A Cyberphysical System Based Mass-Customization Approach with Integration of Industry 4.0 and Smart City

Smart city is a city which is designed to meet the people’s demands. In addition to use of sources efficiently, trends of people are also a need that smart city should meet. Buying personalized products in a cheap and fast way is a demand of people of today. Mass customization, which is defined as the personalization of products, achieves making the tailor-made products cheaper. In this study, we propose a new approach for mass customization with the integration of smart retail and smart production. With removing the operators and actualizing the progress autonomously, it is aimed to reduce the waiting time of customers. Because less waiting time means that there are more mass-customization customers, and this is expected to increase the popularity of mass customization. Thus, reducing wastes and increasing productivity are aimed. This study also constitutes the infrastructure that enables a production system to autonomously perform all stages from order to delivery. With the given scenarios, challenges and advantages of desired approach are discussed.

[1]  Andres Ojamaa,et al.  Developing a Lean Mass Customization Based Manufacturing , 2013, 2013 IEEE 16th International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering.

[2]  Anna Corinna Cagliano,et al.  Current trends in Smart City initiatives: some stylised facts , 2014 .

[3]  Rini Akmeliawati,et al.  Assistive technology for relieving communication lumber between hearing/speech impaired and hearing people , 2014 .

[4]  Mehmet Karaköse,et al.  An investigation for benefits of cyber-physical systems in higher education courses , 2016, 2016 15th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET).

[5]  Mehmet Karakose,et al.  Adaptive Vision Based Condition Monitoring and Fault Detection Method for Multi Robots at Production Lines in Industrial Systems , 2016 .

[6]  Fatos Xhafa,et al.  Modern approaches to modeling user requirements on resource and task allocation in hierarchical computational grids , 2011, Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci..

[7]  G. Paquet,et al.  E-Governance and Smart Communities , 2001 .

[8]  Annalisa Cocchia.  Smart and Digital City: A Systematic Literature Review , 2014 .

[9]  Andrzej J. Kasinski,et al.  Visual simultaneous localisation and map-building supported by structured landmarks , 2010, Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci..

[10]  J. Millard,et al.  Mapping Smart Cities in the EU , 2014 .

[11]  Saman Taghavi Zargar,et al.  A Survey of Defense Mechanisms Against Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Flooding Attacks , 2013, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[12]  Bamidele Adebisi,et al.  Smart-agent system for flexible, personalised transport service , 2016 .

[13]  R. Hollands.  Will the real smart city please stand up? , 2008, The Routledge Companion to Smart Cities.

[14]  Mike Surridge,et al.  Resilient critical infrastructure management with a service oriented architecture: A test case using airport collaborative decision making , 2011, Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci..

[15]  Sanjiv Kumar Jain,et al.  A literature review of lean manufacturing , 2013 .

[16]  Nathalie Mitton,et al.  Cyber-Physical Objects as Key Elements for a Smart Cyber-City , 2016, Management of Cyber Physical Objects in the Future Internet of Things.

[17]  Alagan Anpalagan,et al.  Network Challenges for Cyber Physical Systems with Tiny Wireless Devices: A Case Study on Reliable Pipeline Condition Monitoring , 2015, Sensors.

[18]  Mehmet Karakose,et al.  Reinforcement Learning Based Artificial Immune Classifier , 2013, TheScientificWorldJournal.