Prospects of Modulating Protein–Protein Interactions
暂无分享,去创建一个
Alexander D. MacKerell | Taiji Oashi | Paul Shapiro | Wenbo Yu | Shijun Zhong | P. Shapiro | Wenbo Yu | Shijun Zhong | T. Oashi
[1] Alexander D. MacKerell. Empirical force fields for biological macromolecules: Overview and issues , 2004, J. Comput. Chem..
[2] Chris M. W. Ho,et al. De Novo Design: Ligand Construction and Prediction of Affinity , 1995 .
[3] G. V. Paolini,et al. Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes , 1997, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[4] J. McCubrey,et al. Targeting the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway with small-molecule inhibitors. , 2008, Current opinion in investigational drugs.
[5] A. Hopfinger,et al. The receptor-dependent QSAR paradigm: an overview of the current state of the art. , 2009, Medicinal chemistry (Shariqah (United Arab Emirates)).
[6] Shuichi Hirono,et al. Comparison of Consensus Scoring Strategies for Evaluating Computational Models of Protein-Ligand Complexes , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[7] William Seibel,et al. Theoretical and practical considerations in virtual screening: a beaten field? , 2008, Current medicinal chemistry.
[8] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. Rational design of human DNA ligase inhibitors that target cellular DNA replication and repair. , 2008, Cancer research.
[9] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. A small-molecule inhibitor of BCL6 kills DLBCL cells in vitro and in vivo. , 2010, Cancer cell.
[10] Richard A. Lewis,et al. Three-dimensional pharmacophore methods in drug discovery. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[11] David J Weber,et al. Interaction of Dimeric S100B(ββ) with the Tumor Suppressor Protein p53: A Model for Ca2+-Dependent S100-Target Protein Interactions , 2000 .
[12] Tony Pawson,et al. SH2 domain specificity and activity modified by a single residue , 1994, Nature.
[13] Michelle R. Arkin,et al. Small-molecule inhibitors of protein–protein interactions: progressing towards the dream , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.
[14] B. H. Ye,et al. BCL-6 in the Pathogenesis of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma , 2000, Cancer investigation.
[15] W. V. Gunsteren,et al. Validation of the 53A6 GROMOS force field , 2005, European Biophysics Journal.
[16] Bo Zhou,et al. Structural basis of docking interactions between ERK2 and MAP kinase phosphatase 3. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[17] B. Shoichet,et al. Molecular docking and ligand specificity in fragment-based inhibitor discovery. , 2009, Nature chemical biology.
[18] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. POSE SCALING: GEOMETRICAL ASSESSMENT OF LIGAND BINDING POSES , 2008 .
[19] Lenwood S. Heath,et al. H++: a server for estimating pKas and adding missing hydrogens to macromolecules , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..
[20] Nicolas Moitessier,et al. Docking Ligands into Flexible and Solvated Macromolecules. 4. Are Popular Scoring Functions Accurate for this Class of Proteins? , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[21] Principles and methods of docking and ligand design. , 2003, Methods of biochemical analysis.
[22] Song Liu,et al. A knowledge-based energy function for protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-DNA complexes. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[23] Jianpeng Ma,et al. CHARMM: The biomolecular simulation program , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..
[24] L. Kelley,et al. An automated approach for clustering an ensemble of NMR-derived protein structures into conformationally related subfamilies. , 1996, Protein engineering.
[25] Maciej Haranczyk,et al. Comparison of Nonbinary Similarity Coefficients for Similarity Searching, Clustering and Compound Selection , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[26] B. Zhao,et al. Loops Govern SH2 Domain Specificity by Controlling Access to Binding Pockets , 2010, Science Signaling.
[27] D. van der Spoel,et al. Blind docking of drug‐sized compounds to proteins with up to a thousand residues , 2006, FEBS letters.
[28] I. Muegge. PMF scoring revisited. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[29] Guillaume Bouvier,et al. Automatic clustering of docking poses in virtual screening process using self-organizing map , 2010, Bioinform..
