Prospects of Modulating Protein–Protein Interactions

This chapter provides an overview of the approaches used for the design of chemical modulators of protein–protein interactions using computational methods in combination with experimental assays. Strategies for the identification and design of inhibitors of PPIs are presented, including methodologies, advantages, and limitations of the approaches discussed. Examples of the successful application of computational method to protein–protein inhibitor design are presented for the proteins ERK kinase, BCL6, S100B, and the p56Lck kinase SH2 domain.

[1]  Alexander D. MacKerell Empirical force fields for biological macromolecules: Overview and issues , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..

[2]  Chris M. W. Ho,et al.  De Novo Design: Ligand Construction and Prediction of Affinity , 1995 .

[3]  G. V. Paolini,et al.  Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes , 1997, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[4]  J. McCubrey,et al.  Targeting the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway with small-molecule inhibitors. , 2008, Current opinion in investigational drugs.

[5]  A. Hopfinger,et al.  The receptor-dependent QSAR paradigm: an overview of the current state of the art. , 2009, Medicinal chemistry (Shariqah (United Arab Emirates)).

[6]  Shuichi Hirono,et al.  Comparison of Consensus Scoring Strategies for Evaluating Computational Models of Protein-Ligand Complexes , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[7]  William Seibel,et al.  Theoretical and practical considerations in virtual screening: a beaten field? , 2008, Current medicinal chemistry.

[8]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Rational design of human DNA ligase inhibitors that target cellular DNA replication and repair. , 2008, Cancer research.

[9]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  A small-molecule inhibitor of BCL6 kills DLBCL cells in vitro and in vivo. , 2010, Cancer cell.

[10]  Richard A. Lewis,et al.  Three-dimensional pharmacophore methods in drug discovery. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[11]  David J Weber,et al.  Interaction of Dimeric S100B(ββ) with the Tumor Suppressor Protein p53: A Model for Ca2+-Dependent S100-Target Protein Interactions , 2000 .

[12]  Tony Pawson,et al.  SH2 domain specificity and activity modified by a single residue , 1994, Nature.

[13]  Michelle R. Arkin,et al.  Small-molecule inhibitors of protein–protein interactions: progressing towards the dream , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[14]  B. H. Ye,et al.  BCL-6 in the Pathogenesis of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma , 2000, Cancer investigation.

[15]  W. V. Gunsteren,et al.  Validation of the 53A6 GROMOS force field , 2005, European Biophysics Journal.

[16]  Bo Zhou,et al.  Structural basis of docking interactions between ERK2 and MAP kinase phosphatase 3. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  B. Shoichet,et al.  Molecular docking and ligand specificity in fragment-based inhibitor discovery. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.

[18]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  POSE SCALING: GEOMETRICAL ASSESSMENT OF LIGAND BINDING POSES , 2008 .

[19]  Lenwood S. Heath,et al.  H++: a server for estimating pKas and adding missing hydrogens to macromolecules , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[20]  Nicolas Moitessier,et al.  Docking Ligands into Flexible and Solvated Macromolecules. 4. Are Popular Scoring Functions Accurate for this Class of Proteins? , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[21]  Principles and methods of docking and ligand design. , 2003, Methods of biochemical analysis.

[22]  Song Liu,et al.  A knowledge-based energy function for protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-DNA complexes. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[23]  Jianpeng Ma,et al.  CHARMM: The biomolecular simulation program , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[24]  L. Kelley,et al.  An automated approach for clustering an ensemble of NMR-derived protein structures into conformationally related subfamilies. , 1996, Protein engineering.

[25]  Maciej Haranczyk,et al.  Comparison of Nonbinary Similarity Coefficients for Similarity Searching, Clustering and Compound Selection , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[26]  B. Zhao,et al.  Loops Govern SH2 Domain Specificity by Controlling Access to Binding Pockets , 2010, Science Signaling.

[27]  D. van der Spoel,et al.  Blind docking of drug‐sized compounds to proteins with up to a thousand residues , 2006, FEBS letters.

