Behavioral assessment of emotional and motivational appraisal during visual processing of emotional scenes depending on spatial frequencies

Previous studies performed on visual processing of emotional stimuli have revealed preference for a specific type of visual spatial frequencies (high spatial frequency, HSF; low spatial frequency, LSF) according to task demands. The majority of studies used a face and focused on the appraisal of the emotional state of others. The present behavioral study investigates the relative role of spatial frequencies on processing emotional natural scenes during two explicit cognitive appraisal tasks, one emotional, based on the self-emotional experience and one motivational, based on the tendency to action. Our results suggest that HSF information was the most relevant to rapidly identify the self-emotional experience (unpleasant, pleasant, and neutral) while LSF was required to rapidly identify the tendency to action (avoidance, approach, and no action). The tendency to action based on LSF analysis showed a priority for unpleasant stimuli whereas the identification of emotional experience based on HSF analysis showed a priority for pleasant stimuli. The present study confirms the interest of considering both emotional and motivational characteristics of visual stimuli.

[1]  Patrik Vuilleumier,et al.  Cognitive science: Staring fear in the face , 2005, Nature.

[2]  N. Frijda.  Emotion, cognitive structure and action tendency , 1987 .

[3]  M. Eimer,et al.  The role of spatial frequency information for ERP components sensitive to faces and emotional facial expression. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[4]  Martial Mermillod,et al.  Are Coarse Scales Sufficient for Fast Detection of Visual Threat? , 2010, Psychological science.

[5]  E. DeYoe,et al.  Concurrent processing in the primate visual cortex. , 1995 .

[6]  Jeff T. Larsen,et al.  Negative information weighs more heavily on the brain: the negativity bias in evaluative categorizations. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  A. Oliva,et al.  From Blobs to Boundary Edges: Evidence for Time- and Spatial-Scale-Dependent Scene Recognition , 1994 .

[8]  Martial Mermillod,et al.  Neural computation as a tool to differentiate perceptual from emotional processes: The case of anger superiority effect , 2009, Cognition.

[9]  H. Hughes,et al.  Global Precedence, Spatial Frequency Channels, and the Statistics of Natural Images , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  J. Bullier.  Integrated model of visual processing , 2001, Brain Research Reviews.

[11]  MermillodMartial,et al.  Coarse scales are sufficient for efficient categorization of emotional facial expressions , 2010 .

[12]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Brain and cognition , 1989 .

[13]  Christoph M. Michel,et al.  The Neural Substrates and Timing of Top–Down Processes during Coarse-to-Fine Categorization of Visual Scenes: A Combined fMRI and ERP Study , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  R. Zeelenberg,et al.  Emotion-induced trade-offs in spatiotemporal vision. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  A. Ohman,et al.  Emotion drives attention: detecting the snake in the grass. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  J R Lishman,et al.  Temporal Integration of Spatially Filtered Visual Images , 1992, Perception.

[17]  Joseph E LeDoux.  Emotion: clues from the brain. , 1995, Annual review of psychology.

[18]  R. Dolan,et al.  Distinct spatial frequency sensitivities for processing faces and emotional expressions , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  D. Weinberger,et al.  Neocortical modulation of the amygdala response to fearful stimuli , 2003, Biological Psychiatry.

[20]  B. Parkinson,et al.  Emotion and motivation , 1995 .

[21]  A. Wells,et al.  Attention and Emotion: A Clinical Perspective , 1994 .

[22]  J. Hegdé.  Time course of visual perception: Coarse-to-fine processing and beyond , 2008, Progress in Neurobiology.

[23]  M. Bradley,et al.  Emotion and motivation I: defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. , 2001, Emotion.

[24]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Effects of spatial frequency bands on perceptual decision: it is not the stimuli but the comparison. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[25]  E. Harmon-Jones.  Early Career Award. Clarifying the emotive functions of asymmetrical frontal cortical activity. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[26]  R. Zeelenberg,et al.  Emotion Improves and Impairs Early Vision , 2009, Psychological science.

[27]  P. Bex,et al.  Spatial frequency, phase, and the contrast of natural images. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[28]  D. Hubel,et al.  Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. , 1988, Science.

[29]  E. Harmon-Jones,et al.  The Effect of Personal Relevance and Approach-Related Action Expectation on Relative Left Frontal Cortical Activity , 2006, Psychological science.

[30]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Activation of the medial prefrontal cortex and extended amygdala by individual ratings of emotional arousal: a fMRI study , 2003, Biological Psychiatry.