[30] A. Adjei,et al. Advances in Targeting the Ras/Raf/MEK/Erk Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Cascade with MEK Inhibitors for Cancer Therapy , 2008, Clinical Cancer Research.
[31] R. Abagyan,et al. Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative. , 2008, Current opinion in structural biology.
[32] P. Chrobak,et al. HIV-1 Nef Disrupts Maturation of CD4+ T Cells through CD4/Lck Modulation , 2010, The Journal of Immunology.
[33] B. Ma,et al. Binding interactions between the core central domain of 16S rRNA and the ribosomal protein S15 determined by molecular dynamics simulations. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.
[34] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. , 1998, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[35] Ernst-Walter Knapp,et al. Improved pKa prediction: Combining empirical and semimicroscopic methods , 2008, J. Comput. Chem..
[36] P. Yue,et al. Coordination complex SH2 domain proteomimetics: an alternative approach to disrupting oncogenic protein-protein interactions. , 2010, Chemical communications.
[37] Anton J. Hopfinger,et al. 4D-QSAR: Perspectives in Drug Design , 2010, Molecules.
[38] Dusanka Janezic,et al. Protein-Protein Binding-Sites Prediction by Protein Surface Structure Conservation , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[39] Jitender Verma,et al. 3D-QSAR in drug design--a review. , 2010, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.
[40] D. Sprous,et al. QSAR in the pharmaceutical research setting: QSAR models for broad, large problems. , 2010, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.
[41] Jiro Shimada,et al. Bootstrap-Based Consensus Scoring Method for Protein-Ligand Docking , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[42] Wilfred F. van Gunsteren,et al. Basic ingredients of free energy calculations: A review , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..
[43] Patrizia Crivori,et al. Virtual screening to enrich a compound collection with CDK2 inhibitors using docking, scoring, and composite scoring models , 2005, Proteins.
[44] G. Harauz,et al. The classic basic protein of myelin--conserved structural motifs and the dynamic molecular barcode involved in membrane adhesion and protein-protein interactions. , 2009, Current protein & peptide science.
[45] S. Feller,et al. Swiprosin-1/EFhd2 Controls B Cell Receptor Signaling through the Assembly of the B Cell Receptor, Syk, and Phospholipase C γ2 in Membrane Rafts , 2010, The Journal of Immunology.
[46] Uko Maran,et al. Drug efficiency indices for improvement of molecular docking scoring functions , 2010, J. Comput. Chem..
[47] I. Kuntz. Structure-Based Strategies for Drug Design and Discovery , 1992, Science.
[48] R. Cramer,et al. Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. , 1988, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[49] T. Steinbrecher,et al. Towards accurate free energy calculations in ligand protein-binding studies. , 2010, Current medicinal chemistry.
[50] C L Brooks,et al. Ligand-protein database: linking protein-ligand complex structures to binding data. , 2001, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[51] Supot Hannongbua,et al. Accurate prediction of protonation state as a prerequisite for reliable MM‐PB(GB)SA binding free energy calculations of HIV‐1 protease inhibitors , 2008, J. Comput. Chem..
[52] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Molecular Fingerprint Recombination: Generating Hybrid Fingerprints for Similarity Searching from Different Fingerprint Types , 2009, ChemMedChem.
[53] Matthew P. Repasky,et al. Glide: a new approach for rapid, accurate docking and scoring. 1. Method and assessment of docking accuracy. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[54] James G. Nourse,et al. Reoptimization of MDL Keys for Use in Drug Discovery , 2002, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[55] L. Staudt,et al. Control of inflammation, cytokine expression, and germinal center formation by BCL-6. , 1997, Science.
[56] Ray A. Jarvis,et al. Clustering Using a Similarity Measure Based on Shared Near Neighbors , 1973, IEEE Transactions on Computers.
[57] Jonathan D Hirst,et al. Machine learning in virtual screening. , 2009, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.
[58] J. M. Bradshaw,et al. The Src, Syk, and Tec family kinases: distinct types of molecular switches. , 2010, Cellular signalling.