[28]  I. Muegge PMF scoring revisited. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[29]  Guillaume Bouvier,et al.  Automatic clustering of docking poses in virtual screening process using self-organizing map , 2010, Bioinform..

[30]  A. Adjei,et al.  Advances in Targeting the Ras/Raf/MEK/Erk Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Cascade with MEK Inhibitors for Cancer Therapy , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.

[31]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative. , 2008, Current opinion in structural biology.

[32]  P. Chrobak,et al.  HIV-1 Nef Disrupts Maturation of CD4+ T Cells through CD4/Lck Modulation , 2010, The Journal of Immunology.

[33]  B. Ma,et al.  Binding interactions between the core central domain of 16S rRNA and the ribosomal protein S15 determined by molecular dynamics simulations. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[34]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. , 1998, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[35]  Ernst-Walter Knapp,et al.  Improved pKa prediction: Combining empirical and semimicroscopic methods , 2008, J. Comput. Chem..

[36]  P. Yue,et al.  Coordination complex SH2 domain proteomimetics: an alternative approach to disrupting oncogenic protein-protein interactions. , 2010, Chemical communications.

[37]  Anton J. Hopfinger,et al.  4D-QSAR: Perspectives in Drug Design , 2010, Molecules.

[38]  Dusanka Janezic,et al.  Protein-Protein Binding-Sites Prediction by Protein Surface Structure Conservation , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[39]  Jitender Verma,et al.  3D-QSAR in drug design--a review. , 2010, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[40]  D. Sprous,et al.  QSAR in the pharmaceutical research setting: QSAR models for broad, large problems. , 2010, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[41]  Jiro Shimada,et al.  Bootstrap-Based Consensus Scoring Method for Protein-Ligand Docking , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[42]  Wilfred F. van Gunsteren,et al.  Basic ingredients of free energy calculations: A review , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[43]  Patrizia Crivori,et al.  Virtual screening to enrich a compound collection with CDK2 inhibitors using docking, scoring, and composite scoring models , 2005, Proteins.

[44]  G. Harauz,et al.  The classic basic protein of myelin--conserved structural motifs and the dynamic molecular barcode involved in membrane adhesion and protein-protein interactions. , 2009, Current protein & peptide science.

[45]  S. Feller,et al.  Swiprosin-1/EFhd2 Controls B Cell Receptor Signaling through the Assembly of the B Cell Receptor, Syk, and Phospholipase C γ2 in Membrane Rafts , 2010, The Journal of Immunology.

[46]  Uko Maran,et al.  Drug efficiency indices for improvement of molecular docking scoring functions , 2010, J. Comput. Chem..

[47]  I. Kuntz Structure-Based Strategies for Drug Design and Discovery , 1992, Science.

[48]  R. Cramer,et al.  Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. , 1988, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[49]  T. Steinbrecher,et al.  Towards accurate free energy calculations in ligand protein-binding studies. , 2010, Current medicinal chemistry.

[50]  C L Brooks,et al.  Ligand-protein database: linking protein-ligand complex structures to binding data. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[51]  Supot Hannongbua,et al.  Accurate prediction of protonation state as a prerequisite for reliable MM‐PB(GB)SA binding free energy calculations of HIV‐1 protease inhibitors , 2008, J. Comput. Chem..

[52]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  Molecular Fingerprint Recombination: Generating Hybrid Fingerprints for Similarity Searching from Different Fingerprint Types , 2009, ChemMedChem.

[53]  Matthew P. Repasky,et al.  Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[54]  James G. Nourse,et al.  Reoptimization of MDL Keys for Use in Drug Discovery , 2002, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[55]  L. Staudt,et al.  Control of inflammation, cytokine expression, and germinal center formation by BCL-6. , 1997, Science.

[56]  Ray A. Jarvis,et al.  Clustering Using a Similarity Measure Based on Shared Near Neighbors , 1973, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[57]  Jonathan D Hirst,et al.  Machine learning in virtual screening. , 2009, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.

