HelixFlex : bioinspired maneuverable instrument for skull base surgery

Endoscopic endonasal surgery is currently regarded as the 'gold standard' for operating on pituitary gland tumors, and is becoming more and more accepted for treatment of other skull base lesions. However, endoscopic surgical treatment of most skull base pathologies, including certain pituitary tumors, is severely impaired by current instruments lack of maneuverability. Especially, gaining access to, and visibility of, difficult-to-reach anatomical corners without interference with surrounding neurovascular structures or other instruments, is a challenge. In this context there is the need for instruments that are able to provide a stable shaft position, while both the orientation and the position of the end-effector can be independently controlled. Current instruments that allow for this level of maneuverability are usually mechanically complex, and hence less suitable for mass production. This study therefore focuses on the development of a new actuation technique that allows for the required maneuverability while reducing the construction complexity. This actuation technique, referred to as multi-actuation, integrates multiple cable routings into a single steerable structure. Multi-actuation has been successfully integrated and tested in a handheld prototype instrument called HelixFlex. HelixFlex contains a 4 degrees of freedom maneuverable 5.8 mm (diameter) tip and shows promising results concerning its maneuverability and potential rigidity.

[1]  Paul Breedveld,et al.  Attaining high bending stiffness by full actuation in steerable minimally invasive surgical instruments , 2015, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[2]  H. Choset,et al.  A highly articulated robotic surgical system for minimally invasive surgery. , 2009, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[3]  Guillaume Morel,et al.  Toward the Development of a Hand-Held Surgical Robot for Laparoscopy , 2010, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[4]  Peter Kan,et al.  Outcomes of Surgically Treated Giant Pituitary Tumours , 2012, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[5]  Majid Maybody,et al.  Overview of navigation systems in image-guided interventions. , 2013, Techniques in vascular and interventional radiology.

[6]  J. Gondim,et al.  Giant pituitary adenomas: surgical outcomes of 50 cases operated on by the endonasal endoscopic approach. , 2014, World neurosurgery.

[7]  Jérôme Szewczyk,et al.  An articulated handle to improve the ergonomic performance of robotic dextrous instruments for laparoscopic surgery , 2014 .

[8]  J. Klausner,et al.  Treatment of Intra-Gastric Band Migration Following Laparoscopic Banding: Safety and Feasibility of Simultaneous Laparoscopic Band Removal and Replacement , 2005, Obesity surgery.

[9]  C Freschi,et al.  Technical review of the da Vinci surgical telemanipulator , 2013, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[10]  Peter Kazanzides,et al.  Design and Integration of a Telerobotic System for Minimally Invasive Surgery of the Throat , 2009, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[11]  Ender Korfali,et al.  Surgical limits in transnasal approach to opticocarotid region and planum sphenoidale: an anatomic cadaveric study. , 2010, World neurosurgery.

[12]  R. Webster,et al.  Robotic surgery for the sinuses and skull base: what are the possibilities and what are the obstacles? , 2013, Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery.

[13]  Philip J Swaney,et al.  Forces Applied at the Skull Base during Transnasal Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Pituitary Tumor Excision , 2013, Journal of Neurological Surgery—Part B.

[14]  A. Gorgulho,et al.  Endonasal transsphenoidal surgery and multimodality treatment for giant pituitary adenomas , 2010, Clinical endocrinology.

[15]  Alfred Cuschieri,et al.  Economic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery: a systematic review , 2012, Surgical Endoscopy.

[16]  Jean Anderson Eloy,et al.  Surgical nuances for removal of olfactory groove meningiomas using the endoscopic endonasal transcribriform approach. , 2011, Neurosurgical focus.

[17]  Abtin Tabaee,et al.  Endoscopic cranial base surgery: classification of operative approaches. , 2008, Neurosurgery.

[18]  JOHAN L. VAN LEEUWEN,et al.  EVOLUTIONARYMECHANICS OF PROTRUSIBLE TENTACLES AND TONGUES by , 2002 .

[19]  A Cuschieri,et al.  Laparoscopic surgery: current status, issues and future developments. , 2005, The surgeon : journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland.

[20]  Theodore H Schwartz,et al.  Endoscopic endonasal compared with microscopic transsphenoidal and open transcranial resection of craniopharyngiomas. , 2012, World neurosurgery.