[59] J. Irwin,et al. Benchmarking sets for molecular docking. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[60] Jason C. Cole,et al. Testing Assumptions and Hypotheses for Rescoring Success in Protein-Ligand Docking , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[61] J. Licht,et al. Specific peptide interference reveals BCL6 transcriptional and oncogenic mechanisms in B-cell lymphoma cells , 2004, Nature Medicine.
[62] Charles L. Brooks,et al. λ‐Dynamics free energy simulation methods , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..
[63] José A. Encinar,et al. ADAN: a database for prediction of protein-protein interaction of modular domains mediated by linear motifs , 2009, Bioinform..
[64] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. Computational identification of inhibitors of protein-protein interactions. , 2007, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.
[65] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. Consideration of Molecular Weight during Compound Selection in Virtual Target-Based Database Screening , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[66] Huanxiang Liu,et al. A novel method for protein‐ligand binding affinity prediction and the related descriptors exploration , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..
[67] Xavier Morelli,et al. GFscore: A General Nonlinear Consensus Scoring Function for High-Throughput Docking , 2006, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[68] W. Cai,et al. SHEF: a vHTS geometrical filter using coefficients of spherical harmonic molecular surfaces , 2008, Journal of molecular modeling.
[69] G. Klebe,et al. Molecular similarity indices in a comparative analysis (CoMSIA) of drug molecules to correlate and predict their biological activity. , 1994, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[70] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. Molecular switch controlling the binding of anionic bile acid conjugates to human apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[71] A. Tomillero,et al. Gateways to clinical trials. December 2008. , 2008, Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology.
[72] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. Recent advances in ligand-based drug design: relevance and utility of the conformationally sampled pharmacophore approach. , 2011, Current computer-aided drug design.
[73] A. di Nola,et al. Docking of flexible ligands to flexible receptors in solution by molecular dynamics simulation , 1999, Proteins.
[74] I. Jang,et al. Grb2, a simple adapter with complex roles in lymphocyte development, function, and signaling , 2009, Immunological reviews.
[75] P. Goodford. A computational procedure for determining energetically favorable binding sites on biologically important macromolecules. , 1985, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[76] E. Shakhnovich,et al. SMoG: de Novo Design Method Based on Simple, Fast, and Accurate Free Energy Estimates. 1. Methodology and Supporting Evidence , 1996 .
[77] Stephen L. Abrams,et al. Roles of the Raf/MEK/ERK pathway in cell growth, malignant transformation and drug resistance. , 2007, Biochimica et biophysica acta.
[78] Rebecca C. Wade,et al. Improving the Continuum Dielectric Approach to Calculating pKas of Ionizable Groups in Proteins , 1996 .
[79] Yury N. Vorobjev,et al. Blind docking method combining search of low‐resolution binding sites with ligand pose refinement by molecular dynamics‐based global optimization , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..
[80] Xicheng Wang,et al. An effective docking strategy for virtual screening based on multi-objective optimization algorithm , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.
[81] Hans-Joachim Böhm,et al. LUDI: rule-based automatic design of new substituents for enzyme inhibitor leads , 1992, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[82] SHENG-YOU HUANG,et al. An iterative knowledge‐based scoring function to predict protein–ligand interactions: I. Derivation of interaction potentials , 2006, J. Comput. Chem..
[83] W. L. Jorgensen,et al. The OPLS [optimized potentials for liquid simulations] potential functions for proteins, energy minimizations for crystals of cyclic peptides and crambin. , 1988, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[84] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. Computational ligand-based rational design: Role of conformational sampling and force fields in model development. , 2011, MedChemComm.
[85] Philippe Roche,et al. Atomic Analysis of Protein-Protein Interfaces with Known Inhibitors: The 2P2I Database , 2010, PloS one.
[86] Y. Natkunam,et al. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase positively regulates the oncogenic activity of MCT-1 in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. , 2009, Cancer research.
[87] Marc F Lensink,et al. Blind predictions of protein interfaces by docking calculations in CAPRI , 2010, Proteins.
[88] David J Weber,et al. Solution structure of rat apo-S100B(beta beta) as determined by NMR spectroscopy. , 1996, Biochemistry.
