A microscopic look at WiFi fingerprinting for indoor mobile phone localization in diverse environments

WiFi fingerprinting has received much attention for indoor mobile phone localization. In this study, we examine the impact of various aspects underlying a WiFi fingerprinting system. Specifically, we investigate different definitions for fingerprinting and location estimation algorithms across different indoor environments ranging from a multi-storey office building to shopping centers of different sizes. Our results show that the fingerprint definition is as important as the choice of location estimation algorithm and there is no single combination of these two that works across all environments or even all floors of a given environment. We then consider the effect of WiFi frequency bands (e.g., 2.4GHz and 5GHz) and the presence of virtual access points (VAPs) on location accuracy with WiFi fingerprinting. Our results demonstrate that 5GHz signals are less prone to variation and thus yield more accurate location estimation. We also find that the presence of VAPs improves location estimation accuracy.

[1]  Seth J. Teller,et al.  Growing an organic indoor location system , 2010, MobiSys '10.

[2]  Moustafa Youssef,et al.  The Horus location determination system , 2008 .

[3]  Paramvir Bahl,et al.  RADAR: an in-building RF-based user location and tracking system , 2000, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2000. Conference on Computer Communications. Nineteenth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies (Cat. No.00CH37064).

[4]  Anshul Rai,et al.  Zee: zero-effort crowdsourcing for indoor localization , 2012, Mobicom '12.

[5]  P. Mahalanobis On the generalized distance in statistics , 1936 .

[6]  Andrew G. Dempster,et al.  Differences in RSSI readings made by different Wi-Fi chipsets: A limitation of WLAN localization , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Localization and GNSS (ICL-GNSS).

[7]  Simo Ali-Löytty,et al.  A comparative survey of WLAN location fingerprinting methods , 2009, 2009 6th Workshop on Positioning, Navigation and Communication.

[8]  Prashant Krishnamurthy,et al.  Analysis of WLAN's received signal strength indication for indoor location fingerprinting , 2012, Pervasive Mob. Comput..

[9]  Hojung Cha,et al.  Wi-Fi Fingerprint-Based Topological Map Building for Indoor User Tracking , 2010, 2010 IEEE 16th International Conference on Embedded and Real-Time Computing Systems and Applications.

[10]  Philipp Bolliger,et al.  Redpin - adaptive, zero-configuration indoor localization through user collaboration , 2008, MELT '08.