Probabilistic Assessment of Vessel Collision Risk: An Evidential Reasoning and Artificial Potential Field-Based Method

This chapter proposes a novel method to estimate the collision probabilities of monitoring targets for coastal radar surveillance. Initially, the probability of a monitoring target being a real moving vessel is estimated using the records of manual operations and the Evidential Reasoning (ER) rule. Subsequently, the bridges, piers and other encountering vessels in a waterway are characterized as collision potential fields using an Artificial Potential Field (APF) model, and the corresponding coefficients can be trained in terms of the historical vessel distributions. As a result, the positional collision potential of any monitoring vessel can be obtained through overlapping all the collision potential fields together. The probabilities of authenticity and the collision potential are further formulated as two pieces of evidence on which the Dempster’s rule of combination is used to reason the collision probability of a monitoring target. The vessels associated with high collision probabilities can be highlighted for supervisors’ attention, as they potentially pose high risks to safety. A preliminary field test was conducted to validate the proposed method.

[1]  Jin Wang,et al.  Incorporation of formal safety assessment and Bayesian network in navigational risk estimation of the Yangtze River , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[2]  Li Hongbo,et al.  Estimation of detection threshold in multiple ship target situations with HF ground wave radar , 2007 .

[3]  Maria Hänninen,et al.  Influences of variables on ship collision probability in a Bayesian belief network model , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[4]  P. Terndrup Pedersen Review and application of ship collision and grounding analysis procedures , 2010 .

[5]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  Probability modelling of vessel collisions , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  Dan M. Frangopol,et al.  Probabilistic ship collision risk and sustainability assessment considering risk attitudes , 2015 .

[7]  Peter Willett,et al.  Radar/AIS data fusion and SAR tasking for Maritime Surveillance , 2008, 2008 11th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[8]  Jiangping Wang The current status and future aspects in formal ship safety assessment , 2001 .

[9]  A. G. Eleye-Datubo,et al.  Marine and Offshore Safety Assessment by Incorporative Risk Modeling in a Fuzzy‐Bayesian Network of an Induced Mass Assignment Paradigm , 2008, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[10]  Pradeep K. Khosla,et al.  Real-time obstacle avoidance using harmonic potential functions , 1991, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[11]  Yahei Fujii,et al.  II—The Probability of Stranding , 1974 .

[12]  Klaus D. McDonald-Maier,et al.  Autonomous Ship Collision Avoidance Navigation Concepts, Technologies and Techniques , 2007, Journal of Navigation.

[13]  Bo Li,et al.  An approach of vessel collision risk assessment based on the D–S evidence theory , 2013 .

[14]  Li Suyi,et al.  Ship collision risk assessment for the Singapore Strait. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[15]  Ting Chen,et al.  An Obstacle Avoidance Method of Soccer Robot Based on Evolutionary Artificial Potential Field , 2012 .

[16]  Min Cheol Lee,et al.  Obstacle avoidance for mobile robots using artificial potential field approach with simulated annealing , 2001, ISIE 2001. 2001 IEEE International Symposium on Industrial Electronics Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8570).

[17]  Pradeep K. Khosla,et al.  Manipulator control with superquadric artificial potential functions: theory and experiments , 1990, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[18]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  Determination of collision criteria and causation factors appropriate to a model for estimating the probability of maritime accidents , 2012 .

[19]  Maria Hänninen,et al.  Analysis of the marine traffic safety in the Gulf of Finland , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[20]  Roberto Sepúlveda,et al.  Path planning for mobile robots using Bacterial Potential Field for avoiding static and dynamic obstacles , 2015, Expert Syst. Appl..

[21]  Wanlin Yang,et al.  Radar target recognition based on fuzzy optimal transformation using high-resolution range profile , 2013, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[22]  J. Norris,et al.  Probabilities and Potential, C: Potential Theory for Discrete and Continuous Semigroups , 2011 .

[23]  Jin Wang,et al.  A novel approach of collision assessment for coastal radar surveillance , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[24]  Xinping Yan,et al.  A novel marine radar targets extraction approach based on sequential images and Bayesian Network , 2016 .

[25]  Frédéric Plumet,et al.  A potential field approach for reactive navigation of autonomous sailboats , 2012, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[26]  Xinping Yan,et al.  Classification of Automatic Radar Plotting Aid targets based on improved Fuzzy C-Means , 2015 .

[27]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  Real-Time Obstacle Avoidance for Manipulators and Mobile Robots , 1986 .

[28]  Guo-Ping Liu,et al.  Multiobjective Optimisation And Control , 2008 .