[58]  J. M. Bradshaw,et al.  The Src, Syk, and Tec family kinases: distinct types of molecular switches. , 2010, Cellular signalling.

[59]  J. Irwin,et al.  Benchmarking sets for molecular docking. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[60]  Jason C. Cole,et al.  Testing Assumptions and Hypotheses for Rescoring Success in Protein-Ligand Docking , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[61]  J. Licht,et al.  Specific peptide interference reveals BCL6 transcriptional and oncogenic mechanisms in B-cell lymphoma cells , 2004, Nature Medicine.

[62]  Charles L. Brooks,et al.  λ‐Dynamics free energy simulation methods , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[63]  José A. Encinar,et al.  ADAN: a database for prediction of protein-protein interaction of modular domains mediated by linear motifs , 2009, Bioinform..

[64]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Computational identification of inhibitors of protein-protein interactions. , 2007, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[65]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Consideration of Molecular Weight during Compound Selection in Virtual Target-Based Database Screening , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[66]  Huanxiang Liu,et al.  A novel method for protein‐ligand binding affinity prediction and the related descriptors exploration , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[67]  Xavier Morelli,et al.  GFscore: A General Nonlinear Consensus Scoring Function for High-Throughput Docking , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[68]  W. Cai,et al.  SHEF: a vHTS geometrical filter using coefficients of spherical harmonic molecular surfaces , 2008, Journal of molecular modeling.

[69]  G. Klebe,et al.  Molecular similarity indices in a comparative analysis (CoMSIA) of drug molecules to correlate and predict their biological activity. , 1994, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[70]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Molecular switch controlling the binding of anionic bile acid conjugates to human apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[71]  A. Tomillero,et al.  Gateways to clinical trials. December 2008. , 2008, Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology.

[72]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Recent advances in ligand-based drug design: relevance and utility of the conformationally sampled pharmacophore approach. , 2011, Current computer-aided drug design.

[73]  A. di Nola,et al.  Docking of flexible ligands to flexible receptors in solution by molecular dynamics simulation , 1999, Proteins.

[74]  I. Jang,et al.  Grb2, a simple adapter with complex roles in lymphocyte development, function, and signaling , 2009, Immunological reviews.

[75]  P. Goodford A computational procedure for determining energetically favorable binding sites on biologically important macromolecules. , 1985, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[76]  E. Shakhnovich,et al.  SMoG: de Novo Design Method Based on Simple, Fast, and Accurate Free Energy Estimates. 1. Methodology and Supporting Evidence , 1996 .

[77]  Stephen L. Abrams,et al.  Roles of the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway in cell growth, malignant transformation and drug resistance. , 2007, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[78]  Rebecca C. Wade,et al.  Improving the Continuum Dielectric Approach to Calculating pKas of Ionizable Groups in Proteins , 1996 .

[79]  Yury N. Vorobjev,et al.  Blind docking method combining search of low‐resolution binding sites with ligand pose refinement by molecular dynamics‐based global optimization , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[80]  Xicheng Wang,et al.  An effective docking strategy for virtual screening based on multi-objective optimization algorithm , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[81]  Hans-Joachim Böhm,et al.  LUDI: rule-based automatic design of new substituents for enzyme inhibitor leads , 1992, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[82]  SHENG-YOU HUANG,et al.  An iterative knowledge‐based scoring function to predict protein–ligand interactions: I. Derivation of interaction potentials , 2006, J. Comput. Chem..

[83]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  The OPLS [optimized potentials for liquid simulations] potential functions for proteins, energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. , 1988, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[84]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Computational ligand-based rational design: Role of conformational sampling and force fields in model development. , 2011, MedChemComm.

[85]  Philippe Roche,et al.  Atomic Analysis of Protein-Protein Interfaces with Known Inhibitors: The 2P2I Database , 2010, PloS one.

[86]  Y. Natkunam,et al.  Extracellular signal-regulated kinase positively regulates the oncogenic activity of MCT-1 in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. , 2009, Cancer research.

