A modular approach to adaptive structures.

A remarkable property of nastic, shape changing plants is their complete fusion between actuators and structure. This is achieved by combining a large number of cells whose geometry, internal pressures and material properties are optimized for a given set of target shapes and stiffness requirements. An advantage of such a fusion is that cell walls are prestressed by cell pressures which increases, decreases the overall structural stiffness, weight. Inspired by the nastic movement of plants, Pagitz et al (2012 Bioinspir. Biomim. 7) published a novel concept for pressure actuated cellular structures. This article extends previous work by introducing a modular approach to adaptive structures. An algorithm that breaks down any continuous target shapes into a small number of standardized modules is presented. Furthermore it is shown how cytoskeletons within each cell enhance the properties of adaptive modules. An adaptive passenger seat and an aircrafts leading, trailing edge is used to demonstrate the potential of a modular approach.

[1]  U Weierstall,et al.  X-ray lasers for structural and dynamic biology , 2012, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[2]  K. W. Wang,et al.  Fibrillar Network Adaptive Structure with Ion-transport Actuation , 2006 .

[3]  Achille Messac,et al.  Study of a Honeycomb-Type Rigidified Inflatable Structure for Housing , 2004 .

[4]  D. Ingber,et al.  Cellular tensegrity : defining new rules of biological design that govern the cytoskeleton , 2022 .

[5]  J. Onuchic,et al.  Biomolecular dynamics: order–disorder transitions and energy landscapes , 2012, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[6]  Oliver Brock,et al.  A compliant hand based on a novel pneumatic actuator , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[7]  Filip Ilievski,et al.  Multigait soft robot , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  Cagdas D. Onal,et al.  Design and control of a soft and continuously deformable 2D robotic manipulation system , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[9]  M. Pagitz,et al.  Finite element based form-finding algorithm for tensegrity structures , 2009 .

[10]  Srinivas Vasista,et al.  Topology-Optimized Design and Testing of a Pressure-Driven Morphing-Aerofoil Trailing-Edge Structure , 2013 .

[11]  M Pagitz,et al.  Shape-changing shell-like structures , 2013, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[12]  Michael Philen,et al.  Pressurized artificial muscles , 2012 .

[13]  Gregory F Ervin,et al.  Mission Adaptive Compliant Wing – Design , Fabrication and Flight Test , 2009 .

[14]  J. Vigoreaux,et al.  Nature's versatile engine : insect flight muscle inside and out , 2005 .

[15]  C. D. Onal,et al.  A modular approach to soft robots , 2012, 2012 4th IEEE RAS & EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob).

[16]  Markus Pagitz,et al.  Compliant Pressure Actuated Cellular Structures , 2014 .

[17]  Markus Pagitz.  Design of Pressure Actuated Cellular Structures , 2014 .

[18]  Srinivas Vasista,et al.  Realization of Morphing Wings: A Multidisciplinary Challenge , 2012 .

[19]  M Pagitz,et al.  Pressure-actuated cellular structures , 2012, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[20]  Martin Wiedemann,et al.  Design of a Smart Leading Edge Device , 2013 .

[21]  Norman M. Wereley,et al.  Plants and mechanical motion: a synthetic approach to nastic materials and structures , 2012 .

[22]  Ron Barrett,et al.  Mechanics of Pressure-Adaptive Honeycomb , 2011 .