[21]  Christopher D. Rahn,et al.  Design of Continuous Backbone, Cable-Driven Robots , 2002 .

[22]  J Dankelman,et al.  Scopes Too Flexible...and Too Stiff , 2010, IEEE Pulse.

[23]  A Menciassi,et al.  A bioinspired soft manipulator for minimally invasive surgery , 2015, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[24]  R. Webster,et al.  Endonasal Skull Base Tumor Removal Using Concentric Tube Continuum Robots: A Phantom Study , 2014, Journal of Neurological Surgery—Part B.

[25]  Ewout A. Arkenbout,et al.  Classification of Joints Used in Steerable Instruments for Minimally Invasive Surgery , 2014 .

[26]  F. Esposito,et al.  Extended endoscopic endonasal approach to the midline skull base: the evolving role of transsphenoidal surgery. , 2008, Advances and technical standards in neurosurgery.

[27]  D. Rattner,et al.  ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery , 2006, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[28]  Howie Choset,et al.  Three degrees-of-freedom joint for spatial hyper-redundant robots , 2006 .

[29]  J. K. Liu,et al.  Defining the “edge of the envelope”: patient selection in treating complex sellar-based neoplasms via transsphenoidal versus open craniotomy , 2011 .

[30]  W. Kier The functional morphology of the musculature of squid (Loliginidae) arms and tentacles , 1982, Journal of morphology.

[31]  Paolo Cappabianca,et al.  The evolving role of the transsphenoidal route in the management of craniopharyngiomas. , 2012, World neurosurgery.

[32]  P. Gardner,et al.  What are the limits of endoscopic sinus surgery?: the expanded endonasal approach to the skull base. , 2009, The Keio journal of medicine.

[33]  Robert J. Webster,et al.  Toward Active Cannulas: Miniature Snake-Like Surgical Robots , 2006, 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[34]  Alain Micaelli,et al.  Comparative review of endoscopic devices articulations technologies developed for minimally invasive medical procedures , 2011 .

[35]  Paolo Cappabianca,et al.  Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Surgery , 2003, Springer Vienna.

[36]  P. Breedveld,et al.  A new, easily miniaturized steerable endoscope , 2005, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[37]  Ian D. Walker,et al.  Soft robotics: Biological inspiration, state of the art, and future research , 2008 .

[38]  Dimitra Dodou,et al.  Review of manual control methods for handheld maneuverable instruments , 2013, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[39]  C. Vaida,et al.  Orientation module for surgical instruments—a systematical approach , 2013 .

[40]  Robert J. Webster,et al.  Mechanics of Precurved-Tube Continuum Robots , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[41]  M. S. Vosse Development of a New Multi-Steerable Laparoscopic Instrument , 2010 .

[42]  J. Bruce C. Davies,et al.  Continuum robots - a state of the art , 1999, Proceedings 1999 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.99CH36288C).

[43]  Warren D. Smith,et al.  Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery , 1999, Surgical Endoscopy.

[44]  Robert J. Webster,et al.  A Telerobotic System for Transnasal Surgery , 2014, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics.

[45]  Robert J. Webster,et al.  Design and Kinematic Modeling of Constant Curvature Continuum Robots: A Review , 2010, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[46]  Mario Zuccarello,et al.  Expanding the boundaries of the transsphenoidal approach: A microanatomic study , 2001, Clinical anatomy.

[47]  Cameron N. Riviere,et al.  Toward active tremor canceling in handheld microsurgical instruments , 2003, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[48]  Fred Gentili,et al.  Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Approach to Large and Giant Pituitary Adenomas: Institutional Experience and Predictors of Extent of Resection , 2013 .

[49]  W. Kier The diversity of hydrostatic skeletons , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[50]  Domenico Solari,et al.  Size does not matter. The intrigue of giant adenomas: a true surgical challenge , 2014, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[51]  Paolo Cappabianca,et al.  Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery. , 2004 .

[52]  Johan L. van Leeuwen,et al.  Evolutionary Mechanics of Protrusible Tentacles and Tongues , 2000 .

[53]  D. Kelly,et al.  Value of endoscopy for maximizing tumor removal in endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary adenoma surgery. , 2013, Journal of neurosurgery.