Shared Control : Balancing Autonomy and Human Assistance with a Group of Quadrotor UAVs

Robustness and flexibility constitute the main advantages of multiple-robot systems with respect to single-robot ones as per the recent literature. The use of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) combines these benefits with the agility and pervasiveness of aerial platforms [1], [2]. The degree of autonomy of the multi-UAV system should be tuned according to the specificities of the situation under consideration. For regular missions, fully autonomous UAV systems are often appropriate, but, in general, the use of semiautonomous groups of UAVs, supervised or partially controlled by one or more human operators, is the only viable solution to deal with the complexity and unpredictability of real-world scenarios as in, e.g., the case of search and rescue missions or exploration of large/cluttered environments [3]. In addition, the human presence is also mandatory for taking the responsibility of critical decisions in high-risk situations [4].

[1]  Dongjun Lee,et al.  Passive-Set-Position-Modulation Framework for Interactive Robotic Systems , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[2]  Jonathan P. How,et al.  The MIT Indoor Multi-Vehicle Flight Testbed , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[3]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  The GRASP Multiple Micro-UAV Testbed , 2010, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[4]  A. Benallegue,et al.  Exact linearization and noninteracting control of a 4 rotors helicopter via dynamic feedback , 2001, Proceedings 10th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. ROMAN 2001 (Cat. No.01TH8591).

[5]  Antonio Franchi,et al.  Bilateral Teleoperation of Groups of Mobile Robots With Time-Varying Topology , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[6]  Stefano Stramigioli,et al.  Bilateral Telemanipulation With Time Delays: A Two-Layer Approach Combining Passivity and Transparency , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[7]  Mark W. Spong,et al.  Bilateral teleoperation: An historical survey , 2006, Autom..

[8]  M. Fliess,et al.  Flatness and defect of non-linear systems: introductory theory and examples , 1995 .

[9]  J. Venrooij The human body in motion: Research at the Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics , 2014 .

[10]  Magnus Egerstedt,et al.  Executive decision support , 2009, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[11]  Antonio Franchi,et al.  A passivity-based decentralized approach for the bilateral teleoperation of a group of UAVs with switching topology , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[12]  Jonathan P. How,et al.  UAV Task Assignment , 2008, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[13]  Antonio Franchi,et al.  Bilateral teleoperation of multiple UAVs with decentralized bearing-only formation control , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[14]  Antonio Franchi,et al.  Haptic teleoperation of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles over the internet , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[15]  Magnus Egerstedt,et al.  Executive Decision Support: Single-Agent Control of Multiple UAVs , 2009 .

[16]  Peter I. Corke,et al.  A novel approach to haptic tele-operation of aerial robot vehicles , 2010, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[17]  Robin R. Murphy,et al.  Mobile robots in mine rescue and recovery , 2009, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[18]  René van Paassen,et al.  Artificial Force Field for Haptic Feedback in UAV Teleoperation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[19]  Sergei Lupashin,et al.  The Flying Machine Arena as of 2010 , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[20]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  Planning and control for cooperative manipulation and transportation with aerial robots , 2011, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[21]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  Time scales and stability in networked multi-robot systems , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[22]  Mac Schwager,et al.  Eyes in the Sky: Decentralized Control for the Deployment of Robotic Camera Networks , 2011, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[23]  Antonio Franchi,et al.  An evaluation of haptic cues on the tele-operator's perceptual awareness of multiple UAVs' environments , 2011, 2011 IEEE World Haptics Conference.

[24]  Antonio Franchi,et al.  Measuring an operator's maneuverability performance in the haptic teleoperation of multiple robots , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[25]  Antonio Franchi,et al.  Experiments of passivity-based bilateral aerial teleoperation of a group of UAVs with decentralized velocity synchronization , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[26]  Antonio Franchi,et al.  Bilateral teleoperation of a group of UAVs with communication delays and switching topology , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.