Simulated versus Hardware Laboratories for Control Education: A Critical Appraisal

Abstract The traditional approach to control education in Universities has been to enhance student learning with hardware style experiments. The associated experiments are always constrained by the fact that hardware must be provided. Thus typical experiments use tanks of water, servo motors, inverted pendula etc. These experiments are good in so far as they go. However, quoting a former student, “It is a bit like learning to fly a Jumbo Jet. One has the choice to learn on real hardware (say an ultralight aircraft) or on a simulator of the real aircraft under real flight scenarios”. This paper explores this issue for control education and presents feedback from students comparing traditional hardware experiments with simulated experiments based around real world control system designs.

[1]  Massimiliano de Magistris A MATLAB-based virtual laboratory for teaching introductory quasi-stationary electromagnetics , 2005, IEEE Trans. Educ..

[2]  Mark W. Spong,et al.  Report on the NSF/CSS Workshop on new directions in control engineering education , 1999 .

[3]  L. Pallini,et al.  Computer-aided instruction in wave propagation phenomena , 1998 .

[4]  Dennis S. Bernstein Enhancing undergraduate control education , 1999 .

[5]  K.J. Astrom,et al.  Lund control program combines theory with hands-on experience , 1992, IEEE Control Systems.

[6]  Chris Bissell Control education: time for radical change? , 1999 .

[7]  Ali Feliachi,et al.  Control Systems Curriculum National Survey , 1991, 1991 American Control Conference.

[8]  W. Schaufelberger,et al.  Software and laboratory experiments using computers in control education , 1989, IEEE Control Systems Magazine.

[9]  J.J. Zhu,et al.  Motivation-by challenge for teaching control systems , 1994, IEEE Control Systems.

[10]  William Leithead,et al.  An integrated undergraduate teaching laboratory approach to multivariable control , 1997 .

[11]  K.J. Astrom,et al.  A laptop servo for control education , 2004, IEEE Control Systems.

[12]  P. E. Wellstead,et al.  Teaching control with laboratory scale models , 1990 .

[13]  E. Bristol An industrial point of view on control teaching and theory , 1986, IEEE Control Systems Magazine.

[14]  Ben M. Chen,et al.  A web-based virtual laboratory on a frequency modulation experiment , 2001, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[15]  George Henry Copeman,et al.  The managing director , 1978 .

[16]  D.S. Bernstein,et al.  Innovations in undergraduate education. II , 2005, IEEE Control Systems.

[17]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Future directions in control in an information-rich world , 2003 .

[18]  P. Dorato Undergraduate control education in the US , 1999 .

[19]  Chaouki T. Abdallah,et al.  A Survey of Engineering Education Outside the United States: Implications for the Ideal Engineering Program , 1993 .