Digital Technologies and the Nature and Routine Intensity of Work: Evidence from Hungarian Manufacturing Subsidiaries

This paper explores the impact of digital technologies on the nature and routine intensity of shopfloor work, the ways in which digital technologies exert their effects and the factors moderating the outcomes of digitalisation in respect of work. The effect of technology cannot be limited to a dichotomy of increasing versus decreasing degrees of routine. Instead, there are basic scenarios as far as the routine content of activities is concerned: a) no change in routine; b) increased routine; c) transformed routine; d) reduced routine. More specifically, drawing on data from Hungarian companies, we discuss the multiple ways that technology affects the nature and routineness of work. These include (i) workload and intensity of work; (ii) the degree to which tasks can be explicitly defined, measured and codified; (iii) task spectrum, i.e. the variability, complexity and diversity of work tasks; (iv) the composition and amount of skills required for task execution; (v) the importance of experience or tacit knowledge for task execution; and (vi) the value added of work tasks. Evidence indicates that the qualitative enrichment of shopfloor work and digital technology-induced reduction in the routine content of job tasks apply only to relatively skilled employees, albeit not exclusively in high-level shopfloor functions. It is argued that the beneficial effects of digital technologies materialise only if employees are skilled enough to be upskilled and become engaged not only in digitally-assisted but also in digitally-augmented, high-value activities.

[1]  A. Moniz,et al.  Robots Working with Humans or Humans Working with Robots? Searching for Social Dimensions in New Human-Robot Interaction in Industry , 2016 .

[2]  H. Braverman Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century , 1996 .

[3]  Christoph Herrmann,et al.  Industry 4.0 Impacts on Lean Production Systems , 2017 .

[4]  Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi,et al.  In the age of the smart artificial intelligence: AI’s dual capacities for automating and informating work , 2019, Business Information Review.

[5]  David H. Autor,et al.  Replication data for: Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automation , 2019 .

[6]  Nariaki Nishino,et al.  Adaptive automation and human factors in manufacturing: An experimental assessment for a cognitive approach , 2018 .

[7]  Hans Wortmann,et al.  Impact of Technology on Work: Technical Functionalities that Give Rise to New Job Designs in Industry 4.0 , 2017, APMS.

[8]  F. Chan,et al.  The link between Industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing: mapping current research and establishing a research agenda , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[9]  J. Zysman,et al.  Intelligent Tools and Digital Platforms: Implications for Work and Employment , 2017, Intereconomics.

[10]  H. Kagermann Change Through Digitization—Value Creation in the Age of Industry 4.0 , 2015 .

[11]  A. Szalavetz Digitalisation, automation and upgrading in global value chains – factory economy actors versus lead companies , 2019, Post-Communist Economies.

[12]  Robert A. Burgelman Bridging history and reductionism: A key role for longitudinal qualitative research , 2011, Research Methods in International Business.

[13]  Gaaitzen J. de Vries,et al.  Technology, offshoring and the rise of non-routine jobs , 2018, Journal of Development Economics.

[14]  Ying Zhao,et al.  A survey of visualization for smart manufacturing , 2018, Journal of Visualization.

[15]  P. Pavlínek,et al.  Foreign investment in eastern and southern Europe after 2008. Still a lever of growth , 2015 .

[16]  Johan Stahre,et al.  TOWARDS AN OPERATOR 4.0 TYPOLOGY: A HUMAN-CENTRIC PERSPECTIVE ON THE FOURTH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION TECHNOLOGIES , 2016 .

[17]  Magnus Holm,et al.  The future shop-floor operators, demands, requirements and interpretations , 2018 .

[18]  Guido Matias Cortes,et al.  Are Routine Jobs Moving South? Evidence from Changes in the Occupational Structure of Employment in the U.S. And Mexico , 2020, WIDER Working Paper.

[19]  David Autor,et al.  The Growth of Low Skill Service Jobs and the Polarization of the U.S. Labor Market , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[20]  János Abonyi,et al.  Enabling Technologies for Operator 4.0: A Survey , 2018, Applied Sciences.

[21]  Michael Marien,et al.  Book Review: The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies , 2014 .

[22]  Mariagrazia Squicciarini,et al.  The Routine Content of Occupations: New Cross-country Measures Based on PIAAC , 2016 .

[23]  H. Hirsch-Kreinsen Digitization of industrial work: development paths and prospects , 2016 .

[25]  A. Richter,et al.  “Power to the workers” , 2019, International Journal of Operations & Production Management.

[26]  J. Nagy,et al.  Tapasztalatok az ipar 4.0-val – egy esetalapú elemzés , 2019, Vezetéstudomány / Budapest Management Review.

[27]  John Paul Macduffie,et al.  The Adoption of High‐Involvement Work Practices , 1996 .

[28]  Eleonora Peruffo,et al.  How computerisation is transforming jobs : Evidence from the Eurofound ' s European Working Conditions Survey , 2019 .

[29]  M. Attaran,et al.  Technology and Organizational Change , 2019 .

[30]  Matteo Gaddi Technological and organisational innovation under Industry 4.0 – Impact on working conditions in the Italian automotive supply sector , 2020 .

[31]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Data in Action: Data-Driven Decision Making in U.S. Manufacturing , 2016 .

[32]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[33]  Jan vom Brocke,et al.  Digital Nudging , 2016, Business & Information Systems Engineering.

