Establishing correlations of scalp field maps with other experimental variables using covariance analysis and resampling methods

OBJECTIVE In EEG/MEG experiments, increasing the number of sensors improves the spatial resolution of the results. However, the standard statistical methods are inappropriate for these multivariate, highly correlated datasets. We introduce a procedure to identify spatially extended scalp fields that correlate with some external, continuous measure (reaction-time, performance, clinical status) and to test their significance. METHODS We formally deduce that the channel-wise covariance of some experimental variable with scalp field data directly represents intracerebral sources associated with that variable. We furthermore show how the significance of such a representation can be tested with resampling techniques. RESULTS Simulations showed that depending on the number of channels and subjects, effects can be detected already at low signal to noise ratios. In a sample analysis of real data, we found that foreign-language evoked ERP data were significantly associated with foreign-language proficiency. Inverse solutions of the extracted covariances pointed to sources in language-related areas. CONCLUSIONS Covariance mapping combined with bootstrapping methods has high statistical power and yields unique and directly interpretable results. SIGNIFICANCE The introduced methodology overcomes some of the 'traditional' statistical problems in EEG/MEG scalp data analysis. Its application can improve the reproducibility of results in the field of EEG/MEG.

[1]  S. Morand,et al.  Electric source imaging of human brain functions , 2001, Brain Research Reviews.

[2]  Eric Maris,et al.  Randomization tests for ERP topographies and whole spatiotemporal data matrices. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[3]  R. Biscay,et al.  Testing topographic differences between event related brain potentials by using non-parametric combinations of permutation tests. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  N. L. Johnson,et al.  Multivariate Analysis , 1958, Nature.

[5]  Daniel Brandeis,et al.  Brain mapping of bilateral interactions in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and control boys , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[6]  Maria Stein,et al.  The early context effect reflects activity in the temporo-prefrontal semantic system: Evidence from electrical neuroimaging of abstract and concrete word reading , 2008, NeuroImage.

[7]  Maria Stein,et al.  Plasticity in the adult language system: A longitudinal electrophysiological study on second language learning , 2006, NeuroImage.

[8]  Gareth M. James Generalized linear models with functional predictors , 2002 .

[9]  Richard E. Greenblatt,et al.  Randomization-Based Hypothesis Testing from Event-Related Data , 2003, Brain Topography.

[10]  F. Duffy,et al.  Significance probability mapping: an aid in the topographic analysis of brain electrical activity. , 1981, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  A. Fallgatter,et al.  Three-dimensional tomography of event-related potentials during response inhibition: evidence for phasic frontal lobe activation. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[12]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Reference-free identification of components of checkerboard-evoked multichannel potential fields. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  A. McIntosh,et al.  Spatiotemporal analysis of experimental differences in event-related potential data with partial least squares. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[14]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[15]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[16]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Segmentation of brain electrical activity into microstates: model estimation and validation , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[18]  Anthony C. Davison,et al.  Bootstrap Methods and Their Application , 1998 .

[19]  M. Murray,et al.  EEG source imaging , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[20]  J. Thayer,et al.  The continuing problem of false positives in repeated measures ANOVA in psychophysiology: a multivariate solution. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[21]  J. V. Haxby,et al.  Spatial Pattern Analysis of Functional Brain Images Using Partial Least Squares , 1996, NeuroImage.

[22]  R. Leahy,et al.  EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[23]  Alan Gevins,et al.  High resolution evoked potentials of cognition , 2005, Brain Topography.

[24]  C M Michel,et al.  Event-related potential map differences depend on the prestimulus microstates. , 1995, Journal of medical engineering & technology.

[25]  Don M. Tucker,et al.  Localizing Acute Stroke-related EEG Changes:: Assessing the Effects of Spatial Undersampling , 2001, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[26]  R. Blair,et al.  An exact statistical method for comparing topographic maps, with any number of subjects and electrodes , 2005, Brain Topography.

[27]  L. Galán,et al.  Random Field–Union Intersection tests for EEG/MEG imaging , 2004, NeuroImage.

[28]  T. Koenig,et al.  EEG microstate duration and syntax in acute, medication-naïve, first-episode schizophrenia: a multi-center study , 2005, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.