[89] A. Melnick,et al. Structure of a BCOR corepressor peptide in complex with the BCL6 BTB domain dimer. , 2008, Molecular cell.
[90] J. Hartwig,et al. A novel interaction between FlnA and Syk regulates platelet ITAM-mediated receptor signaling and function , 2010, The Journal of experimental medicine.
[91] R. Bahadur,et al. The interface of protein-protein complexes: Analysis of contacts and prediction of interactions , 2008, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.
[92] Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al. Ligand docking and structure-based virtual screening in drug discovery. , 2007, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.
[93] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. Identification of novel extracellular signal-regulated kinase docking domain inhibitors. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[94] Leonid A. Mirny,et al. Using genome-wide measurements for computational prediction of SH2–peptide interactions , 2009, Nucleic acids research.
[95] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. Divalent metal ion complexes of S100B in the absence and presence of pentamidine. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.
[96] David J Weber,et al. Inhibiting S100B Restores p53 Levels in Primary Malignant Melanoma Cancer Cells* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[97] R. Sherwood,et al. Serum S‐100 protein: a potentially useful prognostic marker in cutaneous melanoma , 1997 .
[98] Richard D. Taylor,et al. Improved protein–ligand docking using GOLD , 2003, Proteins.
[99] Gennady M Verkhivker,et al. Molecular recognition of the inhibitor AG-1343 by HIV-1 protease: conformationally flexible docking by evolutionary programming. , 1995, Chemistry & biology.
[100] Elizabeth J. Goldsmith,et al. Atomic structure of the MAP kinase ERK2 at 2.3 Å resolution , 1994, Nature.
[101] David J Weber,et al. Solution structure of calcium-bound rat S100B(betabeta) as determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy,. , 1998, Biochemistry.
[102] Kengo Kinoshita,et al. Ligand-binding site prediction of proteins based on known fragment–fragment interactions , 2010, Bioinform..
[103] Hans-Joachim Böhm,et al. The development of a simple empirical scoring function to estimate the binding constant for a protein-ligand complex of known three-dimensional structure , 1994, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[104] Vladimir Potemkin,et al. Principles for 3D/4D QSAR classification of drugs. , 2008, Drug discovery today.
[105] P. Defossez,et al. Born to bind: the BTB protein–protein interaction domain , 2006, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.
[106] Holger Gohlke,et al. The Amber biomolecular simulation programs , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..
[107] Jong-In Park,et al. Noncatalytic Function of ERK1/2 Can Promote Raf/MEK/ERK-mediated Growth Arrest Signaling* , 2009, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[108] Todd J. A. Ewing,et al. DOCK 4.0: Search strategies for automated molecular docking of flexible molecule databases , 2001, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[109] Dirk Neumann,et al. A new Lamarckian genetic algorithm for flexible ligand‐receptor docking , 2010, J. Comput. Chem..
[110] W. Kolch. Coordinating ERK/MAPK signalling through scaffolds and inhibitors , 2005, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.
[111] David G. Lloyd,et al. Unbiasing Scoring Functions: A New Normalization and Rescoring Strategy , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[112] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. Characterization of ATP-independent ERK inhibitors identified through in silico analysis of the active ERK2 structure. , 2006, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.
[113] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. Reproducing Crystal Binding Modes of Ligand Functional Groups Using Site-Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation (SILCS) Simulations , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[114] Ignacio J General. A Note on the Standard State's Binding Free Energy. , 2010, Journal of chemical theory and computation.
[115] Alexander Zawaira,et al. Computational analyses of the surface properties of protein–protein interfaces , 2006, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.
[116] Nagasuma Chandra,et al. PocketDepth: a new depth based algorithm for identification of ligand binding sites in proteins. , 2008, Journal of structural biology.
[117] J. Richardson,et al. Asparagine and glutamine: using hydrogen atom contacts in the choice of side-chain amide orientation. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.
[118] Michael K. Gilson,et al. Theory of free energy and entropy in noncovalent binding. , 2009, Chemical reviews.
