Religious motivations for cooperation: an experimental investigation using explicit primes

The role of religion in human cooperation remains a highly contested topic. Recent studies using economic game experiments to explore this issue have been largely inconclusive, yielding a range of conflicting results. In this study, we investigate the ability of religion to promote cooperation by using explicit theological primes. In the first study, conducted in a church, we find that subjects who report a stronger connection with a Christian passage about charitable giving are subsequently more likely to cooperate in a one-shot prisoner’s dilemma game. In the second study, conducted over the Internet, we find that Christian subjects are more likely to cooperate after reading a Christian passage than a neutral one. However, in the same study, we find that Hindu and secular passages have no significant effect on Christians, and that none of the passages (Christian, Hindu, or secular) have an effect on non-Christians. Our results show the potential power of explicitly religious exhortations that promote cooperation, and also their selectivity.

[1]  F. Costin The Scrambled Sentence Test: a Group Measure of Hostility , 1969 .

[2]  H. Tajfel,et al.  Social categorization and intergroup behaviour , 1971 .

[3]  M. Brewer In-group bias in the minimal intergroup situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. , 1979 .

[4]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The evolution of cooperation. , 1984, Science.

[5]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[6]  N. Smart The World's Religions , 1989 .

[7]  R. Hinde,et al.  Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action Collective Action , 2010 .

[8]  M. Banaji,et al.  Implicit social cognition: attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. , 1995, Psychological review.

[9]  S. Sloman The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. , 1996 .

[10]  Jonathan Baron,et al.  Social roles and the moral judgement of acts and omissions , 1996 .

[11]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Iris Bohnet,et al.  The sound of silence in prisoner's dilemma and dictator games , 1999 .

[13]  M. Milinski,et al.  Cooperation through image scoring in humans. , 2000, Science.

[14]  R. Petty,et al.  The effects of stereotype activation on behavior: a review of possible mechanisms. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  R. Riolo,et al.  Evolution of cooperation without reciprocity , 2001, Nature.

[16]  M. Milinski,et al.  Reputation helps solve the ‘tragedy of the commons’ , 2002, Nature.

[17]  D. Wilson Darwin's Cathedral: Evolution, Religion, and the Nature of Society , 2002 .

[18]  Richard Sosis,et al.  Signaling, solidarity, and the sacred: The evolution of religious behavior , 2003 .

[19]  D. Kahneman A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[20]  Bradley J. Ruffle,et al.  Religious Ritual and Cooperation: Testing for a Relationship on Israeli Religious and Secular Kibbutzim1 , 2003, Current Anthropology.

[21]  Arie W Kruglanski,et al.  Leading us not unto temptation: momentary allurements elicit overriding goal activation. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  Scott Atran,et al.  Religion's evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[23]  J. L. Wenger RESEARCH: The Automatic Activation of Religious Concepts: Implications for Religious Orientations , 2004 .

[24]  Henk Aarts,et al.  The power of the subliminal: On subliminal persuasion and other potential applications , 2005 .

[25]  Dominic D. P. Johnson God’s punishment and public goods , 2005, Human nature.

[26]  Dominic D. P. Johnson,et al.  "O Lord… You Perceive my Thoughts from Afar": Recursiveness and the Evolution of Supernatural Agency , 2005 .

[27]  S. Frederick Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 4—Fall 2005—Pages 25–42 Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making , 2022 .

[28]  M. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of indirect reciprocity , 2005, Nature.

[29]  J. Blascovich,et al.  The Nonconscious Influence of Religious Symbols in Motivated Performance Situations , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[30]  Ernst Fehr,et al.  Parochial altruism in humans , 2006, Nature.

[31]  Bettina Rockenbach,et al.  The efficient interaction of indirect reciprocity and costly punishment , 2006, Nature.

[32]  Simon A. Levin,et al.  Learning to live in a global commons: socioeconomic challenges for a sustainable environment , 2006, Ecological Research.

[33]  M. Nowak Five Rules for the Evolution of Cooperation , 2006, Science.

[34]  Naoki Masuda,et al.  Tag-based indirect reciprocity by incomplete social information , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  R. Sosis Religious Behaviors, Badges, and Bans: Signaling Theory and the Evolution of Religion. , 2006 .

[36]  Samuel Bowles,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 and S2 Table S1 References and Notes the Coevolution of Parochial Altruism and War , 2022 .

[37]  A. Shariff,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article God Is Watching You Priming God Concepts Increases Prosocial Behavior in an Anonymous Economic Game , 2022 .

[38]  Paul Kevenhörster,et al.  Elinor Ostrom, Governing the Commons. The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge 1990 , 2007 .

[39]  Cindy D. Kam,et al.  Beyond the Self: Social Identity, Altruism, and Political Participation , 2007, The Journal of Politics.

[40]  H. Ohtsuki,et al.  Evolutionary game dynamics in phenotype space , 2008, 0806.2636.