[87]  Marc F Lensink,et al.  Blind predictions of protein interfaces by docking calculations in CAPRI , 2010, Proteins.

[88]  David J Weber,et al.  Solution structure of rat apo-S100B(beta beta) as determined by NMR spectroscopy. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[89]  A. Melnick,et al.  Structure of a BCOR corepressor peptide in complex with the BCL6 BTB domain dimer. , 2008, Molecular cell.

[90]  J. Hartwig,et al.  A novel interaction between FlnA and Syk regulates platelet ITAM-mediated receptor signaling and function , 2010, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[91]  R. Bahadur,et al.  The interface of protein-protein complexes: Analysis of contacts and prediction of interactions , 2008, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[92]  Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al.  Ligand docking and structure-based virtual screening in drug discovery. , 2007, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[93]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Identification of novel extracellular signal-regulated kinase docking domain inhibitors. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[94]  Leonid A. Mirny,et al.  Using genome-wide measurements for computational prediction of SH2–peptide interactions , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[95]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Divalent metal ion complexes of S100B in the absence and presence of pentamidine. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[96]  David J Weber,et al.  Inhibiting S100B Restores p53 Levels in Primary Malignant Melanoma Cancer Cells* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[97]  R. Sherwood,et al.  Serum S‐100 protein: a potentially useful prognostic marker in cutaneous melanoma , 1997 .

[98]  Richard D. Taylor,et al.  Improved protein–ligand docking using GOLD , 2003, Proteins.

[99]  Gennady M Verkhivker,et al.  Molecular recognition of the inhibitor AG-1343 by HIV-1 protease: conformationally flexible docking by evolutionary programming. , 1995, Chemistry & biology.

[100]  Elizabeth J. Goldsmith,et al.  Atomic structure of the MAP kinase ERK2 at 2.3 Å resolution , 1994, Nature.

[101]  David J Weber,et al.  Solution structure of calcium-bound rat S100B(betabeta) as determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy,. , 1998, Biochemistry.

[102]  Kengo Kinoshita,et al.  Ligand-binding site prediction of proteins based on known fragment–fragment interactions , 2010, Bioinform..

[103]  Hans-Joachim Böhm,et al.  The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure , 1994, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[104]  Vladimir Potemkin,et al.  Principles for 3D/4D QSAR classification of drugs. , 2008, Drug discovery today.

[105]  P. Defossez,et al.  Born to bind: the BTB protein–protein interaction domain , 2006, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[106]  Holger Gohlke,et al.  The Amber biomolecular simulation programs , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[107]  Jong-In Park,et al.  Noncatalytic Function of ERK1/2 Can Promote Raf/MEK/ERK-mediated Growth Arrest Signaling* , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[108]  Todd J. A. Ewing,et al.  DOCK 4.0: Search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases , 2001, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[109]  Dirk Neumann,et al.  A new Lamarckian genetic algorithm for flexible ligand‐receptor docking , 2010, J. Comput. Chem..

[110]  W. Kolch Coordinating ERK/MAPK signalling through scaffolds and inhibitors , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[111]  David G. Lloyd,et al.  Unbiasing Scoring Functions: A New Normalization and Rescoring Strategy , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[112]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Characterization of ATP-independent ERK inhibitors identified through in silico analysis of the active ERK2 structure. , 2006, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.

[113]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Reproducing Crystal Binding Modes of Ligand Functional Groups Using Site-Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) Simulations , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[114]  Ignacio J General A Note on the Standard State's Binding Free Energy. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.

[115]  Alexander Zawaira,et al.  Computational analyses of the surface properties of protein–protein interfaces , 2006, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[116]  Nagasuma Chandra,et al.  PocketDepth: a new depth based algorithm for identification of ligand binding sites in proteins. , 2008, Journal of structural biology.

[117]  J. Richardson,et al.  Asparagine and glutamine: using hydrogen atom contacts in the choice of side-chain amide orientation. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[118]  Michael K. Gilson,et al.  Theory of free energy and entropy in noncovalent binding. , 2009, Chemical reviews.

