Aligning learning design and learning analytics through instructor involvement: a MOOC case study

ABSTRACT This paper presents the findings of a mixed-methods research that explored the potentials emerging from aligning learning design (LD) and learning analytics (LA) during the design of a predictive analytics solution and from involving the instructors in the design process. The context was a past massive open online course, where the learner data and the instructors were accessible for posterior analysis and additional data collection. Through a close collaboration with the instructors, the details of the prediction task were identified, such as the target variable to predict and the practical constraints to consider. Two predictive models were built: LD-specific model (with features based on the LD and pedagogical intentions), and a generic model (with cumulative features, not informed by the LD). Although the LD-specific predictive model did not outperform the generic one, some LD-driven features were powerful. The quantity and the power of such features were associated with the degree to which the students acted as guided by the LD and pedagogical intentions. The leading instructor’s opinion about the importance of the learning activities in the LD was compared with the results of the feature importance analysis. This comparison helped identify the problems in the LD. The implications for improving the LD are discussed.

[1]  Patrick Jermann,et al.  Identifying Styles and Paths toward Success in MOOCs , 2015, EDM.

[2]  Kalyan Veeramachaneni,et al.  Towards Feature Engineering at Scale for Data from Massive Open Online Courses , 2014, ArXiv.

[3]  María Jesús Rodríguez-Triana,et al.  Semantically Annotated Lesson observation Data in Learning Analytics Datasets: a Reference Model , 2017, IxD&A.

[4]  Jennifer Caroline Greene,et al.  Mixed Methods in Social Inquiry , 2007 .

[5]  Maren Scheffel,et al.  Awareness Is Not Enough: Pitfalls of Learning Analytics Dashboards in the Educational Practice , 2017, EC-TEL.

[6]  Dragan Gasevic,et al.  Effects of instructional conditions and experience on the adoption of a learning tool , 2017, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[7]  Nancy L. Leech,et al.  A typology of mixed methods research designs , 2009 .

[8]  Andreas Harrer,et al.  Integrated representations and small data: towards contextualized and embedded analytics tools for learners , 2015, LAK.

[9]  Mohamed Bekkar,et al.  Evaluation Measures for Models Assessment over Imbalanced Data Sets , 2013 .

[10]  Eduardo Gómez-Sánchez,et al.  Predicting the decrease of engagement indicators in a MOOC , 2017, LAK.

[11]  María Jesús Rodríguez-Triana,et al.  The teacher in the loop: customizing multimodal learning analytics for blended learning , 2018, LAK.

[12]  Kalyan Veeramachaneni,et al.  Likely to stop? Predicting Stopout in Massive Open Online Courses , 2014, ArXiv.

[13]  Grant T. Harris,et al.  Comparing Effect Sizes in Follow-Up Studies: ROC Area, Cohen's d, and r , 2005, Law and human behavior.

[14]  Yannis A. Dimitriadis,et al.  Predicting Student Participation in Peer Reviews in MOOCs , 2017, EMOOCs-WIP.

[15]  Manolis Mavrikis,et al.  Reflective Analytics for Interactive e-books , 2017, IxD&A.

[16]  Christopher Brooks,et al.  Predictive Modelling in Teaching and Learning , 2017 .

[17]  Jacob Whitehill,et al.  MOOC Dropout Prediction: How to Measure Accuracy? , 2017, L@S.

[18]  Bart Rienties,et al.  Mixing and Matching Learning Design and Learning Analytics , 2017, HCI.

[19]  Kalyan Veeramachaneni,et al.  Robust Predictive Models on MOOCs : Transferring Knowledge across Courses , 2016, EDM.

[20]  Shane Dawson,et al.  Informing Pedagogical Action , 2013 .

[21]  N. Meinshausen,et al.  Stability selection , 2008, 0809.2932.

[22]  Gretchen B. Rossman,et al.  Designing qualitative research, 3rd ed. , 1999 .

[23]  Linda Corrin,et al.  A conceptual framework linking learning design with learning analytics , 2016, LAK.

[24]  Josh Gardner,et al.  Student success prediction in MOOCs , 2017, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[25]  María Jesús Rodríguez-Triana,et al.  Scripting and monitoring meet each other: Aligning learning analytics and learning design to support teachers in orchestrating CSCL situations , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[26]  K. Robert Lai,et al.  Who will pass? Analyzing learner behaviors in MOOCs , 2016, Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanc. Learn..

[27]  Muhammad Razuan Abdul Razak,et al.  PART III: CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK , 2015 .

[28]  Michail N. Giannakos,et al.  Learning Analytics for Learning Design: Towards Evidence-Driven Decisions to Enhance Learning , 2017, EC-TEL.

[29]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[30]  Chris Piech,et al.  Deconstructing disengagement: analyzing learner subpopulations in massive open online courses , 2013, LAK '13.

[31]  Dragan Gasevic,et al.  Learning analytics should not promote one size fits all: The effects of instructional conditions in predicting academic success , 2016, Internet High. Educ..

[32]  David R. Thomas,et al.  A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data , 2006 .

[33]  Kenneth R. Koedinger,et al.  Going Beyond Better Data Prediction to Create Explanatory Models of Educational Data , 2017 .

[34]  Eduardo Gómez-Sánchez,et al.  An Approach to Build in situ Models for the Prediction of the Decrease of Academic Engagement Indicators in Massive Open Online Courses , 2018, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[35]  Barbara Wasson,et al.  Editorial: Learning design, teacher inquiry into student learning and learning analytics: A call for action , 2015, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[36]  Hendrik Drachsler,et al.  Opportunities and Challenges in Using Learning Analytics in Learning Design , 2017, EC-TEL.

[37]  Carlos Delgado Kloos,et al.  Prediction in MOOCs: A Review and Future Research Directions , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[38]  Alyssa Friend Wise,et al.  Learning analytics implementation design , 2017 .

[39]  Mina Shirvani Boroujeni,et al.  Discovery and temporal analysis of latent study patterns in MOOC interaction sequences , 2018, LAK.

[40]  Alejandra Martínez-Monés,et al.  The teacher in the loop: customizing MMLA in blended CSCL scenarios , 2017 .

[41]  Gaël Varoquaux,et al.  Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python , 2011, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[42]  Siu-Cheung Kong Guest reviewers: volume 10 , 2016, Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanc. Learn..

[43]  Jacob Whitehill,et al.  Delving Deeper into MOOC Student Dropout Prediction , 2017, ArXiv.

[44]  Demetrios G. Sampson,et al.  Teaching and Learning Analytics to Support Teacher Inquiry: A Systematic Literature Review , 2017 .

[45]  Tso-Jung Yen,et al.  Discussion on "Stability Selection" by Meinshausen and Buhlmann , 2010 .

[46]  Sherif A. Halawa,et al.  Dropout Prediction in MOOCs using Learner Activity Features , 2014 .

[47]  Mar Pérez-Sanagustín,et al.  Self-regulated learning strategies predict learner behavior and goal attainment in Massive Open Online Courses , 2017, Comput. Educ..