the brain: an event-related brain potentials study. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[103]  G. Bronson,et al.  Changes in infants' visual scanning across the 2- to 14-week age period. , 1990, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[104]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Processes Underlying the Cross-Race Effect: An Investigation of Holistic, Featural, and Relational Processing of Own-Race versus Other-Race Faces , 2010, Perception.

[105]  D. Maurer,et al.  Impairment in Holistic Face Processing Following Early Visual Deprivation , 2004, Psychological science.

[106]  I. Gauthier,et al.  An analysis of letter expertise in a levels-of-categorization framework , 2007 .

[107]  L. Scott,et al.  The Origin of Biases in Face Perception , 2009, Psychological science.

[108]  A. Young,et al.  Configurational Information in Face Perception , 1987, Perception.

[109]  Roxane J. Itier,et al.  Neural bases of eye and gaze processing: The core of social cognition , 2009, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[110]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Category Specificity in Early Perception: Face and Word N170 Responses Differ in Both Lateralization and Habituation Properties , 2008, Frontiers in human neuroscience.

[111]  M. Riesenhuber,et al.  Task effects, performance levels, features, configurations, and holistic face processing: a reply to Rossion. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[112]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[113]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[114]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Holistic Processing Is Finely Tuned for Faces of One's Own Race , 2006, Psychological science.

[115]  C. Jacques,et al.  The initial representation of individual faces in the right occipito-temporal cortex is holistic: electrophysiological evidence from the composite face illusion. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[116]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  The N170 Shows Differential Repetition Effects for Faces, Objects, and Orthographic Stimuli , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[117]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Holistic Processing Predicts Face Recognition , 2011, Psychological science.

[118]  C. Nelson,et al.  Brain activity differentiates face and object processing in 6-month-old infants. , 1999, Developmental psychology.

[119]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Foreign-language experience in infancy: Effects of short-term exposure and social interaction on phonetic learning , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[120]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  The Faces of Development: A Review of Early Face Processing over Childhood , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[121]  P. Thompson,et al.  Margaret Thatcher: A New Illusion , 1980, Perception.

[122]  Rachel A Robbins,et al.  No face-like processing for objects-of-expertise in three behavioural tasks , 2007, Cognition.

[123]  A. Freire,et al.  The Face-Inversion Effect as a Deficit in the Encoding of Configural Information: Direct Evidence , 2000, Perception.

[124]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Effects of repetition learning on upright, inverted and contrast-reversed face processing using ERPs , 2004, NeuroImage.

[125]  Elinor McKone,et al.  The evidence rejects the expertise hypothesis: Reply to Gauthier & Bukach , 2007, Cognition.

[126]  O. Pascalis,et al.  The Other-Race Effect Develops During Infancy , 2007, Psychological science.

[127]  F. Eustache,et al.  The time course of repetition effects for familiar faces and objects: An ERP study , 2009, Brain Research.

[128]  H Begleiter,et al.  Event-related brain potentials differentiate priming and recognition to familiar and unfamiliar faces. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[129]  Mark H. Johnson Subcortical face processing , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[130]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[131]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Cortical specialisation for face processing: face-sensitive event-related potential components in 3- and 12-month-old infants , 2003, NeuroImage.

[132]  Lara J. Pierce,et al.  The N250 Brain Potential to Personally Familiar and Newly Learned Faces and Objects , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[133]  James W. Tanaka,et al.  A Reevaluation of the Electrophysiological Correlates of Expert Object Processing , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[134]  G. Yovel,et al.  Why does picture-plane inversion sometimes dissociate perception of features and spacing in faces, and sometimes not? Toward a new theory of holistic processing , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[135]  T. Striano,et al.  Processing faces in dyadic and triadic contexts , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[136]  P. Salapatek Chapter 3 – Pattern Perception in Early Infancy1 , 1975 .

[137]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Source analysis of the N170 to faces and objects , 2004, Neuroreport.

[138]  Werner Sommer,et al.  Repetition priming and associative priming of face recognition: Evidence from event-related potentials. , 1995 .

[139]  O. Pascalis,et al.  Perceptual Training Prevents the Emergence of the Other Race Effect during Infancy , 2011, PloS one.

[140]  Cindy M. Bukach,et al.  Beyond faces and modularity: the power of an expertise framework , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[141]  J. Brigham,et al.  Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review , 2001 .

[142]  O. Pascalis,et al.  Is Face Processing Species-Specific During the First Year of Life? , 2002, Science.

[143]  Y. Sugita Face perception in monkeys reared with no exposure to faces , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[144]  Sarah E. MacPherson,et al.  Familiar Other-Race Faces Show Normal Holistic Processing and are Robust to Perceptual Stress , 2007, Perception.

[145]  B. Rossion Distinguishing the cause and consequence of face inversion: the perceptual field hypothesis. , 2009, Acta psychologica.

[146]  M. Tarr,et al.  Expertise Training with Novel Objects Leads to Left-Lateralized Facelike Electrophysiological Responses , 2002, Psychological science.