[119]  A. Pozzan,et al.  Molecular descriptors and methods for ligand based virtual high throughput screening in drug discovery. , 2006, Current pharmaceutical design.

[120]  P. Kollman,et al.  A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules , 1995 .

[121]  Gerrit Groenhof,et al.  GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[122]  R L Juliano,et al.  Macromolecular therapeutics: emerging strategies for drug discovery in the postgenome era. , 2001, Molecular interventions.

[123]  Razvan C. Bunescu,et al.  Consolidating the set of known human protein-protein interactions in preparation for large-scale mapping of the human interactome , 2005, Genome Biology.

[124]  R. Seger,et al.  The extracellular signal-regulated kinase: Multiple substrates regulate diverse cellular functions , 2006, Growth factors.

[125]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Design of Inhibitors for S100B. , 2005, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[126]  David J Weber,et al.  Solution NMR structure of S100B bound to the high-affinity target peptide TRTK-12. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[127]  J A Wells,et al.  Binding in the growth hormone receptor complex. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[128]  K. Tanimoto On the Compressibility of Granular Layer , 1957 .

[129]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[130]  Christiane Garbay,et al.  p120-Ras GTPase activating protein (RasGAP): a multi-interacting protein in downstream signaling. , 2009, Biochimie.

[131]  Y. Martin,et al.  A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[132]  C. Venkatachalam,et al.  LigScore: a novel scoring function for predicting binding affinities. , 2005, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[133]  Shaomeng Wang,et al.  How Does Consensus Scoring Work for Virtual Library Screening? An Idealized Computer Experiment , 2001, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[134]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[135]  David J. Weber,et al.  Structure of the negative regulatory domain of p53 bound to S100B(ββ) , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[136]  E. Goldsmith,et al.  Docking motif interactions in MAP kinases revealed by hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[137]  Kevin N. Dalby,et al.  Substrate Discrimination among Mitogen-activated Protein Kinases through Distinct Docking Sequence Motifs* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[138]  Eugen Lounkine,et al.  Similarity Searching Using Fingerprints of Molecular Fragments Involved in Protein-Ligand Interactions , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[139]  Hyung-June Woo Calculation of absolute protein-ligand binding constants with the molecular dynamics free energy perturbation method. , 2008, Methods in molecular biology.

[140]  John J. Irwin,et al.  Community benchmarks for virtual screening , 2008, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[141]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Computational Fragment-Based Binding Site Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[142]  Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al.  Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[143]  E. Scholar,et al.  Role of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy , 2005, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[144]  J. Tomasi,et al.  Quantum mechanical continuum solvation models. , 2005, Chemical reviews.

[145]  R S Chaganti,et al.  BCL-6, a POZ/zinc-finger protein, is a sequence-specific transcriptional repressor. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[146]  Elizabeth J. Goldsmith,et al.  Activation Mechanism of the MAP Kinase ERK2 by Dual Phosphorylation , 1997, Cell.

[147]  Martin Hofmann-Apitius,et al.  Alternative to Consensus ScoringA New Approach Toward the Qualitative Combination of Docking Algorithms , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[148]  Paul D. Martin,et al.  AZD6244 (ARRY-142886), a potent inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase 1/2 kinases: mechanism of action in vivo, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship, and potential for combination in preclinical models , 2007, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.

[149]  A. Melnick,et al.  A peptomimetic inhibitor of BCL6 with potent antilymphoma effects in vitro and in vivo. , 2009, Blood.

[150]  Luhua Lai,et al.  Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction , 2002, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[151]  Shugo Nakamura,et al.  Highly accurate method for ligand‐binding site prediction in unbound state (apo) protein structures , 2008, Proteins.

[152]  J. Skolnick,et al.  A threading-based method (FINDSITE) for ligand-binding site prediction and functional annotation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[153]  Tao Jiang,et al.  Accelerated similarity searching and clustering of large compound sets by geometric embedding and locality sensitive hashing , 2010, Bioinform..