[34]  Päivi Heikkilä,et al.  Empowering and engaging industrial workers with Operator 4.0 solutions , 2020, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[35]  Davide Consoli,et al.  That Was then, this is Now: Skills and Routinization in the 2000s. , 2014 .

[36]  N. McGlynn Thinking fast and slow. , 2014, Australian veterinary journal.

[37]  Martin Krzywdzinski,et al.  Automation, Skill Requirements and Labour‐Use Strategies: High‐Wage and Low‐Wage Approaches to High‐Tech Manufacturing in the Automotive Industry , 2017 .

[38]  R. Baldwin,et al.  Global Supply Chains: Why They Emerged, Why They Matter, and Where They are Going , 2012 .

[39]  Michael A. Osborne,et al.  The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? , 2017 .

[40]  Agnieszka Piasna Counting Gigs: How Can we Measure the Scale of Online Platform Work? , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[41]  A. Szalavetz Digital transformation and local manufacturing subsidiaries in central and eastern Europe: Changing prospects for upgrading? , 2020 .

[42]  M. Arntz,et al.  The Risk of Automation for Jobs in OECD Countries: A Comparative Analysis , 2016 .

[43]  A. Park,et al.  The global distribution of routine and non-routine work , 2020, WIDER Working Paper.

[44]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  The "Age of Smart Machine": A 21st Century View , 2011 .

[45]  Manfred Tscheligi,et al.  Reflections on Operators' and Maintenance Engineers' Experiences of Smart Factories , 2018, GROUP.

[46]  Yves L. Doz,et al.  Qualitative research for international business , 2011 .

[47]  C. Mako Neo- instead of post-Fordism: the transformation of labour processes in Hungary , 2005 .

[48]  L. Bellmann,et al.  Controlling Working Crowds: The Impact of Digitalization on Worker Autonomy and Monitoring Across Hierarchical Levels , 2019, Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik.

[49]  Martin Krzywdzinski,et al.  The Social Consequences of the Digital Revolution , 2018, Le grandi questioni sociali del nostro tempo.

[50]  M. Sass FDI trends and patterns in electronics , 2015 .

[51]  P. Lewandowski,et al.  A routine transition in the digital era? The rise of routine work in Central and Eastern Europe , 2017 .

[52]  M. Arntz,et al.  The Impact of Technological Innovation on the Future of Work , 2019 .

[53]  Milovan Lazarevic,et al.  A Systematic Literature Review of Poka-Yoke and Novel Approach to Theoretical Aspects , 2019, Strojniški vestnik – Journal of Mechanical Engineering.

[54]  Survey Visualization , .

[55]  Abigail Marks,et al.  Industrie 4.0 in the Making – Discourse Patterns and the Rise of Digital Despotism , 2017 .

[56]  D. Gallie The Quality of Work in a Changing Labour Market , 2017 .

[57]  P. Pavlínek Dependent Growth: Foreign Investment and the Development of the Automotive Industry in East-Central Europe , 2017 .

[58]  Enghin Atalay,et al.  The Evolution of Work in the United States , 2020 .

[59]  Indhira. Santos,et al.  The Skill Content of Occupations Across Low and Middle Income Countries: Evidence from Harmonized Data , 2016, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[60]  Lawrence F. Katz,et al.  Computing Inequality: Have Computers Changed the Labor Market? , 1997 .

[61]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power , 1989 .

[62]  Daron Acemoglu,et al.  The Race between Man and Machine: Implications of Technology for Growth, Factor Shares, and Employment , 2018, American Economic Review.

[63]  R. Piekkari,et al.  Theorising from case studies: Towards a pluralist future for international business research , 2011, Research Methods in International Business.

[64]  Daron Acemoglu,et al.  Automation and New Tasks: How Technology Displaces and Reinstates Labor , 2019, Journal of Economic Perspectives.

[65]  Tullio Tolio,et al.  Design and management of manufacturing systems for production quality , 2014 .

[66]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  Race against the machine : how the digital revolution is accelerating innovation, driving productivity, and irreversibly transforming employment and the economy , 2011 .

[67]  László Monostori,et al.  Cooperative and responsive manufacturing enterprises , 2011 .

[68]  Antonio Padovano,et al.  Smart operators in industry 4.0: A human-centered approach to enhance operators' capabilities and competencies within the new smart factory context , 2017, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[69]  A. Manning,et al.  Lousy and Lovely Jobs: The Rising Polarization of Work in Britain , 2007, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[70]  A. Szalavetz Industry 4.0 and capability development in manufacturing subsidiaries , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[71]  Jacques Bughin,et al.  A future that works: automation, employment, and productivity , 2017 .

[72]  David Autor,et al.  Skills, Tasks and Technologies: Implications for Employment and Earnings , 2010 .

[73]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[74]  P. Csizmadia,et al.  Changes in work from the global value change perspective: the case of transformation economies : Bulgaria and Hungary , 2011 .

[75]  A. Manning,et al.  Explaining Job Polarization: Routine-Biased Technological Change and Offshoring , 2014 .

[76]  M. Geppert,et al.  Cross-Border Standardisation and Reorganisation in European Multinational Companies , 2018 .

[77]  R. Stake The art of case study research , 1995 .

[78]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[79]  Sabine Pfeiffer,et al.  Robots, Industry 4.0 and Humans, or Why Assembly Work Is More than Routine Work , 2016 .