[119] A. Pozzan,et al. Molecular descriptors and methods for ligand based virtual high throughput screening in drug discovery. , 2006, Current pharmaceutical design.
[120] P. Kollman,et al. A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules , 1995 .
[121] Gerrit Groenhof,et al. GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..
[122] R L Juliano,et al. Macromolecular therapeutics: emerging strategies for drug discovery in the postgenome era. , 2001, Molecular interventions.
[123] Razvan C. Bunescu,et al. Consolidating the set of known human protein-protein interactions in preparation for large-scale mapping of the human interactome , 2005, Genome Biology.
[124] R. Seger,et al. The extracellular signal-regulated kinase: Multiple substrates regulate diverse cellular functions , 2006, Growth factors.
[125] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. Design of Inhibitors for S100B. , 2005, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.
[126] David J Weber,et al. Solution NMR structure of S100B bound to the high-affinity target peptide TRTK-12. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.
[127] J A Wells,et al. Binding in the growth hormone receptor complex. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[128] K. Tanimoto. On the Compressibility of Granular Layer , 1957 .
[129] David S. Goodsell,et al. AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..
[130] Christiane Garbay,et al. p120-Ras GTPase activating protein (RasGAP): a multi-interacting protein in downstream signaling. , 2009, Biochimie.
[131] Y. Martin,et al. A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[132] C. Venkatachalam,et al. LigScore: a novel scoring function for predicting binding affinities. , 2005, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[133] Shaomeng Wang,et al. How Does Consensus Scoring Work for Virtual Library Screening? An Idealized Computer Experiment , 2001, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[134] Leo Breiman,et al. Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.
[135] David J. Weber,et al. Structure of the negative regulatory domain of p53 bound to S100B(ββ) , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.
[136] E. Goldsmith,et al. Docking motif interactions in MAP kinases revealed by hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry. , 2004, Molecular cell.
[137] Kevin N. Dalby,et al. Substrate Discrimination among Mitogen-activated Protein Kinases through Distinct Docking Sequence Motifs* , 2008, Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[138] Eugen Lounkine,et al. Similarity Searching Using Fingerprints of Molecular Fragments Involved in Protein-Ligand Interactions , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[139] Hyung-June Woo. Calculation of absolute protein-ligand binding constants with the molecular dynamics free energy perturbation method. , 2008, Methods in molecular biology.
[140] John J. Irwin,et al. Community benchmarks for virtual screening , 2008, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[141] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. Computational Fragment-Based Binding Site Identification by Ligand Competitive Saturation , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[142] Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.
[143] E. Scholar,et al. Role of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Cancer Therapy , 2005, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.
[144] J. Tomasi,et al. Quantum mechanical continuum solvation models. , 2005, Chemical reviews.
[145] R S Chaganti,et al. BCL-6, a POZ/zinc-finger protein, is a sequence-specific transcriptional repressor. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[146] Elizabeth J. Goldsmith,et al. Activation Mechanism of the MAP Kinase ERK2 by Dual Phosphorylation , 1997, Cell.
[147] Martin Hofmann-Apitius,et al. Alternative to Consensus ScoringA New Approach Toward the Qualitative Combination of Docking Algorithms , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[148] Paul D. Martin,et al. AZD6244 (ARRY-142886), a potent inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase 1/2 kinases: mechanism of action in vivo, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship, and potential for combination in preclinical models , 2007, Molecular Cancer Therapeutics.
[149] A. Melnick,et al. A peptomimetic inhibitor of BCL6 with potent antilymphoma effects in vitro and in vivo. , 2009, Blood.
[150] Luhua Lai,et al. Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction , 2002, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[151] Shugo Nakamura,et al. Highly accurate method for ligand‐binding site prediction in unbound state (apo) protein structures , 2008, Proteins.
[152] J. Skolnick,et al. A threading-based method (FINDSITE) for ligand-binding site prediction and functional annotation , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[153] Tao Jiang,et al. Accelerated similarity searching and clustering of large compound sets by geometric embedding and locality sensitive hashing , 2010, Bioinform..
[154] E. Nishida,et al. A conserved docking motif in MAP kinases common to substrates, activators and regulators , 2000, Nature Cell Biology.