[41]  David G. Rand,et al.  Winners don’t punish , 2008, Nature.

[42]  Joseph A. Bulbulia,et al.  Religious Solidarity: The Hand Grenade Experiment , 2008 .

[43]  E. Fehr,et al.  The Coevolution of Cultural Groups and Ingroup Favoritism , 2008, Science.

[44]  A. Shariff,et al.  The Origin and Evolution of Religious Prosociality , 2008, Science.

[45]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of cooperation by phenotypic similarity , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Arthur Schram,et al.  Indirect Punishment and Generosity Toward Strangers , 2009, Science.

[47]  O. Corneille,et al.  “Speak, Lord, Your Servant Is Listening”: Religious Priming Activates Submissive Thoughts and Behaviors , 2009 .

[48]  David G. Rand,et al.  Dynamic remodeling of in-group bias during the 2008 presidential election , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  David G. Rand,et al.  Positive Interactions Promote Public Cooperation , 2009, Science.

[50]  J. Henrich,et al.  Markets, Religion, Community Size, and the Evolution of Fairness and Punishment , 2010, Science.

[51]  Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis Analyzing the Amazon Mechanical Turk marketplace , 2010, XRDS.

[52]  David G. Rand,et al.  The online laboratory: conducting experiments in a real labor market , 2010, ArXiv.

[53]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  “Do Unto Others”: Effects of Priming the Golden Rule on Buddhists’ and Christians’ Attitudes Toward Gay People , 2010 .

[54]  Judith M Burkart,et al.  On the psychology of cooperation in humans and other primates: combining the natural history and experimental evidence of prosociality , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[55]  Panagiotis G. Ipeirotis,et al.  Running Experiments on Amazon Mechanical Turk , 2010, Judgment and Decision Making.

[56]  David G. Rand,et al.  Slow to Anger and Fast to Forgive: Cooperation in an Uncertain World , 2010 .

[57]  K. Sigmund The Calculus of Selfishness , 2010 .

[58]  M. Inzlicht,et al.  Reflecting on God , 2010, Psychological science.

[59]  Nicholas A. Christakis,et al.  Cooperative behavior cascades in human social networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[60]  Shame and Religious Prosociality , 2010 .

[61]  E. Fehr,et al.  Wrath of God: religious primes and punishment , 2011, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[62]  Bradley J. Ruffle,et al.  Do Religious Contexts Elicit More Trust and Altruism? An Experiment on Facebook , 2010 .

[63]  M. Hauser,et al.  Mayan morality: An exploration of permissible harms , 2010, Cognition.

[64]  J. Henrich,et al.  The Evolution of Religion: How Cognitive By-Products, Adaptive Learning Heuristics, Ritual Displays, and Group Competition Generate Deep Commitments to Prosocial Religions , 2010 .

[65]  David G. Rand,et al.  Dynamic social networks promote cooperation in experiments with humans , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[66]  Jeroen C.J.M. van den Bergh,et al.  Evolution of parochial altruism by multilevel selection , 2011 .

[67]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Cooperation and Contagion in Web-Based, Networked Public Goods Experiments , 2010, SECO.

[68]  D. Kahneman Thinking, Fast and Slow , 2011 .

[69]  Ali Ahmed,et al.  Implicit influences of Christian religious representations on dictator and prisoner's dilemma game decisions , 2011 .

[70]  Michael D. Buhrmester,et al.  Amazon's Mechanical Turk , 2011, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[71]  David G. Rand,et al.  The evolution of antisocial punishment in optional public goods games. , 2011, Nature communications.

[72]  P. Martinsson,et al.  The effect of religiosity and religious festivals on positional concerns – an experimental investigation of Ramadan , 2011 .

[73]  Will M. Gervais,et al.  Analytic Thinking Promotes Religious Disbelief , 2012, Science.

[74]  David G. Rand,et al.  The promise of Mechanical Turk: how online labor markets can help theorists run behavioral experiments. , 2012, Journal of theoretical biology.

[75]  David G. Rand,et al.  Economic Games on the Internet: The Effect of $1 Stakes , 2011, PloS one.

[76]  David G. Rand,et al.  Divine intuition: cognitive style influences belief in God. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[77]  Martin A. Nowak,et al.  Evolution of in-group favoritism , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[78]  N. Raihani,et al.  A positive effect of flowers rather than eye images in a large-scale, cross-cultural dictator game , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[79]  David G. Rand,et al.  Spontaneous giving and calculated greed , 2012, Nature.

[80]  Siddharth Suri,et al.  Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[81]  Lisa R. Goldberg,et al.  Thinking, Fast and Slow, by D. Kahneman , 2013 .

[82]  R. Hoffmann The Experimental Economics of Religion , 2011, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[83]  D. Xygalatas Effects of religious setting on cooperative behavior: a case study from Mauritius , 2013 .