Adaptive simultaneous position and stiffness control for a soft robot arm

In this paper, an independent joint position and stiffness adaptive control for a robot arm actuated by McKibben artificial muscles is reported. In particular, muscular and dynamic parameters of the system are supposed unknown. Adaptive control performance is tested in a one degree of freedom experimental setup and compared with PID control performance. The adaptive control scheme is then applied to a robot arm that is conceived to perform tasks in anthropic environments. The adaptive control developed is such that performance of the robot arm is very similar to human arm performance. Experimental results are reported.

[1]  Weiping Li,et al.  Adaptive manipulator control a case study , 1987, Proceedings. 1987 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[2]  Jean-Jacques E. Slotine,et al.  Adaptive manipulator control: A case study , 1988 .

[3]  Ferdinando A. Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Geometric Structure of the Adaptive Controller of the Human Arm , 1993 .

[4]  A. G. Feldman,et al.  The origin and use of positional frames of reference in motor control , 1995, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[5]  Darwin G. Caldwell,et al.  Control of pneumatic muscle actuators , 1995 .

[6]  J. Wallaschek.  Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Motors , 1995 .

[7]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Measurement and modeling of McKibben pneumatic artificial muscles , 1996, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[8]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Study of human forearm posture maintenance with a physiologically based robotic arm and spinal level neural controller , 1997, Biological Cybernetics.

[9]  Kenji Uchino.  Piezoelectric ultrasonic motors: overview , 1998 .

[10]  Blake Hannaford,et al.  Fatigue characteristics of McKibben artificial muscle actuators , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Innovations in Theory, Practice and Applications (Cat. No.98CH36190).

[11]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[12]  Yoseph Bar-Cohen.  Smart structures and materials 1999 : electroactive polymer actuators and devices : 1-2 March, 1999, Newport Beach, California , 1999 .

[13]  Steven G. Wax,et al.  Electroactive polymer actuators and devices , 1999, Smart Structures.

[14]  Yoseph Bar-Cohen,et al.  Electroactive Polymer (EAP) Actuators as Artificial Muscles: Reality, Potential, and Challenges, Second Edition , 2004 .

[15]  Y. Cohen.  Electroactive Polymer (EAP) Actuators as Artificial Muscles - Reality , 2001 .

[16]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Compliant design for intrinsic safety: general issues and preliminary design , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Expanding the Societal Role of Robotics in the the Next Millennium (Cat. No.01CH37180).

[17]  D. Ostry,et al.  Relationship between cocontraction, movement kinematics and phasic muscle activity in single-joint arm movement , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.