The effect of threshold on the relationship between the receptive-field profile and the spatial-frequency tuning cure in simple cells of the cat's striate cortex

It is believed that spatial summation in most simple cells is a linear process. If this were so, then the Fourier transform of a simple cell's line weighting function should predict the cell's spatial frequency tuning curve. We have compared such predictions with experimental measurements and have found a consistent discrepancy: the predicted tuning curve is much too broad. We show qualitatively that this kind of discrepancy is consistent with the well-known threshold nonlinearity shown by most cortical cells. We have tested quantitatively whether a response threshold could explain the observed disagreements between predictions and measurements: a least-squares minimization routine was used to fit the inverse Fourier Transform of the measured frequency tuning curve to the measured line weighting function. The fitting procedure permitted us to introduce a threshold to the reconstructed line weighting function. The results of the analysis show that, for all of the cells tested, the Fourier transforms produced better predictions when a response threshold was included in the model. For some cells, the actual magnitude of the response threshold was measured independently and found to be compatible with that suggested by the model. The effects of nonlinearities of spatial summation are considered.

[1]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields of single neurones in the cat's striate cortex , 1959, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  D. Hubel,et al.  Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex , 1962, The Journal of physiology.

[3]  G. F. Cooper,et al.  The spatial selectivity of the visual cells of the cat , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Cortical cells ; Bar and edge detectors, or spatial frequency filters , 1978 .

[5]  Earl L. Smith,et al.  Frontiers in Visual Science , 1978 .

[6]  J. Movshon,et al.  Spatial summation in the receptive fields of simple cells in the cat's striate cortex. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[7]  G. Sandini,et al.  Responses of visual cortical cells to periodic and non‐periodic stimuli. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[8]  D. Pollen,et al.  Relationship between spatial frequency selectivity and receptive field profile of simple cells. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  S Marcelja,et al.  Mathematical description of the responses of simple cortical cells. , 1980, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[10]  B. B. Lee,et al.  Phase of responses to sinusoidal gratings of simple cells in cat striate cortex. , 1981, Journal of Neurophysiology.

[11]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  On the variety of spatial frequency selectivities shown by neurons in area 17 of the cat , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[12]  J. Movshon,et al.  The statistical reliability of signals in single neurons in cat and monkey visual cortex , 1983, Vision Research.

[13]  D. Tolhurst,et al.  On the distinctness of simple and complex cells in the visual cortex of the cat. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[14]  J. Movshon,et al.  Length summation in simple cells of cat striate cortex , 1984, Vision Research.

[15]  D. G. Albrecht,et al.  Periodicity of striate-cortex-cell receptive fields. , 1985, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[16]  D. Field,et al.  The structure and symmetry of simple-cell receptive-field profiles in the cat’s visual cortex , 1986, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[17]  J. P. Jones,et al.  An evaluation of the two-dimensional Gabor filter model of simple receptive fields in cat striate cortex. , 1987, Journal of neurophysiology.