War Cues and Foreign Policy Acts

Cognitive psychological theory and research suggest that specific actions are primed or potentiated by prior related cues. Thus violent cues should influence subsequent conflictual action choices. Laboratory subjects were given one of two written vignettes recalling either the slaughter of World War I or Allied weakness before World War II. A control group received no vignette. Subjects were then asked to specify foreign-policy choices from an inventory of possible cooperative-conflictual acts, relevant to a dispute between two fictional countries, in five sequential rounds. Both war vignettes produced more subsequent conflictual choices for subjects with dominant (i.e., aggressive) personality traits, and less conflictual choices for subjects with submissive personality traits. The findings suggest that priming activates underlying personality predispositions that enhance cooperative or conflictual action choices. The results also point to the potential importance of prior cues in shaping foreign-policy decision makers' and mass-public responses to international events.

[1]  Discontinuities in the symbolic environment: A problem in scaling , 1976 .

[2]  Ernest R. May,et al.  Thinking in Time: The Uses of History for Decision-Makers by Richard E. Neustadt, Ernest R. May (review) , 1987, Technology and Culture.

[3]  E. Azar The Conflict and Peace Data Bank (COPDAB) Project , 1980 .

[4]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[5]  P. Johnson-Laird Mental models , 1989 .

[6]  W. Hamilton,et al.  The Evolution of Cooperation , 1984 .

[7]  Ernest R. May,et al.  "Lessons" of the Past: The Use and Misuse of History in American Foreign Policy , 1974 .

[8]  J. Bargh,et al.  Automatic information processing and social perception: The influence of trait information presented outside of conscious awareness on impression formation. , 1982 .

[9]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Recall of Previously Unrecallable Information Following a Shift in Perspective. Technical Report No. 41. , 1977 .

[10]  Preferences Scientific Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. , 1982 .

[11]  Frederick Hayes-Roth,et al.  AN OVERVIEW OF PATTERN-DIRECTED INFERENCE SYSTEMS , 1978 .

[12]  Harry F. Evarts Introduction to PERT , 1964 .

[13]  Stephen J. Read,et al.  Analogical reasoning in social judgment: The importance of causal theories. , 1984 .

[14]  John W. Spanier Games Nations Play: Analyzing International Politics , 1972 .

[15]  Donald A. Waterman,et al.  Pattern-Directed Inference Systems , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[16]  Ernest R. May,et al.  Thinking in Time: The Uses of History for Decision-Makers , 1986 .

[17]  Brent D. Ruben,et al.  Information and behavior , 1985 .

[18]  M. Bradley,et al.  Studies of the long-term recency effect: Support for a contextually guided retrieval hypothesis. , 1983 .

[19]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[20]  David W. Ziegler,et al.  War, peace, and international politics , 1977 .

[21]  John R. Anderson Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications , 1980 .

[22]  T. Gilovich,et al.  Seeing the past in the present: The effect of associations to familiar events on judgments and decisions. , 1981 .

[23]  L. Sigelman,et al.  PRESIDENTIAL IDENTIFICATION AND POLICY LEADERSHIP: EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE ON THE REAGAN CASE , 1984 .

[24]  L. Etheredge Personality Effects on American Foreign Policy, 1898–1968: A Test of Interpersonal Generalization Theory , 1978, American Political Science Review.

[25]  H. Roediger,et al.  Memory metaphors in cognitive psychology , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[26]  John R. Anderson A spreading activation theory of memory. , 1983 .

[27]  E. Higgins,et al.  Individual construct accessibility and subjective impressions and recall. , 1982 .

[28]  R. Porter SEEING THE PAST , 1988 .

[29]  John A. Bargh,et al.  The additive nature of chronic and temporary sources of construct accessibility. , 1986 .