[155] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. Binding Response: A Descriptor for Selecting Ligand Binding Site on Protein Surfaces , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[156] Zhilong Xiu,et al. Rescoring ligand docking poses. , 2010, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.
[157] S. Padmanabhan,et al. A bacterial antirepressor with SH3 domain topology mimics operator DNA in sequestering the repressor DNA recognition helix , 2010, Nucleic acids research.
[158] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. Structure-based inhibitor design targeting HIV-1 integrase. , 2002, Current drug targets. Infectious disorders.
[159] Walter Kolch,et al. Cell fate decisions are specified by the dynamic ERK interactome , 2009, Nature Cell Biology.
[160] Christopher R. Corbeil,et al. Towards the development of universal, fast and highly accurate docking/scoring methods: a long way to go , 2008, British journal of pharmacology.
[161] M. Cobb,et al. Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathways: regulation and physiological functions. , 2001, Endocrine reviews.
[162] Ronald P White,et al. Methods for calculating the entropy and free energy and their application to problems involving protein flexibility and ligand binding. , 2009, Current protein & peptide science.
[163] Hemaka A. Rajapakse. Small molecule inhibitors of the XIAP protein-protein interaction. , 2007, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.
[164] Haruki Nakamura,et al. Prediction of protein-ligand complex structure by docking software guided by other complex structures. , 2008, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.
[165] J M Blaney,et al. A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.
[166] P E Bourne,et al. The Protein Data Bank. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.
[167] Reiji Teramoto,et al. Consensus Scoring with Feature Selection for Structure-Based Virtual Screening , 2008, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[168] Louise A Knight,et al. The effect of pentamidine on melanoma ex vivo , 2010, Anti-cancer drugs.
[169] P. Stogios,et al. Sequence and structural analysis of BTB domain proteins , 2005, Genome Biology.
[170] Laxmikant V. Kalé,et al. Scalable molecular dynamics with NAMD , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..
[171] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. Quantitative conformationally sampled pharmacophore for delta opioid ligands: reevaluation of hydrophobic moieties essential for biological activity. , 2007, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[172] Corwin Hansch,et al. Camptothecins: a SAR/QSAR study. , 2009, Chemical reviews.
[173] Gregory R. Smith,et al. GTPase-Activating Proteins for Cdc42 , 2002, Eukaryotic Cell.
[174] Donald G. Truhlar,et al. MODEL FOR AQUEOUS SOLVATION BASED ON CLASS IV ATOMIC CHARGES AND FIRST SOLVATION SHELL EFFECTS , 1996 .
[175] David E. Shaw,et al. A fast, scalable method for the parallel evaluation of distance‐limited pairwise particle interactions , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..
[176] Thomas Lengauer,et al. A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.
[177] Irwin D. Kuntz,et al. Development and validation of a modular, extensible docking program: DOCK 5 , 2006, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[178] C. Pereira,et al. Protein Interactions between CD2 and Lck Are Required for the Lipid Raft Distribution of CD21 , 2008, The Journal of Immunology.
[179] Kam Y. J. Zhang,et al. Discovery of a selective inhibitor of oncogenic B-Raf kinase with potent antimelanoma activity , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[180] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. Automated Selection of Compounds with Physicochemical Properties To Maximize Bioavailability and Druglikeness , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[181] G. Klebe,et al. DrugScore(CSD)-knowledge-based scoring function derived from small molecule crystal data with superior recognition rate of near-native ligand poses and better affinity prediction. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[182] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. Targeting NAD biosynthesis in bacterial pathogens: Structure-based development of inhibitors of nicotinate mononucleotide adenylyltransferase NadD. , 2009, Chemistry & biology.
[183] Qiong Shen,et al. Deregulated BCL6 expression recapitulates the pathogenesis of human diffuse large B cell lymphomas in mice. , 2005, Cancer cell.
[184] Xicheng Wang,et al. An improved adaptive genetic algorithm for protein–ligand docking , 2009, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[185] C. Der,et al. Targeting the Raf-MEK-ERK mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade for the treatment of cancer , 2007, Oncogene.
