Identification of experimental models for control design

The identification of linear models that are particularly suitable for serving as a basis for (robust) model-based control design has recently attracted considerable attention. Both the system identification community and the control community have spent considerable efforts in developing a coherent approach to the problem. Typical problems that have to be dealt with consider questions of optimal experiment design, feedback-relevant system approximations and control-relevant model uncertainty specifications. Research into these problems has delivered several attempts for bridging the gap between identification and control theory. In this lecture these developments are highlighted, directing particular attention to the identification of control-relevant approximate models, the use of closed-loop experimental data for identification, the quantification of model uncertainty, and the use of identification criteria that are motivated by control performance cost functions.

[1]  Xavier Bombois,et al.  A measure of robust stability for an identified set of parametrized transfer functions , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[2]  Graham C. Goodwin,et al.  Estimation of model quality , 1994, Autom..

[3]  Håkan Hjalmarsson,et al.  For model-based control design, closed-loop identification gives better performance , 1996, Autom..

[4]  Jozsef Bokor,et al.  System identification with generalized orthonormal basis functions , 1995, Autom..

[5]  J. Doyle,et al.  Robust and optimal control , 1995, Proceedings of 35th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[6]  Paul M. J. Van den Hof,et al.  Identification and control - Closed-loop issues , 1995, Autom..

[7]  Mario Milanese,et al.  Set Membership Identification for H∞ Robust Control Design , 2000 .

[8]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  System Identification: Theory for the User , 1987 .

[9]  M Maarten Steinbuch,et al.  Performance enhancement on the basis of identified model uncertainty sets with application to a CD mechanism , 1999 .

[10]  Graham C. Goodwin,et al.  Estimated Transfer Functions with Application to Model Order Selection , 1992 .

[11]  Michel Gevers,et al.  Towards a Joint Design of Identification and Control , 1993 .

[12]  P. V. D. Hof,et al.  Suboptimal feedback control by a scheme of iterative identification and control design , 1997 .

[13]  P.M.J. Van den Hof,et al.  CLOSID : A matlab* Toolbox for closed-loop system , 1999 .

[14]  Paul M. J. Van den Hof,et al.  Quantification of uncertainty in transfer function estimation: a mixed probabilistic-worst-case approach , 1995, Autom..

[15]  Karl Johan Åström,et al.  Oscillations in Systems with Relay Feedback , 1993 .

[16]  P. V. D. Hof,et al.  Identification of probabilistic system uncertainty regions by explicit evaluation of bias and variance errors , 1997, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[17]  Raymond A. de Callafon,et al.  Multivariable feedback relevant system identification of a wafer stepper system , 2001, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[18]  Petre Stoica,et al.  Decentralized Control , 2018, The Control Systems Handbook.

[19]  Michel Gevers,et al.  Asymptotic variance expressions for closed-loop identification , 2001, Autom..

[20]  J. Norton,et al.  Bounding Approaches to System Identification , 1996 .

[21]  Paul M.J. Van den Hof,et al.  Closed-Loop Issues in System Identification , 1997 .

[22]  P. Eykhoff System Identification Parameter and State Estimation , 1974 .

[23]  Lennart Ljung,et al.  Closed-loop identification revisited , 1999, Autom..

[24]  B. Ninness,et al.  A unifying construction of orthonormal bases for system identification , 1997, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..