Internal representations for face detection: An application of noise‐based image classification to BOLD responses

What basic visual structures underlie human face detection and how can we extract such structures directly from the amplitude of neural responses elicited by face processing? Here, we address these issues by investigating an extension of noise‐based image classification to BOLD responses recorded in high‐level visual areas. First, we assess the applicability of this classification method to such data and, second, we explore its results in connection with the neural processing of faces. To this end, we construct luminance templates from white noise fields based on the response of face‐selective areas in the human ventral cortex. Using behaviorally and neurally‐derived classification images, our results reveal a family of simple but robust image structures subserving face representation and detection. Thus, we confirm the role played by classical face selective regions in face detection and we help clarify the representational basis of this perceptual function. From a theory standpoint, our findings support the idea of simple but highly diagnostic neurally‐coded features for face detection. At the same time, from a methodological perspective, our work demonstrates the ability of noise‐based image classification in conjunction with fMRI to help uncover the structure of high‐level perceptual representations. Hum Brain Mapp 34:3101–3115, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[2]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Biology and Cognitive Development: The Case of Face Recognition , 1993 .

[3]  P. Green Biology and Cognitive Development: the Case of Face Recognition, Mark H. Johnson, John Morton. Blackwell, Oxford (1991), x, +180. Price £35.00 hardback, £10.95 paperback , 1992 .

[4]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of functional MRI time‐series , 1994, Human Brain Mapping.

[5]  E Peli,et al.  Image enhancement for the visually impaired: the effects of enhancement on face recognition. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[6]  I. Craw,et al.  Effects of high-pass and low-pass spatial filtering on face identification , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[8]  T. Allison,et al.  Differential Sensitivity of Human Visual Cortex to Faces, Letterstrings, and Textures: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  D. Field,et al.  Natural image statistics and efficient coding. , 1996, Network.

[10]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[11]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[13]  T. Poggio,et al.  Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  R. Näsänen Spatial frequency bandwidth used in the recognition of facial images , 1999, Vision Research.

[15]  K. Nakayama,et al.  RESPONSE PROPERTIES OF THE HUMAN FUSIFORM FACE AREA , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[16]  M. Tarr,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area is Part of a Network that Processes Faces at the Individual Level , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  P. Bennett,et al.  Deriving behavioural receptive fields for visually completed contours , 2000, Current Biology.

[19]  Frédéric Gosselin,et al.  Bubbles: a technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks , 2001, Vision Research.

[20]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[21]  A. Ahumada Classification image weights and internal noise level estimation. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[22]  Pawan Sinha,et al.  Qualitative Representations for Recognition , 2002, Biologically Motivated Computer Vision.

[23]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Stages of processing in face perception: an MEG study , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[24]  Joshua A Solomon,et al.  Noise reveals visual mechanisms of detection and discrimination. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[25]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  Classification image analysis: estimation and statistical inference for two-alternative forced-choice experiments. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[26]  Michel Vidal-Naquet,et al.  Visual features of intermediate complexity and their use in classification , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  Richard F Murray,et al.  Optimal methods for calculating classification images: weighted sums. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[28]  M. Seghier,et al.  A network of occipito-temporal face-sensitive areas besides the right middle fusiform gyrus is necessary for normal face processing. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  P. Schyns,et al.  Superstitious Perceptions Reveal Properties of Internal Representations , 2003, Psychological science.

[30]  Dario L. Ringach,et al.  Reverse correlation in neurophysiology , 2004, Cogn. Sci..

[31]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[32]  R. Dolan,et al.  fMRI-adaptation reveals dissociable neural representations of identity and expression in face perception. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  P. Neri Estimation of nonlinear psychophysical kernels. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[34]  Paul A. Viola,et al.  Robust Real-Time Face Detection , 2001, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[35]  T. Busey,et al.  Seeing faces in the noise: Stochastic activity in perceptual regions of the brain may influence the perception of ambiguous stimuli , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[36]  Galia Avidan,et al.  Detailed Exploration of Face-related Processing in Congenital Prosopagnosia: 1. Behavioral Findings , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  Conny F. Schmidt,et al.  Face perception is mediated by a distributed cortical network , 2005, Brain Research Bulletin.

[38]  Philippe G Schyns,et al.  Accurate statistical tests for smooth classification images. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[39]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Newborns' preference for face-relevant stimuli: effects of contrast polarity. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  Rafael Malach,et al.  Detailed Exploration of Face-related Processing in Congenital Prosopagnosia: 2. Functional Neuroimaging Findings , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  H. Wilson,et al.  fMRI evidence for the neural representation of faces , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[42]  Mark H. Johnson Subcortical face processing , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[43]  Gilles Pourtois,et al.  View-independent coding of face identity in frontal and temporal cortices is modulated by familiarity: an event-related fMRI study , 2005, NeuroImage.

[44]  H. Halit,et al.  Is high-spatial frequency information used in the early stages of face detection? , 2006, Brain Research.

[45]  D. Levi,et al.  Receptive versus perceptive fields from the reverse-correlation viewpoint , 2006, Vision Research.

