The Effect of Dynamic Testing With Electronic Prompts and Scaffolds on Children’s Inductive Reasoning: A Microgenetic Study

The study aimed to gain insight into children’s variability in inductive reasoning problem-solving strategies. Visual–spatial series completion tasks were employed that drew on the novel use of electronic tangibles. Two approaches were contrasted: repeated practice alone and repeated practice with the addition of dynamic training. Participants were 38 children aged 6–9 years, who were allocated to 1 of 2 treatment conditions. In condition one, children had opportunities for repeated practice on 4 sessions. The children in the second condition received the same repeated practice sessions but, in addition, were also provided with training. Transfer of learning was measured before and after the practice and training sessions. During the sessions, the children were presented with series completion tasks using tangible objects, each time with a 1–week interval. In comparison with the repeated practice alone condition, the children with additional training showed significantly greater gains in performance (accuracy and efficiency). Findings clearly showed inter- and intravariability in children’s use of problem-solving strategies, which decreased after training. There was evidence of transfer of inductive reasoning from the original series completion task (using concrete, discrete elements) to a series completion task with numbers and geometric forms. In summary, this study revealed individual differences and variability in the sorts of help required, (more) stable progression of these results, and the child’s ability to transfer learning to novel tasks and situations.

[1]  K. Crowley,et al.  The microgenetic method. A direct means for studying cognitive development. , 1991, The American psychologist.

[2]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  The Import of Knowledge Export: Connecting Findings and Theories of Transfer of Learning , 2012 .

[3]  Ann L. Brown Learning, remembering, and understanding , 1982 .

[4]  J. Elliott Dynamic Assessment in Educational Settings: Realising potential , 2003 .

[5]  W. Resing Dynamic Testing and Individualized Instruction: Helpful in Cognitive Education? , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology.

[6]  Hosenfeld,et al.  Indicators of Discontinuous Change in the Development of Analogical Reasoning , 1997, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[7]  G. Phye,et al.  Inductive Reasoning: A Training Approach , 2008 .

[8]  Erika Tunteler,et al.  Spontaneous analogical transfer in 4-year-olds: a microgenetic study. , 2002, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[9]  R. Siegler,et al.  Intellectual development in childhood , 2000 .

[10]  Carol S. Lidz,et al.  Dynamic Assessment in Practice: Clinical and Educational Applications , 2006 .

[11]  Erika Tunteler,et al.  Inter- and intra-individual variability in the process of change in the use of analogical strategies to solve geometric tasks in children: A microgenetic analysis , 2008 .

[12]  R. Siegler,et al.  How Does Change Occur: A Microgenetic Study of Number Conservation , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[13]  D. Fuchs,et al.  What We Need to Know about Responsiveness to Intervention (and Shouldn't Be Afraid to Ask). , 2007 .

[14]  K. Singer-Freeman Analogical Reasoning in 2-Year-Olds: The Development of Access and Relational Inference. , 2005 .

[15]  B. Rittle-Johnson,et al.  Promoting transfer: effects of self-explanation and direct instruction. , 2006, Child development.

[16]  Emile H. L. Aarts,et al.  In-game assessment and training of nonverbal cognitive skills using TagTiles , 2012, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[17]  Erika Tunteler,et al.  Change in Spontaneous Analogical Transfer in Young Children: A Microgenetic Study. , 2007 .

[18]  Allison Druin,et al.  Tangible user interfaces for children , 2005, CHI EA '05.

[19]  Erika Tunteler,et al.  Effects of prior assistance in using analogies on young children's unprompted analogical problem solving over time: a microgenetic study. , 2007, The British journal of educational psychology.

[20]  Elena L Grigorenko,et al.  Dynamic Assessment and Response to Intervention , 2009, Journal of learning disabilities.

[21]  Jiao Jian-li Literature Review in Learning with Tangible Technologies , 2008 .

