Searching for Signs of Intelligent Life: An Investigation of Young Children's Beliefs About Robot Intelligence

Children's worlds are increasingly populated by intelligent technologies. This has raised a number of questions about the ways in which technology can change children's ideas about important concepts, like what it means to be alive or smart. In this study, we examined the impact of experience with intelligent technologies on children's ideas about robot intelligence. A total of 60 children aged 4 through 7 were asked to identify the intellectual, psychological, and biological characteristics of 8 entities that differed in terms of their life status and intellectual capabilities. Results indicated that as children gained experience in this domain, they began to differentiate robots from other familiar entities. This differentiation was indicated by a unique pattern of responses about the intellectual and psychological characteristics of robots. These findings suggest that experience may yield a more highly developed viewpoint that reflects an appreciation of the distinctions between biological life, machines, and artificially intelligent technologies. People who grew up in the world of the mechanical are more comfortable with a definition of what is alive that excludes all but the biological and resist shifting definitions of aliveness.… Children who have grown up with computational objects don't experience that dichotomy. They turn the dichotomy into a menu and cycle through its choices. (Turkle, 1999, p. 552)

[1]  I. Sigel,et al.  HANDBOOK OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY , 2006 .

[2]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[3]  M. Chi Knowledge structures and memory development. , 1978 .

[4]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[5]  R. Sternberg,et al.  People's conceptions of intelligence. , 1981 .

[6]  C N Johnson,et al.  Children's developing conceptions of the mind and brain. , 1982, Child development.

[7]  M. Chi,et al.  Network representation of a child's dinosaur knowledge. , 1983 .

[8]  J. Stigler “Mental abacus”: The effect of abacus training on Chinese children's mental calculation , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  James F. Voss,et al.  Star Wars: A developmental study of expert and novice knowledge structures , 1985 .

[10]  S. Yussen The growth of reflection in children , 1985 .

[11]  Suzanne K. Damarin,et al.  The second self: Computers and the human spirit , 1985 .

[12]  R. Siegler,et al.  Children's understandings of the attributes of life. , 1986, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[13]  Giyoo Hatano,et al.  Young Children's Spontaneous Personification as Analogy. , 1987 .

[14]  Susan A. Gelman Children’s Expectations Concerning Natural Kind Categories , 1988 .

[15]  R. Gelman,et al.  Preschooler's Ability to Decide Whether a Photographed Unfamiliar Object Can Move Itself. , 1988 .

[16]  Susan A. Gelman,et al.  Children's use of categories to guide biological inferences , 1989 .

[17]  R. Siegler,et al.  Mechanisms of cognitive development. , 1989, Annual review of psychology.

[18]  Kathy E. Johnson,et al.  Microgenetic analysis of first steps in children's acquisition of expertise on shorebirds. , 1994 .

[19]  Michelene T. H. Chi,et al.  How Inferences about Novel Domain-Related Concepts Can Be Constrained by Structured Knowledge. , 1989 .

[20]  J. Searle,et al.  Is the brain's mind a computer program? , 1990, Scientific American.

[21]  Kayoko Inagaki,et al.  The effects of raising animals on children's biological knowledge , 1990 .

[22]  H. Wellman,et al.  Cognitive development: foundational theories of core domains. , 1992, Annual review of psychology.

[23]  S. Gelman,et al.  Preschoolers' Ability to Distinguish Living Kinds as a Function of Regrowth , 1993 .

[24]  R. Siegler,et al.  The development of biological knowledge: A multi-national study , 1993 .

[25]  Patricia M. Greenfield,et al.  Effect of video game practice on spatial skills in girls and boys , 1994 .

[26]  Mike van Duuren,et al.  Do computers have brains ? What children believe about intelligent artifacts , 1995 .

[27]  S. Gelman,et al.  Children's causal explanations of animate and inanimate motion , 1996 .

[28]  M. Scaife,et al.  “Because a robot's brain hasn't got a brain, it just controls itself” — Children's attributions of brain related behaviour to intelligent artefacts , 1996 .

[29]  van Paul Geert,et al.  Change and development: Issues of theory, method and application , 1997 .

[30]  H. Wellman,et al.  Knowledge acquisition in foundational domains. , 1998 .

[31]  G. Saxe,et al.  Cognition, development, and cultural practices. , 1999, New directions for child and adolescent development.

[32]  Benise S. K Mak,et al.  The role of motion in children's categorization of objects , 1999, Cognition.

[33]  Mark Pesce The Playful World: How Technology Is Transforming Our Imagination , 2000 .

[34]  If robots make choices, are they alive?: Children's judgments of the animacy of intelligent artifacts , 2000 .

[35]  Kevin Crowley,et al.  Objects of Learning , Objects of Talk : Changing Minds in Museums , 2001 .

[36]  S. Gelman,et al.  Children's and adults' models for predicting teleological action: the development of a biology-based model. , 2001, Child development.

[37]  誼余夫 波多野,et al.  Young children's naive thinking about the biological world , 2002 .

[38]  K. Crowley,et al.  Building Islands of Expertise in Everyday Family Activity , 2002 .

[39]  Mary Jo Pugh,et al.  New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development , 2002 .

[40]  B. Rogoff The Cultural Nature of Human Development , 2003 .

[41]  C. Ryan Kinlaw,et al.  The development of children’s beliefs about intelligence , 2003 .

[42]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Robotic pets in the lives of preschool children , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[43]  Sarah N. Woods,et al.  The design space of robots: investigating children's views , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).

[44]  Children's beliefs about what it means to have a mind , 2004 .

[45]  Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver,et al.  Comparing expert and novice understanding of a complex system from the perspective of structures, behaviors, and functions , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[46]  Kathy E. Johnson,et al.  Factors associated with the early emergence of intense interests within conceptual domains , 2004 .

[47]  Beth Kurtz-Costes,et al.  What does it mean to be smart? The development of children's beliefs about intelligence in Germany and the United States , 2005 .

[48]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Exploring young children's attributions through entertainment robots , 2005, ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005..

[49]  湯淺 太一,et al.  20世紀の名著名論:Seymour Papert: Mindstorms:Children Computers and Powerful Ideas Basic Books New York 1980 , 2005 .

[50]  Edith Ackermann,et al.  Playthings that do things: a young kid's "incredibles"! , 2005, IDC '05.

[51]  J. Gee,et al.  Video Games and the Future of Learning , 2005 .

[52]  David D. Preiss,et al.  Intelligence and technology : the impact of tools on the nature and development of human abilities , 2005 .

[53]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Robots as dogs?: children's interactions with the robotic dog AIBO and a live australian shepherd , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[54]  David W. Shaffer,et al.  Epistemic frames for epistemic games , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[55]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  What is a Human? - Toward Psychological Benchmarks in the Field of Human-Robot Interaction , 2006, ROMAN 2006 - The 15th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[56]  Michael Kompf,et al.  We have met technology and it is us , 2005 .

[57]  K. Crowley,et al.  The Personal Exploration Rover: Educational Assessment Of A Robotic Exhibit For Informal Learning Venues* , 2006 .

[58]  S. Gelman,et al.  Robots and rodents: children's inferences about living and nonliving kinds. , 2007, Child development.

[59]  John E. Opfer,et al.  Development of the Animate-Inanimate Distinction , 2010 .