Dynamic hybrid multimedia distribution scheme based on network reconfiguration

This paper addresses a key challenge in the design and implementation of multimedia distribution systems so that users can experience good performance with minimal operational costs. In current structures, the conflict between network architectures and service provision causes a decline in users’ expectations of quality. Network reconfiguration provides a feasible solution for dynamic distribution as a primitive for both quality and efficiency. In this paper, we first present a scheme for a layer-based hybrid multimedia distribution system LHMDS, and then introduce a dynamic sliding push-delivery mechanism based on reconfiguration of the distribution of hotspot files. The LHMDS adopts a unique structure with hybrid channels, including broadcast and unicast ones, and adjusts its distribution topology according to the congestion status, thereby pushing hotspot files dynamically. The mechanism dynamically pushes files to upper or lower network layers depending on the network status while distributing hotspot files by broadcast channels and other files by unicast ones. This guarantees service quality as well as improving resource utilization. Finally, we validate the feasibility and performance of the scheme through a simulation.摘要本文提出一种基于网络重构的动态流媒体混合分发方案, 并给出一种面向热点数据的动态滑动推送机制, 该机制采用“广播+单播”的独特流媒体分发架构, 基于资源重构可支持面向网络拥塞状态的动态分发网络拓扑变化, 从而实现热点流媒体数据的滑动推送, 在保证用户服务质量的同时提高了资源利用率。

[1]  Olof Hagsand,et al.  Distributed Control for Decentralized Modular Routers , 2004 .

[2]  Srinivas Shakkottai,et al.  Demand-aware content distribution on the internet , 2010, IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw..

[3]  Kenneth Ward Church,et al.  On Delivering Embarrassingly Distributed Cloud Services , 2008, HotNets.

[4]  Vyas Sekar,et al.  Understanding the impact of video quality on user engagement , 2011, SIGCOMM 2011.

[5]  Rute C. Sofia,et al.  User-provided networks: consumer as provider , 2008, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[6]  Mario Gerla,et al.  Will IPTV ride the peer-to-peer stream? [Peer-to-Peer Multimedia Streaming] , 2007, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[7]  Donald E. Smith IP TV Bandwidth Demand: Multicast and Channel Surfing , 2007, IEEE INFOCOM 2007 - 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[8]  Zhang Xiaozhe Control-Plane Model of Reconstituted Router Based on Virtualization Technology , 2009 .

[9]  Antonio M. Batista,et al.  Delayed feedback control of bursting synchronization in a scale-free neuronal network , 2010, Neural Networks.

[10]  Wei Luo,et al.  The design and implementation of Media Distribution System in 3Tnet VOD , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Consumer Electronics, Communications and Networks (CECNet).

[11]  Catherine Rosenberg,et al.  Analysis of a CDN–P2P hybrid architecture for cost-effective streaming media distribution , 2006, Multimedia Systems.

[12]  Bo Li,et al.  Design and deployment of a hybrid CDN-P2P system for live video streaming: experiences with LiveSky , 2009, ACM Multimedia.

[13]  Kien A. Hua,et al.  Skyscraper broadcasting: a new broadcasting scheme for metropolitan video-on-demand systems , 1997, SIGCOMM '97.

[14]  David Mazières,et al.  Democratizing Content Publication with Coral , 2004, NSDI.

[15]  Divesh Srivastava,et al.  CPM: Adaptive Video-on-Demand with Cooperative Peer Assists and Multicast , 2009, IEEE INFOCOM 2009.

[16]  Wang Hao Research on Architecture of Universal Carrying Network , 2009 .

[17]  Julong Lan,et al.  Providing personalized converged services based on flexible network reconfiguration , 2010, Science China Information Sciences.

[18]  Vyas Sekar,et al.  Understanding the impact of video quality on user engagement , 2011, SIGCOMM.

[19]  Weisong Shi,et al.  A survey on dynamic Web content generation and delivery techniques , 2009, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[20]  Jun Li,et al.  Optimal P2P Cache Sizing: A Monetary Cost Perspective on Capacity Design of Caches to Reduce P2P Traffic , 2011, 2011 IEEE 17th International Conference on Parallel and Distributed Systems.

[21]  Pablo Rodriguez,et al.  I tube, you tube, everybody tubes: analyzing the world's largest user generated content video system , 2007, IMC '07.

[22]  Van Jacobson,et al.  Networking named content , 2009, CoNEXT '09.

[23]  Cheng Huang,et al.  Understanding hybrid CDN-P2P: why limelight needs its own Red Swoosh , 2008, NOSSDAV.

[24]  Rakesh Kumar,et al.  Stochastic Fluid Theory for P2P Streaming Systems , 2007, IEEE INFOCOM 2007 - 26th IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[25]  Wu Jiang-xing Development Trends and Associated Countermeasures Analysis for NGN , 2009 .

[26]  Jiang Hai Hybrid Content Distribution Network and Its Performance Modeling , 2009 .

[27]  Yang Yang Components-Based Reconstructable Routing Development Environment , 2009 .

[28]  Luigi Carro,et al.  A low cost and adaptable routing network for reconfigurable systems , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Parallel & Distributed Processing.

[29]  Kang G. Shin,et al.  Multicast Video-on-Demand services , 2002, CCRV.