[154]  E. Nishida,et al.  A conserved docking motif in MAP kinases common to substrates, activators and regulators , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.

[155]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Binding Response: A Descriptor for Selecting Ligand Binding Site on Protein Surfaces , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[156]  Zhilong Xiu,et al.  Rescoring ligand docking poses. , 2010, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[157]  S. Padmanabhan,et al.  A bacterial antirepressor with SH3 domain topology mimics operator DNA in sequestering the repressor DNA recognition helix , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[158]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Structure-based inhibitor design targeting HIV-1 integrase. , 2002, Current drug targets. Infectious disorders.

[159]  Walter Kolch,et al.  Cell fate decisions are specified by the dynamic ERK interactome , 2009, Nature Cell Biology.

[160]  Christopher R. Corbeil,et al.  Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go , 2008, British journal of pharmacology.

[161]  M. Cobb,et al.  Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathways: regulation and physiological functions. , 2001, Endocrine reviews.

[162]  Ronald P White,et al.  Methods for calculating the entropy and free energy and their application to problems involving protein flexibility and ligand binding. , 2009, Current protein & peptide science.

[163]  Hemaka A. Rajapakse Small molecule inhibitors of the XIAP protein-protein interaction. , 2007, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[164]  Haruki Nakamura,et al.  Prediction of protein-ligand complex structure by docking software guided by other complex structures. , 2008, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[165]  J M Blaney,et al.  A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[166]  P E Bourne,et al.  The Protein Data Bank. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[167]  Reiji Teramoto,et al.  Consensus Scoring with Feature Selection for Structure-Based Virtual Screening , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[168]  Louise A Knight,et al.  The effect of pentamidine on melanoma ex vivo , 2010, Anti-cancer drugs.

[169]  P. Stogios,et al.  Sequence and structural analysis of BTB domain proteins , 2005, Genome Biology.

[170]  Laxmikant V. Kalé,et al.  Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[171]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Quantitative conformationally sampled pharmacophore for delta opioid ligands: reevaluation of hydrophobic moieties essential for biological activity. , 2007, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[172]  Corwin Hansch,et al.  Camptothecins: a SAR/QSAR study. , 2009, Chemical reviews.

[173]  Gregory R. Smith,et al.  GTPase-Activating Proteins for Cdc42 , 2002, Eukaryotic Cell.

[174]  Donald G. Truhlar,et al.  MODEL FOR AQUEOUS SOLVATION BASED ON CLASS IV ATOMIC CHARGES AND FIRST SOLVATION SHELL EFFECTS , 1996 .

[175]  David E. Shaw,et al.  A fast, scalable method for the parallel evaluation of distance‐limited pairwise particle interactions , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[176]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[177]  Irwin D. Kuntz,et al.  Development and validation of a modular, extensible docking program: DOCK 5 , 2006, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[178]  C. Pereira,et al.  Protein Interactions between CD2 and Lck Are Required for the Lipid Raft Distribution of CD21 , 2008, The Journal of Immunology.

[179]  Kam Y. J. Zhang,et al.  Discovery of a selective inhibitor of oncogenic B-Raf kinase with potent antimelanoma activity , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[180]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Automated Selection of Compounds with Physicochemical Properties To Maximize Bioavailability and Druglikeness , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[181]  G. Klebe,et al.  DrugScore(CSD)-knowledge-based scoring function derived from small molecule crystal data with superior recognition rate of near-native ligand poses and better affinity prediction. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[182]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Targeting NAD biosynthesis in bacterial pathogens: Structure-based development of inhibitors of nicotinate mononucleotide adenylyltransferase NadD. , 2009, Chemistry & biology.

[183]  Qiong Shen,et al.  Deregulated BCL6 expression recapitulates the pathogenesis of human diffuse large B cell lymphomas in mice. , 2005, Cancer cell.