[31]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Dissociation of object and spatial processing domains in primate prefrontal cortex. , 1993, Science.

[32]  A. Anderson,et al.  Lesions of the human amygdala impair enhanced perception of emotionally salient events , 2001, Nature.

[33]  Nathalie Guyader,et al.  Image phase or amplitude? Rapid scene categorization is an amplitude-based process. , 2004, Comptes rendus biologies.

[34]  Edward B. Royzman,et al.  Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion , 2001 .

[35]  Arthur P. Ginsburg,et al.  Spatial filtering and visual form perception. , 1986 .

[36]  Sandrine Delord,et al.  Which Mask is the Most Efficient: A Pattern or a Noise? It Depends on the Task , 1998 .

[37]  E. Fox,et al.  Facial Expressions of Emotion: Are Angry Faces Detected More Efficiently? , 2000, Cognition & emotion.

[38]  D. Amaral,et al.  Topographic organization of projections from the amygdala to the visual cortex in the macaque monkey , 2003, Neuroscience.

[39]  P. Lang.  International affective picture system (IAPS) : affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual , 2005 .

[40]  J. Stainer,et al.  The Emotions , 1922, Nature.

[41]  Simon J Graham,et al.  An fMRI study investigating cognitive modulation of brain regions associated with emotional processing of visual stimuli , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[42]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Variations on a human universal: Individual differences in positivity offset and negativity bias , 2005 .

[43]  Markus Junghöfer,et al.  Selective Visual Attention to Emotion , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[44]  A. Oliva,et al.  Coarse Blobs or Fine Edges? Evidence That Information Diagnosticity Changes the Perception of Complex Visual Stimuli , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[45]  P. Montoya,et al.  Low spatial frequency filtering modulates early brain processing of affective complex pictures , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[46]  J. Gross,et al.  The cognitive control of emotion , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[47]  A. Oliva,et al.  Dr. Angry and Mr. Smile: when categorization flexibly modifies the perception of faces in rapid visual presentations , 1999, Cognition.

[48]  F. Martin,et al.  Target processing is facilitated by motivationally relevant cues , 2008, Biological Psychology.

[49]  Dwight J. Kravitz,et al.  A new neural framework for visuospatial processing , 2011, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[50]  M. Bradley,et al.  Activation of the visual cortex in motivated attention. , 2003, Behavioral neuroscience.

[51]  Gaetano Tieri,et al.  Where does an object trigger an action? An investigation about affordances in space , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[52]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A neuromodulatory role for the human amygdala in processing emotional facial expressions. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[53]  M. Bar.  A Cortical Mechanism for Triggering Top-Down Facilitation in Visual Object Recognition , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[54]  Giorgia Committeri,et al.  Ready Both to Your and to My Hands: Mapping the Action Space of Others , 2011, PloS one.

[55]  Sara López-Martín,et al.  An electrophysiological study on the interaction between emotional content and spatial frequency of visual stimuli , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[56]  Dan Foti,et al.  Motivated and controlled attention to emotion: Time-course of the late positive potential , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[57]  Peter J. Lang,et al.  Attention and Orienting : Sensory and Motivational Processes , 1997 .

[58]  Catherine Auxiette,et al.  Contraintes perceptives et temporelles dans l’exploration du modèle de Ledoux , 2011, L’Année psychologique.

[59]  A. Holmes,et al.  The involvement of distinct visual channels in rapid attention towards fearful facial expressions , 2005 .

[60]  Greg Hajcak,et al.  Attending to affect: appraisal strategies modulate the electrocortical response to arousing pictures. , 2006, Emotion.

[61]  Nathalie Guyader,et al.  The coarse-to-fine hypothesis revisited: Evidence from neuro-computational modeling , 2005, Brain and Cognition.

[62]  Martial Mermillod,et al.  Coarse scales are sufficient for efficient categorization of emotional facial expressions: Evidence from neural computation , 2010, Neurocomputing.

[63]  S. Thompson-Schill,et al.  Modulation of Amygdalar Activity by the Conscious Regulation of Negative Emotion , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[64]  M. Bradley,et al.  Motivated attention: Affect, activation, and action. , 1997 .

[65]  C. H. Hansen,et al.  Finding the face in the crowd: an anger superiority effect. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[66]  Vera Ferrari,et al.  Directed and Motivated Attention during Processing of Natural Scenes , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[67]  M. Bar.  Visual objects in context , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.