Motivational orientation modulates the neural response to reward

Motivational orientation defines the source of motivation for an individual to perform a particular action and can either originate from internal desires (e.g., interest) or external compensation (e.g., money). To this end, motivational orientation should influence the way positive or negative feedback is processed during learning situations and this might in turn have an impact on the learning process. In the present study, we thus investigated whether motivational orientation, i.e., extrinsic and intrinsic motivation modulates the neural response to reward and punishment as well as learning from reward and punishment in 33 healthy individuals. To assess neural responses to reward, punishment and learning of reward contingencies we employed a probabilistic reversal learning task during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation were assessed with a self-report questionnaire. Rewarding trials fostered activation in the medial orbitofrontal cortex and anterior cingulate gyrus (ACC) as well as the amygdala and nucleus accumbens, whereas for punishment an increased neural response was observed in the medial and inferior prefrontal cortex, the superior parietal cortex and the insula. High extrinsic motivation was positively correlated to increased neural responses to reward in the ACC, amygdala and putamen, whereas a negative relationship between intrinsic motivation and brain activation in these brain regions was observed. These findings show that motivational orientation indeed modulates the responsiveness to reward delivery in major components of the human reward system and therefore extends previous results showing a significant influence of individual differences in reward-related personality traits on the neural processing of reward.

[1]  T. Robbins,et al.  Defining the Neural Mechanisms of Probabilistic Reversal Learning Using Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  P. Dayan,et al.  Cortical substrates for exploratory decisions in humans , 2006, Nature.

[3]  Vincent Giampietro,et al.  Individual differences in disgust sensitivity modulate neural responses to aversive/disgusting stimuli , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[4]  A. Lawrence,et al.  Individual Differences in Reward Drive Predict Neural Responses to Images of Food , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[6]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets , 2003, NeuroImage.

[7]  Brian Knutson,et al.  Anticipation of Increasing Monetary Reward Selectively Recruits Nucleus Accumbens , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  K. Berridge,et al.  Affective neuroscience of pleasure: reward in humans and animals , 2008, Psychopharmacology.

[9]  Peter Kirsch,et al.  Anticipation of reward in a nonaversive differential conditioning paradigm and the brain reward system: an event-related fMRI study , 2003, NeuroImage.

[10]  R. Elliott,et al.  Medial orbitofrontal cortex codes relative rather than absolute value of financial rewards in humans , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[11]  Samuel M. McClure,et al.  The Neural Substrates of Reward Processing in Humans: The Modern Role of fMRI , 2004, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[12]  Gregor Thut,et al.  Activation of the human brain by monetary reward , 1997, Neuroreport.

[13]  E. Rolls,et al.  Abstract reward and punishment representations in the human orbitofrontal cortex , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  M. Reuter,et al.  Dopamine DRD2 polymorphism alters reversal learning and associated neural activity , 2009, NeuroImage.

[15]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  Individual differences in extraversion and dopamine genetics predict neural reward responses. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[16]  Hannah S. Locke,et al.  Motivational influences on cognitive control: Behavior, brain activation, and individual differences , 2008, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[17]  Samuel M. McClure,et al.  A computational substrate for incentive salience , 2003, Trends in Neurosciences.

[18]  R. J. Vallerand,et al.  Construction et validation l'echelle de motivation relative aux jeux de hasard et d'argent , 1994 .

[20]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Neural Responses during Anticipation of a Primary Taste Reward , 2002, Neuron.

[21]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[22]  N. Tzourio-Mazoyer,et al.  Automated Anatomical Labeling of Activations in SPM Using a Macroscopic Anatomical Parcellation of the MNI MRI Single-Subject Brain , 2002, NeuroImage.

[23]  E. Deci,et al.  A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. , 1999, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  S. Scott,et al.  Saying it with feeling: neural responses to emotional vocalizations , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  Richard B. Ivry,et al.  The influence of feedback valence in associative learning , 2009, NeuroImage.

[26]  Dick J. Veltman,et al.  Neural correlates of a reversal learning task with an affectively neutral baseline: An event-related fMRI study , 2005, NeuroImage.

[27]  E. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[28]  Felix Breuer,et al.  Neural response to reward anticipation is modulated by Gray's impulsivity , 2009, NeuroImage.

[29]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[30]  E. Rolls,et al.  Different representations of pleasant and unpleasant odours in the human brain , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[31]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  Connectivity-based segregation of the human striatum predicts personality characteristics , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.