[184]  Xicheng Wang,et al.  An improved adaptive genetic algorithm for protein–ligand docking , 2009, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[185]  C. Der,et al.  Targeting the Raf-MEK-ERK mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade for the treatment of cancer , 2007, Oncogene.

[186]  G. Mills,et al.  The chemokine growth-regulated oncogene 1 (Gro-1) links RAS signaling to the senescence of stromal fibroblasts and ovarian tumorigenesis , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[187]  Yongqiang Zhu,et al.  Pharmacophore based drug design approach as a practical process in drug discovery. , 2010, Current computer-aided drug design.

[188]  F. Guerlesquin,et al.  Protein–protein interaction inhibition (2P2I) combining high throughput and virtual screening: Application to the HIV-1 Nef protein , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[189]  P Willett,et al.  Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[190]  Reiji Teramoto,et al.  Supervised Consensus Scoring for Docking and Virtual Screening , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[191]  Renxiao Wang,et al.  The PDBbind database: methodologies and updates. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[192]  J. Avruch,et al.  Protein kinase cascades activated by stress and inflammatory cytokines , 1996, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[193]  L. Vassilev,et al.  Targeting protein–protein interactions for cancer therapy , 2005, Journal of Molecular Medicine.

[194]  Santosh A. Khedkar,et al.  Pharmacophore modeling in drug discovery and development: an overview. , 2007, Medicinal chemistry (Shariqah (United Arab Emirates)).

[195]  Donald J Abraham,et al.  Structure-based drug design strategies in medicinal chemistry. , 2009, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[196]  Brian K. Shoichet,et al.  ZINC - A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[197]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Protein-protein interaction networks: how can a hub protein bind so many different partners? , 2009, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[198]  T. Halgren MMFF VII. Characterization of MMFF94, MMFF94s, and other widely available force fields for conformational energies and for intermolecular‐interaction energies and geometries , 1999, Journal of computational chemistry.

[199]  R. Seger,et al.  Protein-protein interactions in the regulation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase , 2005, Molecular biotechnology.

[200]  P. Hajduk Fragment-based drug design: how big is too big? , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[201]  Ting Wang,et al.  Comparative binding energy analysis for binding affinity and target selectivity prediction , 2010, Proteins.

[202]  Tudor I. Oprea,et al.  Is There a Difference between Leads and Drugs? A Historical Perspective , 2001, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[203]  Irwin D. Kuntz,et al.  A genetic algorithm for structure-based de novo design , 2001, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[204]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Identification and validation of human DNA ligase inhibitors using computer-aided drug design. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[205]  D. Frank Hsu,et al.  Consensus Scoring Criteria for Improving Enrichment in Virtual Screening , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[206]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Improved treatment of the protein backbone in empirical force fields. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[207]  Kerim Babaoglu,et al.  Deconstructing fragment-based inhibitor discovery , 2006, Nature chemical biology.

[208]  Liwei Li,et al.  BioDrugScreen: a computational drug design resource for ranking molecules docked to the human proteome , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[209]  Capucine Picard,et al.  ZAP70: a master regulator of adaptive immunity , 2010, Seminars in Immunopathology.

[210]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  Similarity Searching using Compound Class‐Specific Combinations of Substructures Found in Randomly Generated Molecular Fragment Populations , 2008, ChemMedChem.

[211]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Identification and characterization of small molecule inhibitors of the calcium-dependent S100B-p53 tumor suppressor interaction. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[212]  Donald G. Truhlar,et al.  New Class IV Charge Model for Extracting Accurate Partial Charges from Wave Functions , 1998 .

[213]  H. Lilie,et al.  Crystal structure analysis and solution studies of human Lck-SH3; zinc-induced homodimerization competes with the binding of proline-rich motifs. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[214]  Karthik Raman,et al.  Construction and analysis of protein–protein interaction networks , 2010, Automated experimentation.

[215]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  Combinatorial Preferences Affect Molecular Similarity/Diversity Calculations Using Binary Fingerprints and Tanimoto Coefficients , 2000, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[216]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Using Caenorhabditis elegans as a model organism for evaluating extracellular signal-regulated kinase docking domain inhibitors , 2008, Journal of Cell Communication and Signaling.

