The Anatomy of Smartness of Smart Sustainable Cities: An Inclusive Approach

Being “smart” has become a challenge of increasing importance to many cities and communities. To the best of our knowledge, limited are the studies that advise on the actions to be undertaken to enhance the smartness of a city. Many cities around the World are claiming to be smart and sustainable, recommending such actions would be a promising area of research. There exists no unique definition for smartness so far. It means different things to different groups of people. In this research paper, we attempt to bridge this gap in knowledge and explore the concept of smartness of Smart Sustainable Cities by identifying its attributes through an inclusive approach. The latter captures the solutions to be implemented for a city to be smart and sustainable, referred to, in this research, as objective attributes, and the role of citizens in achieving smartness of cities, referred to as subjective attributes. Capturing the objective and subjective components of smartness leads to a holistic assessment of the performance of SSCs. This paper contributes to knowledge and practice as it constitutes the grounds for the introduction of an SSC assessment model ensuring the integral sustainability of the systems of the city, including the human system.

[1]  Anthony Townsend,et al.  Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia , 2013 .

[2]  Jamie Peck Struggling with the Creative Class , 2005 .

[3]  P. Nijkamp,et al.  Smart Cities in Europe , 2011 .

[4]  A. El-Zaart,et al.  A Conceptual Multidimensional Model for Assessing Smart Sustainable Cities , 2016 .

[5]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Conceptualizing smart city with dimensions of technology, people, and institutions , 2011, dg.o '11.

[6]  Carole Rakodi,et al.  Sustainable urbanisation : achieving Agenda 21 , 2002 .

[7]  Anna Corinna Cagliano,et al.  Current trends in Smart City initiatives: some stylised facts , 2014 .

[8]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Would You Be Happier If You Were Richer? A Focusing Illusion , 2006, Science.

[9]  Lorena Batagan,et al.  Smart Cities and Sustainability Models , 2011 .

[10]  Dimitris Ballas,et al.  What makes a ‘happy city’? , 2013 .

[11]  Leonidas G. Anthopoulos,et al.  From Online to Ubiquitous Cities: The Technical Transformation of Virtual Communities , 2009, e-Democracy.

[12]  William E. Rees,et al.  Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out , 1992 .

[13]  William E. Rees,et al.  Ecological Footprints and Appropriated Carrying Capacity: What Urban Economics Leaves Out , 2017, The Earthscan Reader in Rural–Urban Linkages.

[14]  A. Sheedy,et al.  Handbook on Citizen Engagement: Beyond Consultation , 2008 .

[15]  Mahbub ul Haq,et al.  Reflections on human development , 1995 .

[16]  Nicos Komninos,et al.  Intelligent Cities: Innovation, Knowledge Systems and Digital Spaces , 2002 .

[17]  Helena Lindskog,et al.  Smart Communities Initiatives , 2005 .

[18]  Leif Edvinsson,et al.  Aspects on the city as a knowledge tool , 2006, J. Knowl. Manag..

[19]  C. Rogers,et al.  Smart Cities: Contradicting Definitions and Unclear Measures , 2014 .

[20]  Mark Deakin,et al.  From intelligent to smart cities , 2011 .

[21]  Carl Adams,et al.  Assessing smartness of smart sustainable cities: A comparative analysis , 2017, 2017 Sensors Networks Smart and Emerging Technologies (SENSET).

[22]  Tamara Kulesa A Vision of Smarter Cities : How Cities Can Lead the Way into a Prosperous and Sustainable Future Moderator : , 2009 .

[23]  Toru Ishida,et al.  Digital city Kyoto , 2002, CACM.

[24]  E. Diener,et al.  Culture and well-being , 2009 .

[25]  J. Drexhage,et al.  Sustainable development: from Brundtland to Rio 2012. Background paper prepared for consideration by the High Level Panel on Global Sustainability at its first meeting 19 September 2010. , 2010 .

[26]  R. Hollands Will the real smart city please stand up? , 2008, The Routledge Companion to Smart Cities.