[22]  Ann L. Brown Learning and Development: the Problems of Compatibility, Access and Induction. , 1982 .

[23]  R. Siegler,et al.  A microgenetic/cross-sectional study of matrix completion: comparing short-term and long-term change. , 2002, Child development.

[24]  Ali Mazalek,et al.  Teaching table: a tangible mentor for pre-k math education , 2007, TEI.

[25]  Jean-Pierre Thibaut,et al.  The development of analogy making in children: cognitive load and executive functions. , 2010, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[26]  D. Kuhn Microgenetic Study of Change: What Has It Told Us? , 1995 .

[27]  H. Simon,et al.  Empirical tests of a theory of human acquisition of concepts for sequential patterns , 1973 .

[28]  D. Detterman The case for the prosecution: Transfer as an epiphenomenon. , 1996 .

[29]  Linda Jarvin,et al.  Making Instruction and Assessment Responsive to Diverse Students’ Progress: Group-Administered Dynamic Assessment in Teaching Mathematics , 2011, Journal of learning disabilities.

[30]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implica-tions , 1999 .

[31]  Robert J. Sternberg,et al.  Dynamic Testing: The Nature and Measurement of Learning Potential , 2001 .

[32]  Zhe Chen,et al.  Positive and negative transfer in analogical problem solving by 6-year-old children , 1989 .

[33]  Nira Granott,et al.  Scaffolding dynamically toward change: Previous and new perspectives , 2005 .

[34]  J. Bruner,et al.  The role of tutoring in problem solving. , 1976, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[35]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Unities in inductive reasoning , 1983 .

[36]  U. Goswami,et al.  Analogical reasoning and cognitive development. , 1996, Advances in child development and behavior.

[37]  Erika Tunteler,et al.  The Effects of Self- and Other-Scaffolding on Progression and Variation in Children’s Geometric Analogy Performance: A Microgenetic Research , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology.

[38]  R. Siegler,et al.  What leads children to adopt new strategies? A microgenetic/cross-sectional study of class inclusion. , 2006, Child development.

[39]  Microdevelopment: A multi-component system that constructs knowledge: Insights from microgenetic study , 2002 .

[40]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Children's development of analogical reasoning: insights from scene analogy problems. , 2006, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[41]  Albrecht Schmidt,et al.  A cube to learn: a tangible user interface for the design of a learning appliance , 2005, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[42]  Willem Fontijn,et al.  On the correlation between children's performances on electronic board tasks and nonverbal intelligence test measures , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[43]  Erik De Corte Transfer as the Productive Use of Acquired Knowledge, Skills, and Motivations: , 2003 .

[44]  Clarissa A. Thompson,et al.  The trouble with transfer: insights from microgenetic changes in the representation of numerical magnitude. , 2008, Child development.

[45]  Robert S Siegler,et al.  Cognitive variability. , 2007, Developmental science.

[46]  D. Bjorklund,et al.  Children’s use of multiple and variable addition strategies in a game context , 2001 .

[47]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Dynamic Assessment as Responsiveness to Intervention; a Scripted Protocol to Identify Young At-Risk Readers , 2007 .

[48]  Ann L. Brown Knowing When, Where, and How to Remember: A Problem of Metacognition. Technical Report No. 47. , 1977 .

[49]  C. S. White,et al.  Development of analogical reasoning in 4- and 5-year-old children , 1989 .

[50]  J. Campione,et al.  Children's learning and transfer of inductive reasoning rules: studies of proximal development. , 1986, Child development.

[51]  R. Siegler Microgenetic Analyses of Learning , 2007 .

[52]  R. Siegler Emerging Minds: The Process of Change in Children's Thinking , 1996 .

[53]  Danae Stanton Fraser,et al.  Literature Review in Learning with Tangible Technologies , 2004 .

[54]  J. Elliott,et al.  Dynamic testing with tangible electronics: measuring children's change in strategy use with a series completion task. , 2011, The British journal of educational psychology.