[217]  T. Pawson,et al.  A Single Point Mutation Switches the Specificity of Group III Src Homology (SH) 2 Domains to That of Group I SH2 Domains (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[218]  John A. Robinson Beta-hairpin peptidomimetics: design, structures and biological activities. , 2008, Accounts of chemical research.

[219]  Nan Li,et al.  Integrin CD11b negatively regulates TLR-triggered inflammatory responses by activating Syk and promoting degradation of MyD88 and TRIF via Cbl-b , 2010, Nature Immunology.

[220]  J. Berg,et al.  Homodimerization and heterodimerization of minimal zinc(II)-binding-domain peptides of T-cell proteins CD4, CD8alpha, and Lck. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[221]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  CHARMM general force field: A force field for drug‐like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all‐atom additive biological force fields , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[222]  A. Tomillero,et al.  Gateways to clinical trials. , 2010, Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology.

[223]  J. Menéndez,et al.  Peptidomimetics in cancer chemotherapy , 2007, Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico.

[224]  Radha Akella,et al.  Unique MAP Kinase binding sites. , 2008, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[225]  Denis Bouchard,et al.  Mechanism of SMRT corepressor recruitment by the BCL6 BTB domain. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[226]  F. Lombardo,et al.  Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings , 1997 .

[227]  K Offit,et al.  Alterations of a zinc finger-encoding gene, BCL-6, in diffuse large-cell lymphoma. , 1993, Science.

[228]  R. Kroemer Structure-based drug design: docking and scoring. , 2007, Current protein & peptide science.

[229]  Magdalena Bacilieri,et al.  Ligand-based drug design methodologies in drug discovery process: an overview. , 2006, Current drug discovery technologies.

[230]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Identification of small molecular weight inhibitors of Src homology 2 domain-containing tyrosine phosphatase 2 (SHP-2) via in silico database screening combined with experimental assay. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[231]  Olivier Sperandio,et al.  MED-3DMC: a new tool to generate 3D conformation ensembles of small molecules with a Monte Carlo sampling of the conformational space. , 2009, European journal of medicinal chemistry.

[232]  Walter Filgueira de Azevedo,et al.  Molecular docking algorithms. , 2008, Current drug targets.

[233]  E. Nishida,et al.  Identification of a docking groove on ERK and p38 MAP kinases that regulates the specificity of docking interactions , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[234]  Hanoch Senderowitz,et al.  SeleX-CS: A New Consensus Scoring Algorithm for Hit Discovery and Lead Optimization , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[235]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Lead Validation and SAR Development via Chemical Similarity Searching; Application to Compounds Targeting the pY+3 Site of the SH2 Domain of p56lck , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[236]  Alasdair T. R. Laurie,et al.  Methods for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites for structure-based drug design and virtual ligand screening. , 2006, Current protein & peptide science.

[237]  Yu Xia,et al.  Computational reconstruction of protein-protein interaction networks: algorithms and issues. , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.

[238]  J. Blenis,et al.  Characterization of S6K2, a novel kinase homologous to S6K1 , 1999, Oncogene.

[239]  C. Lipinski Drug-like properties and the causes of poor solubility and poor permeability. , 2000, Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods.

[240]  F V Grigoriev,et al.  Computation of the contribution from the cavity effect to protein-ligand binding free energy. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[241]  Jürgen Bajorath,et al.  Design and Evaluation of a Molecular Fingerprint Involving the Transformation of Property Descriptor Values into a Binary Classification Scheme , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[242]  Alexander D. MacKerell,et al.  Identification of non-phosphate-containing small molecular weight inhibitors of the tyrosine kinase p56 Lck SH2 domain via in silico screening against the pY + 3 binding site. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[243]  R. Burton,et al.  Tyr130 phosphorylation triggers Syk release from antigen receptor by long-distance conformational uncoupling , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.