Stiffening of soft robotic actuators — Jamming approaches

Soft robotic devices could provide inherent compliance and conformity to external objects. However, the good compliance of soft robots is a direct compromise of its structural rigidity. It is technically challenging to achieve a large degree of inherent compliance while also maintaining reasonable structural stiffness in order to exert forces to perform required tasks. The lack of sufficient structural rigidity results in the limited task efficacy of soft actuators in practical applications. This paper will look into jamming based soft actuator stiffening methods and compare their performance. Suitable application areas of each stiffening method are recommended.

[1]  Cecilia Laschi,et al.  Soft robotics: a bioinspired evolution in robotics. , 2013, Trends in biotechnology.

[2]  Todd A. Gisby,et al.  Multi-functional dielectric elastomer artificial muscles for soft and smart machines , 2012 .

[3]  Karl Iagnemma,et al.  Design and Analysis of a Robust, Low-cost, Highly Articulated manipulator enabled by jamming of granular media , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  Hironari Taniguchi,et al.  Development of new soft actuator using magnetic intelligent fluids for flexible walking robot , 2010, ICCAS 2010.

[5]  Matteo Cianchetti,et al.  Dynamic Model of a Multibending Soft Robot Arm Driven by Cables , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[6]  Stephen A. Morin,et al.  Using explosions to power a soft robot. , 2013, Angewandte Chemie.

[7]  R. Wood,et al.  Tunable elastic stiffness with microconfined magnetorheological domains at low magnetic field , 2010 .

[8]  D. Floreano,et al.  Versatile Soft Grippers with Intrinsic Electroadhesion Based on Multifunctional Polymer Actuators , 2016, Advanced materials.

[9]  Toshiro Noritsugu,et al.  Pneumatic artificial rubber muscle using shape-memory polymer sheet with embedded electrical heating wire , 2014 .

[10]  WeiYing,et al.  A Novel, Variable Stiffness Robotic Gripper Based on Integrated Soft Actuating and Particle Jamming , 2016 .

[11]  Dario Floreano,et al.  Variable stiffness actuator for soft robotics using dielectric elastomer and low-melting-point alloy , 2015, 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).

[12]  Q. Pei,et al.  High-speed electrically actuated elastomers with strain greater than 100% , 2000, Science.

[13]  Robert J. Wood,et al.  Modeling of Soft Fiber-Reinforced Bending Actuators , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[14]  Heinrich M. Jaeger,et al.  A Positive Pressure Universal Gripper Based on the Jamming of Granular Material , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[15]  Karl Iagnemma,et al.  A Novel Layer Jamming Mechanism With Tunable Stiffness Capability for Minimally Invasive Surgery , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[16]  Juan Yi,et al.  Soft robotics for engineers , 2015 .

[17]  Arianna Menciassi,et al.  Design and development of a soft robotic gripper for manipulation in minimally invasive surgery: a proof of concept , 2015 .

[18]  Paolo Dario,et al.  Soft Robot Arm Inspired by the Octopus , 2012, Adv. Robotics.

[19]  Zhibin Yu,et al.  Bistable Large‐Strain Actuation of Interpenetrating Polymer Networks , 2012, Advanced materials.

[20]  Heinrich M. Jaeger,et al.  Universal robotic gripper based on the jamming of granular material , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Oliver Brock,et al.  Selective stiffening of soft actuators based on jamming , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[22]  Filip Ilievski,et al.  Soft robotics for chemists. , 2011, Angewandte Chemie.

[23]  Yang Yang,et al.  Passive Particle Jamming and Its Stiffening of Soft Robotic Grippers , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[24]  Filip Ilievski,et al.  Multigait soft robot , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.