[46]  E. Halgren,et al.  Top-down facilitation of visual recognition. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  Sheng He,et al.  Cortical Responses to Invisible Faces: Dissociating Subsystems for Facial-Information Processing , 2006, Current Biology.

[48]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces , 2006, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[49]  Tobias Egner,et al.  Cerebral Cortex doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi129 Mistaking a House for a Face: Neural Correlates of Misperception in Healthy Humans , 2005 .

[50]  Shimon Ullman,et al.  Mutual information of image fragments predicts categorization in humans: Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence , 2007, Vision Research.

[51]  J. Haxby,et al.  Neural systems for recognition of familiar faces , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[52]  Marian Stewart Bartlett,et al.  Information maximization in face processing , 2007, Neurocomputing.

[53]  R. Goebel,et al.  Individual faces elicit distinct response patterns in human anterior temporal cortex , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[54]  Marie L. Smith,et al.  From a face to its category via a few information processing states in the brain , 2007, NeuroImage.

[55]  Xiaoping P. Hu,et al.  Real‐time fMRI using brain‐state classification , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[56]  Lars Muckli,et al.  Classification images reveal the information sensitivity of brain voxels in fMRI , 2008, NeuroImage.

[57]  R. DeCharms Applications of real-time fMRI , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[58]  M. Keil Does face image statistics predict a preferred spatial frequency for human face processing? , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[59]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  The distribution of category and location information across object-selective regions in human visual cortex , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[60]  Jie Tian,et al.  BRAIN IMAGING NEUROREPORT , 2007 .

[61]  M. Tarr,et al.  Gender Recognition of Human Faces Using Color , 2008, Psychological science.

[62]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Mechanisms of face perception. , 2008, Annual review of neuroscience.

[63]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  Comparing face patch systems in macaques and humans , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[64]  Masa-aki Sato,et al.  Visual Image Reconstruction from Human Brain Activity using a Combination of Multiscale Local Image Decoders , 2008, Neuron.

[65]  Michael J. Tarr,et al.  Task-Specific Codes for Face Recognition: How they Shape the Neural Representation of Features for Detection and Individuation , 2008, PloS one.

[66]  R Goebel,et al.  Inverse mapping the neuronal substrates of face categorizations. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[67]  N. Dupuis-Roy,et al.  Uncovering gender discrimination cues in a realistic setting. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[68]  Robert J. Butera,et al.  Sequential Optimal Design of Neurophysiology Experiments , 2009, Neural Computation.

[69]  P. Sinha,et al.  Role of ordinal contrast relationships in face encoding , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[70]  Roberto Caldara,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area responds automatically to statistical regularities optimal for face categorization , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[71]  Timothy J Andrews,et al.  Linearity of the fMRI response in category‐selective regions of human visual cortex , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[72]  Doris Y. Tsao,et al.  A face feature space in the macaque temporal lobe , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[73]  Jimin Liang,et al.  A distributed neural system for top-down face processing , 2009, Neuroscience Letters.

[74]  Jiye G. Kim,et al.  Adaptation in the fusiform face area (FFA): Image or person? , 2009, Vision Research.

[75]  Markus Bindemann,et al.  The Role of Color in Human Face Detection , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[76]  Ryan J. Prenger,et al.  Bayesian Reconstruction of Natural Images from Human Brain Activity , 2009, Neuron.

[77]  Giuseppe Iaria,et al.  The correlates of subjective perception of identity and expression in the face network: An fMRI adaptation study , 2009, NeuroImage.

[78]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Everything You Never Wanted to Know about Circular Analysis, but Were Afraid to Ask , 2010, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[79]  Michael B. Miller,et al.  How reliable are the results from functional magnetic resonance imaging? , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[80]  Patrik Vuilleumier,et al.  Top-down activation of fusiform cortex without seeing faces in prosopagnosia. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[81]  H. Wilson,et al.  Face recognition: Are viewpoint and identity processed after face detection? , 2010, Vision Research.

[82]  Pawan Sinha,et al.  Qualitative Representations for Recognition , 2002, Biologically Motivated Computer Vision.

[83]  Robert F. Hess,et al.  Extracting the internal representation of faces from human brain activity: An analogue to reverse correlation , 2010, NeuroImage.

[84]  Jie Tian,et al.  Faces in the mist: illusory face and letter detection , 2011, i-Perception.

[85]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  Unraveling the distributed neural code of facial identity through spatiotemporal pattern analysis , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[86]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Pattern-information analysis: From stimulus decoding to computational-model testing , 2011, NeuroImage.

[87]  Brittany S. Cassidy,et al.  Lower-Level Stimulus Features Strongly Influence Responses in the Fusiform Face Area , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[88]  Wolfgang Einhäuser,et al.  Faces in Places: Humans and Machines Make Similar Face Detection Errors , 2011, PloS one.

[89]  H. B. Barlow,et al.  Possible Principles Underlying the Transformations of Sensory Messages , 2012 .

[90]  P. Schyns,et al.  Measuring Internal Representations from Behavioral and Brain Data , 2012, Current Biology.

[91]  Nicolas Davidenko,et al.  Face‐likeness and image variability drive responses in human face‐selective ventral regions , 2012, Human brain mapping.