[186] G. Mills,et al. The chemokine growth-regulated oncogene 1 (Gro-1) links RAS signaling to the senescence of stromal fibroblasts and ovarian tumorigenesis , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[187] Yongqiang Zhu,et al. Pharmacophore based drug design approach as a practical process in drug discovery. , 2010, Current computer-aided drug design.
[188] F. Guerlesquin,et al. Protein–protein interaction inhibition (2P2I) combining high throughput and virtual screening: Application to the HIV-1 Nef protein , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[189] P Willett,et al. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.
[190] Reiji Teramoto,et al. Supervised Consensus Scoring for Docking and Virtual Screening , 2007, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[191] Renxiao Wang,et al. The PDBbind database: methodologies and updates. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[192] J. Avruch,et al. Protein kinase cascades activated by stress and inflammatory cytokines , 1996, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.
[193] L. Vassilev,et al. Targeting protein–protein interactions for cancer therapy , 2005, Journal of Molecular Medicine.
[194] Santosh A. Khedkar,et al. Pharmacophore modeling in drug discovery and development: an overview. , 2007, Medicinal chemistry (Shariqah (United Arab Emirates)).
[195] Donald J Abraham,et al. Structure-based drug design strategies in medicinal chemistry. , 2009, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.
[196] Brian K. Shoichet,et al. ZINC - A Free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[197] R. Nussinov,et al. Protein-protein interaction networks: how can a hub protein bind so many different partners? , 2009, Trends in biochemical sciences.
[198] T. Halgren. MMFF VII. Characterization of MMFF94, MMFF94s, and other widely available force fields for conformational energies and for intermolecular‐interaction energies and geometries , 1999, Journal of computational chemistry.
[199] R. Seger,et al. Protein-protein interactions in the regulation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase , 2005, Molecular biotechnology.
[200] P. Hajduk. Fragment-based drug design: how big is too big? , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[201] Ting Wang,et al. Comparative binding energy analysis for binding affinity and target selectivity prediction , 2010, Proteins.
[202] Tudor I. Oprea,et al. Is There a Difference between Leads and Drugs? A Historical Perspective , 2001, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[203] Irwin D. Kuntz,et al. A genetic algorithm for structure-based de novo design , 2001, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..
[204] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. Identification and validation of human DNA ligase inhibitors using computer-aided drug design. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[205] D. Frank Hsu,et al. Consensus Scoring Criteria for Improving Enrichment in Virtual Screening , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[206] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. Improved treatment of the protein backbone in empirical force fields. , 2004, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[207] Kerim Babaoglu,et al. Deconstructing fragment-based inhibitor discovery , 2006, Nature chemical biology.
[208] Liwei Li,et al. BioDrugScreen: a computational drug design resource for ranking molecules docked to the human proteome , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..
[209] Capucine Picard,et al. ZAP70: a master regulator of adaptive immunity , 2010, Seminars in Immunopathology.
[210] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Similarity Searching using Compound Class‐Specific Combinations of Substructures Found in Randomly Generated Molecular Fragment Populations , 2008, ChemMedChem.
[211] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. Identification and characterization of small molecule inhibitors of the calcium-dependent S100B-p53 tumor suppressor interaction. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[212] Donald G. Truhlar,et al. New Class IV Charge Model for Extracting Accurate Partial Charges from Wave Functions , 1998 .
[213] H. Lilie,et al. Crystal structure analysis and solution studies of human Lck-SH3; zinc-induced homodimerization competes with the binding of proline-rich motifs. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.
[214] Karthik Raman,et al. Construction and analysis of protein–protein interaction networks , 2010, Automated experimentation.
[215] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Combinatorial Preferences Affect Molecular Similarity/Diversity Calculations Using Binary Fingerprints and Tanimoto Coefficients , 2000, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[216] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. Using Caenorhabditis elegans as a model organism for evaluating extracellular signal-regulated kinase docking domain inhibitors , 2008, Journal of Cell Communication and Signaling.
