Parametric Representation of the Environment of a Mobile Robot for Measurement Update in a Particle Filter

A mobile robot must know its position and heading, all the time during navigation. This is called localization. Recently particle filters [1] have become extremely popular for position estimation. These are simple to program, can process raw sensor data and can handle any probability distributions. A good tutorial on particle filters is [2]. Particle filters update the pose of the robot by using a motion model and a measurement model alternatively and recursively. The motion model predicts a few possible positions of the robot (also called particles) based on onboard sensors when a control action is taken and assigns weight to each of these poses. The measurement model describes the relationship between sensor measurements and the physical world and is used to update the weights of particles. This measurement model is usually represented as a conditional probability or likelihood. The two important issues in using a distribution for measurement update are making use of maximum information available and the computational efficiency. The particle filters require a large number of particles in order to accurately estimate the state. This negates their advantage in real-time applications. Further discussion on computational complexity can be found in [3]. The likelihood updates are the major cause of computational inefficiency.

[1]  Jayantha Katupitiya,et al.  Development of a Parametric Model for the Environment of a Mobile Robot , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[2]  T. Yaqub,et al.  A Procedure to make the Probabilistic Odometry Motion Model of an Autonomous Wheelchair , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation.

[3]  Wolfram Burgard,et al.  Robust Monte Carlo localization for mobile robots , 2001, Artif. Intell..

[4]  Neil J. Gordon,et al.  A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking , 2002, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[5]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Probabilistic robotics , 2002, CACM.

[6]  S. T. Buckland,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap. , 1994 .

[7]  Qingxiang Wu,et al.  Rough computational methods on reducing cost of computation in Markov localization for mobile robots , 2002, Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (Cat. No.02EX527).

[8]  T. Yaqub,et al.  Modelling the Environment of a Mobile Robot using Feature Based Principal Component Analysis , 2006, 2006 IEEE Conference on Robotics, Automation and Mechatronics.

[9]  S. Thrun,et al.  Particle Filters for Rover Fault Diagnosis , 2004 .

[10]  Fred Daum,et al.  Mysterious computational complexity of particle filters , 2002, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[11]  Sebastian Thrun,et al.  Real-time fault diagnosis [robot fault diagnosis] , 2004, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[12]  Dieter Fox,et al.  Adapting the Sample Size in Particle Filters Through KLD-Sampling , 2003, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[13]  Dieter Fox,et al.  Adaptive real-time particle filters for robot localization , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[14]  Jake K. Aggarwal,et al.  Mobile robot self-location using model-image feature correspondence , 1996, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[15]  N. Gordon,et al.  Novel approach to nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian state estimation , 1993 .

[16]  Richard T. Vaughan,et al.  The Player/Stage Project: Tools for Multi-Robot and Distributed Sensor Systems , 2003 .

[17]  Howie Choset,et al.  Probabilistic hierarchical spatial model for mine locations and its application in robotic landmine search , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.