The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning: Multimedia Learning About Physical Systems

[1]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Effects of textual and animated orienting activities and practice on learning from computer-based instruction , 1988 .

[2]  M. Hegarty,et al.  Individual differences in mental animation during mechanical reasoning , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[3]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Animation, incidental learning, and continuing motivation , 1991 .

[4]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  External cognition: how do graphical representations work? , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[5]  H. Hecht,et al.  Influence of animation on dynamical judgments. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Analog Imagery in Mental Model Reasoning: Depictive Models , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  M. Hegarty,et al.  Learning With Real Machines or Diagrams: Application of Knowledge to Real-World Problems , 1995 .

[8]  Susan Palmiter,et al.  Animated Demonstrations vs Written Instructions for Learning Procedural Tasks: A Preliminary Investigation , 1991, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[9]  M. Hegarty.  Mental animation: inferring motion from static displays of mechanical systems. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Shuttling Between Depictive Models and Abstract Rules: Induction and Fallback , 1996, Cogn. Sci..

[11]  G R Norman,et al.  Do virtual computer models hinder anatomy learning? , 1999, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[12]  Yael Kali,et al.  Spatial abilities of high‐school students in the perception of geologic structures , 1996 .

[13]  Leonid Rozenblit,et al.  The misunderstood limits of folk science: an illusion of explanatory depth , 2002, Cogn. Sci..

[14]  R. Mayer,et al.  Animations need narrations : an experimental test of a dual-coding hypothesis , 1991 .

[15]  R. Mayer,et al.  For whom is a picture worth a thousand words? Extensions of a dual-coding theory of multimedia learning. , 1994 .

[16]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  The Roles of Mental Animations and External Animations in Understanding Mechanical Systems , 2003 .

[17]  G. Norman,et al.  How medical students learn spatial anatomy , 2001, The Lancet.

[18]  Ok-choon Park,et al.  Selective use of animation and feedback in computer-based instruction , 1992 .

[19]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Are Good Texts Always Better? Interactions of Text Coherence, Background Knowledge, and Levels of Understanding in Learning From Text , 1996 .

[20]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Animation: can it facilitate? , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[21]  Richard Lowe,et al.  Animation and learning: selective processing of information in dynamic graphics , 2003 .

[22]  R. Mayer,et al.  A coherence effect in multimedia learning: The case for minimizing irrelevant sounds in the design of multimedia instructional messages. , 2000 .

[23]  Richard K. Lowe.  Extracting information from an animation during complex visual learning , 1999 .

[24]  N. Hari Narayanan,et al.  Multimedia design for communication of dynamic information , 2002, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[25]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  The Effects of Computer Animated Elaboration Strategies and Practice on Factual and Application Learning in an Elementary Science Lesson , 1989 .

[26]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Reasoning about the referent of a picture versus reasoning about the picture as the referent: An effect of visual realism , 1995, Memory & cognition.

[27]  N. J. Slamecka,et al.  The Generation Effect: Delineation of a Phenomenon , 1978 .

[28]  S. Schwan,et al.  The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: learning to tie nautical knots , 2004 .

[29]  Leo Joskowicz,et al.  Understanding Mechanical Motion: From Images to Behaviors , 1999, Artif. Intell..

[30]  M. Hegarty.  Mechanical reasoning by mental simulation , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  M A Just,et al.  Constraints on the processing of rolling motion: the curtate cycloid illusion. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  Susan Palmiter,et al.  Animated Demonstrations for Learning Procedural Computer-Based Tasks , 1993, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[33]  S. Ainsworth,et al.  Multiple Forms of Dynamic Representation. , 2004 .

[34]  R. Mayer,et al.  Cognitive Principles of Multimedia Learning: The Role of Modality and Contiguity , 1999 .

[35]  Uwe Oestermeier,et al.  Verbal and visual causal arguments , 2000, Cognition.

[36]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Event structure in perception and conception. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[37]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Individual differences in use of diagrams as external memory in mechanical reasoning , 1997 .

[38]  M. Just,et al.  Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. , 1993 .

[39]  N. Hari Narayanan,et al.  On designing comprehensible interactive hypermedia manuals , 1998, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[40]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Using Computer Animated Graphics in Science Instruction with Children , 1990 .

[41]  M. Chi,et al.  Eliciting Self‐Explanations Improves Understanding , 1994 .

[42]  Joan K. Gallini,et al.  When Is an Illustration Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1990 .