[217] T. Pawson,et al. A Single Point Mutation Switches the Specificity of Group III Src Homology (SH) 2 Domains to That of Group I SH2 Domains (*) , 1995, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.
[218] John A. Robinson. Beta-hairpin peptidomimetics: design, structures and biological activities. , 2008, Accounts of chemical research.
[219] Nan Li,et al. Integrin CD11b negatively regulates TLR-triggered inflammatory responses by activating Syk and promoting degradation of MyD88 and TRIF via Cbl-b , 2010, Nature Immunology.
[220] J. Berg,et al. Homodimerization and heterodimerization of minimal zinc(II)-binding-domain peptides of T-cell proteins CD4, CD8alpha, and Lck. , 2009, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[221] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. CHARMM general force field: A force field for drug‐like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all‐atom additive biological force fields , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..
[222] A. Tomillero,et al. Gateways to clinical trials. , 2010, Methods and findings in experimental and clinical pharmacology.
[223] J. Menéndez,et al. Peptidomimetics in cancer chemotherapy , 2007, Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico.
[224] Radha Akella,et al. Unique MAP Kinase binding sites. , 2008, Biochimica et biophysica acta.
[225] Denis Bouchard,et al. Mechanism of SMRT corepressor recruitment by the BCL6 BTB domain. , 2003, Molecular cell.
[226] F. Lombardo,et al. Experimental and computational approaches to estimate solubility and permeability in drug discovery and development settings , 1997 .
[227] K Offit,et al. Alterations of a zinc finger-encoding gene, BCL-6, in diffuse large-cell lymphoma. , 1993, Science.
[228] R. Kroemer. Structure-based drug design: docking and scoring. , 2007, Current protein & peptide science.
[229] Magdalena Bacilieri,et al. Ligand-based drug design methodologies in drug discovery process: an overview. , 2006, Current drug discovery technologies.
[230] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. Identification of small molecular weight inhibitors of Src homology 2 domain-containing tyrosine phosphatase 2 (SHP-2) via in silico database screening combined with experimental assay. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[231] Olivier Sperandio,et al. MED-3DMC: a new tool to generate 3D conformation ensembles of small molecules with a Monte Carlo sampling of the conformational space. , 2009, European journal of medicinal chemistry.
[232] Walter Filgueira de Azevedo,et al. Molecular docking algorithms. , 2008, Current drug targets.
[233] E. Nishida,et al. Identification of a docking groove on ERK and p38 MAP kinases that regulates the specificity of docking interactions , 2001, The EMBO journal.
[234] Hanoch Senderowitz,et al. SeleX-CS: A New Consensus Scoring Algorithm for Hit Discovery and Lead Optimization , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[235] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. Lead Validation and SAR Development via Chemical Similarity Searching; Application to Compounds Targeting the pY+3 Site of the SH2 Domain of p56lck , 2005, J. Chem. Inf. Model..
[236] Alasdair T. R. Laurie,et al. Methods for the prediction of protein-ligand binding sites for structure-based drug design and virtual ligand screening. , 2006, Current protein & peptide science.
[237] Yu Xia,et al. Computational reconstruction of protein-protein interaction networks: algorithms and issues. , 2009, Methods in molecular biology.
[238] J. Blenis,et al. Characterization of S6K2, a novel kinase homologous to S6K1 , 1999, Oncogene.
[239] C. Lipinski. Drug-like properties and the causes of poor solubility and poor permeability. , 2000, Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods.
[240] F V Grigoriev,et al. Computation of the contribution from the cavity effect to protein-ligand binding free energy. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. B.
[241] Jürgen Bajorath,et al. Design and Evaluation of a Molecular Fingerprint Involving the Transformation of Property Descriptor Values into a Binary Classification Scheme , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..
[242] Alexander D. MacKerell,et al. Identification of non-phosphate-containing small molecular weight inhibitors of the tyrosine kinase p56 Lck SH2 domain via in silico screening against the pY + 3 binding site. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[243] R. Burton,et al. Tyr130 phosphorylation triggers Syk release from antigen receptor by long-distance conformational uncoupling , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.