Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS

The multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods VIKOR and TOPSIS are based on an aggregating function representing ‘‘closeness to the ideal’’, which originated in the compromise programming method. In VIKOR linear normalization and in TOPSIS vector normalization is used to eliminate the units of criterion functions. The VIKOR method of compromise ranking determines a compromise solution, providing a maximum ‘‘group utility’’ for the ‘‘majority’’ and a minimum of an individual regret for the ‘‘opponent’’. The TOPSIS method determines a solution with the shortest distance to the ideal solution and the greatest distance from the negative-ideal solution, but it does not consider the relative importance of these distances. A comparative analysis of these two methods is illustrated with a numerical example, showing their similarity and some differences. � 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

[1]  Bertrand Mareschal,et al.  Prométhée: a new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis , 1984 .

[2]  Chung-Hsing Yeh,et al.  Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights , 2000, Comput. Oper. Res..

[3]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[4]  C. Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Objective Decision Making: Methods And Applications , 1996 .

[5]  Marc Roubens,et al.  Multiple criteria decision making , 1994 .

[6]  K. Yoon A Reconciliation Among Discrete Compromise Solutions , 1987 .

[7]  H. Kunzi,et al.  Lectu re Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems , 1975 .

[8]  L. Duckstein,et al.  Multiobjective optimization in river basin development , 1980 .

[9]  A. Pascu Operational research '81: J.P. Brans (Ed.) Proceedings of the Ninth IFORS International Conference on Operational Research, Hamburg, Germany, July 20–24, 1981, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1981, xx + 984 pages, Dfl.250.000 , 1982 .

[10]  C. Hwang,et al.  TOPSIS for MODM , 1994 .

[11]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Multiple Attribute Decision Making , 1998 .

[12]  Bertrand Mareschal,et al.  Weight stability intervals in multicriteria decision aid , 1988 .

[13]  P. Yu A Class of Solutions for Group Decision Problems , 1973 .

[14]  Evangelos Triantaphyllou,et al.  Multi-criteria Decision Making Methods: A Comparative Study , 2000 .

[15]  Dubravka M. Pavlicic,et al.  Normalisation affects the results of MADM methods , 2001 .

[16]  B. Mareschal,et al.  Novel types of sensitivity analysis for additive MCDM methods , 1995 .

[17]  David L. Olson,et al.  Comparison of three multicriteria methods to predict known outcomes , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..