Stiffness Bounds for Resilient and Stable Physical Interaction of Articulated Soft Robots

It is widely recognized that impedance modulation is a key aspect in applications in which robots significantly interact with the environment or humans. Either active impedance controllers or actuators with passive variable impedance can be exploited to modulate the impedance. However, methods capable of determining the right (constant or time-varying) impedance profile in order to guarantee task performance as well as resilience and stability are required. In this letter, we discuss how task-related aspects, such as uncertainties, contact surface shapes, and interaction forces, set bounds on the admissible Cartesian stiffness. We recall that, an upper bound on the stiffness is required to prevent high forces exchanged during the interaction to guarantee adaptability and safety. Despite this, however, there is also a lower bound to be considered in order to preserve stability during the interaction. To this purpose, we study the interaction of a robot, with controllable Cartesian impedance, with a curved surface. Thus, we provide an analytic lower bound for the Cartesian stiffness that guarantees stability of such interaction task, and we prove that this bound directly depends on task parameters, namely contact force and surface curvature. Theoretical results are experimentally validated on robots powered by variable stiffness actuators and compliance controlled industrial robots.

[1]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  Robust optimization of system compliance for physical interaction in uncertain scenarios , 2016, 2016 IEEE-RAS 16th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids).

[2]  Oliver Brock,et al.  Analysis and Observations From the First Amazon Picking Challenge , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[3]  Neville Hogan,et al.  On the stability of manipulators performing contact tasks , 1988, IEEE J. Robotics Autom..

[4]  Mattia Poggiani,et al.  Humanoids at Work: The WALK-MAN Robot in a Postearthquake Scenario , 2018, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[5]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Impedance Control: An Approach to Manipulation: Part II—Implementation , 1985 .

[6]  Christian Ott Cartesian Impedance Control: The Rigid Body Case , 2008 .

[7]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  Variable impedance actuators: A review , 2013, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[8]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Safety Evaluation of Physical Human-Robot Interaction via Crash-Testing , 2007, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[9]  W. S. Newman Stability and Performance Limits of Interaction Controllers , 1992 .

[10]  Matteo Bianchi,et al.  Decentralized Trajectory Tracking Control for Soft Robots Interacting With the Environment , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[11]  Alessandro De Luca,et al.  Robot Collisions: A Survey on Detection, Isolation, and Identification , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.

[12]  Antonio Bicchi,et al.  Fast and "soft-arm" tactics [robot arm design] , 2004, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[13]  G. Oriolo,et al.  Robotics: Modelling, Planning and Control , 2008 .

[14]  Charles C. Kemp,et al.  Human-Robot Interaction for Cooperative Manipulation: Handing Objects to One Another , 2007, RO-MAN 2007 - The 16th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[15]  Toru Tsumugiwa,et al.  Stability Analysis for Impedance Control of Robot in Human-Robot Cooperative Task System , 2007 .

[16]  Cecilia Laschi,et al.  Soft robotics: a bioinspired evolution in robotics. , 2013, Trends in biotechnology.

[17]  Giorgio Grioli,et al.  The Quest for Natural Machine Motion: An Open Platform to Fast-Prototyping Articulated Soft Robots , 2017, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[18]  Alin Albu-Schäffer,et al.  Cartesian impedance control of redundant robots: recent results with the DLR-light-weight-arms , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[19]  Peter J. Beek,et al.  Impedance is modulated to meet accuracy demands during goal-directed arm movements , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  Masayuki Inaba,et al.  Footstep planning among obstacles for biped robots , 2001, Proceedings 2001 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. Expanding the Societal Role of Robotics in the the Next Millennium (Cat. No.01CH37180).

[21]  Takayoshi Yamada,et al.  Grasp stability analysis considering the curvatures at contact points , 1996, Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[22]  Manuel G. Catalano,et al.  Passive impedance control of a multi-DOF VSA-CubeBot manipulator , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.