Born in an Alien Nest : How Do Social Parasite Male Offspring Escape from Host Aggression?

Social parasites exploit the colony resources of social insects. Some of them exploit the host colony as a food resource or as a shelter whereas other species also exploit the brood care behavior of their social host. Some of these species have even lost the worker caste and rely completely on the host's worker force to rear their offspring. To avoid host defenses and bypass their recognition code, these social parasites have developed several sophisticated chemical infiltration strategies. These infiltration strategies have been highly studied in several hymenopterans. Once a social parasite has successfully entered a host nest and integrated its social system, its emerging offspring still face the same challenge of avoiding host recognition. However, the strategy used by the offspring to survive within the host nest without being killed is still poorly documented. In cuckoo bumblebees, the parasite males completely lack the morphological and chemical adaptations to social parasitism that the females possess. Moreover, young parasite males exhibit an early production of species-specific cephalic secretions, used as sexual pheromones. Host workers might thus be able to recognize them. Here we used a bumblebee host-social parasite system to test the hypothesis that social parasite male offspring exhibit a chemical defense strategy to escape from host aggression during their intranidal life. Using behavioral assays, we showed that extracts from the heads of young cuckoo bumblebee males contain a repellent odor that prevents parasite males from being attacked by host workers. We also show that social parasitism reduces host worker aggressiveness and helps parasite offspring acceptance.

[1]  H. Topoff,et al.  Colony Founding by Queens of the Obligatory Slave-making Ant, Polyergus breviceps: The Role of the Dufour's Gland1 , 2010 .

[2]  M. Duchateau Agonistic behaviours in colonies of the bumblebeeBombus terrestris , 1989, Journal of Ethology.

[3]  A. Hefetz,et al.  The defensive secretion of the tiger beetleCicindela flexuosa (F.) (Cicindelinae; Carabidae) , 1984, Experientia.

[4]  J. Herbers,et al.  Nest mate recognition in ants with complex colonies: within- and between-population variation , 2000 .

[5]  B. Hölldobler,et al.  The kin recognition system of carpenter ants (Camponotus spp.) , 1986, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[6]  B. Lavine,et al.  Changes in the Cuticular Hydrocarbon Profile of the Slave-Maker Ant Queen, Polyergus breviceps Emery, After Killing a Formica Host Queen (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 2001, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[7]  C. Errard Development of interspecific recognition behavior in the antsManica rubida andFormica selysi (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) reared in mixed-species groups , 2005, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[8]  N. Davies,et al.  Cuckoos, Cowbirds and Other Cheats , 2000 .

[9]  J. Strassmann,et al.  Why are larvae of the social parasite wasp Polistes sulcifer not removed from the host nest? , 2008, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[10]  V. Soroker,et al.  The postpharyngeal gland as a “Gestalt” organ for nestmate recognition in the antCataglyphis niger , 1994, Naturwissenschaften.

[11]  S. Härtel,et al.  Infestation levels of Apis mellifera scutellata swarms by socially parasitic Cape honeybee workers (Apis mellifera capensis). , 2006 .

[12]  M. C. Lorenzi,et al.  Social wasp parasites affect the nestmate recognition abilities of their hosts (Polistes atrimandibularis and P. biglumis, Hymenoptera, Vespidae) , 2003, Insectes Sociaux.

[13]  K. Jaffe,et al.  Leaf-cutter ant species (Hymenoptera: Atta) differ in the types of cues used to differentiate between self and others , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[14]  R. Boulay,et al.  Nest volatiles as modulators of nestmate recognition in the ant Camponotus fellah. , 2008, Journal of insect physiology.

[15]  S. Martin,et al.  Is the social parasite Vespa dybowskii using chemical transparency to get her eggs accepted? , 2008, Journal of insect physiology.

[16]  J. V. van Zweden,et al.  Disentangling environmental and heritable nestmate recognition cues in a carpenter ant. , 2009, Journal of insect physiology.

[17]  D. Wittmann,et al.  Suppression of ovarian development of Bombus terrestris workers by B. terrestris queens, Psithyrus vestalis and Psithyrus bohemicus females , 2003 .

[18]  Q. Thomaslecoc,et al.  Molecular and chemical characters to evaluate species status of two cuckoo bumblebees : Bombus barbutellus and Bombus maxillosus ( Hymenoptera , Apidae , Bombini ) , 2011 .

[19]  B. G. Svensson,et al.  Changes With Age in Ultrastructure and Pheromone Content of Male Labial Glands in Some Bumble Bee Species (Hymneoptera, Apidae) , 1979 .

[20]  G. J. Blomquist,et al.  Ecological, behavioral, and biochemical aspects of insect hydrocarbons. , 2005, Annual review of entomology.

[21]  R. M. Fisher,et al.  MORPHOLOGICAL SPECIALIZATIONS OF THE BUMBLE BEE SOCIAL PARASITE PSITHYRUS ASHTONI (CRESSON) (HYMENOPTERA: APIDAE) , 1992, The Canadian Entomologist.

[22]  R. Cervo Polistes wasps and their social parasites: an overview , 2006 .

[23]  G. Bergström Chemical aspects of insect exocrine signals as a means for systematic and phylogenetic discussions in aculeate Hymenoptera , 1981 .

[24]  T. Akino,et al.  Repellent effect on host Formica workers of queen Dufour's gland secretion of the obligatory social parasite ant, Polyergus samurai (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). , 2009 .

[25]  J. Verhaeghe,et al.  Bumblebee inquilinism in Bombus (Fernaldaepsithyrus) sylvestris (Hymenoptera, Apidae): behavioural and chemical analyses of host-parasite interactions , 2005 .

[26]  A. Lenoir,et al.  Dufour's gland secretion as a repellent used during usurpation by the slave-maker ant Rossomyrmex minuchae. , 2005, Journal of insect physiology.

[27]  Thomas Lecocq,et al.  Molecular and chemical characters to evaluate species status of two cuckoo bumblebees: Bombus barbutellus and Bombus maxillosus (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Bombini) , 2011 .

[28]  Paul H. Williams,et al.  Host Specific Social Parasites (Psithyrus) Indicate Chemical Recognition System in Bumblebees , 2010, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[29]  J. Orivel,et al.  Coexistence between Cyphomyrmex ants and dominant populations of Wasmannia auropunctata , 2007, Behavioural Processes.

[30]  R. Cervo,et al.  The chemical strategies used by Polistes nimphus social wasp usurpers (Hymenoptera Vespidae) , 2007 .

[31]  A. Hefetz,et al.  Label familiarity and discriminatory ability of ants reared in mixed groups , 1997, Insectes Sociaux.

[32]  J. Orivel,et al.  Ant gardens: interspecific recognition in parabiotic ant species , 1997, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[33]  A. Hefetz,et al.  Sneak in or repel your enemy: Dufour's gland repellent as a strategy for successful usurpation in the slave-maker Polyergus rufescens , 2000, CHEMOECOLOGY.

[34]  S. Martin,et al.  Chemical deterrent enables a socially parasitic ant to invade multiple hosts , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[35]  B. Wisenden Alloparental care in fishes , 1999, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[36]  S. Turillazzi,et al.  Chemical Usurpation of a Nest by Paper Wasp Parasites , 1996, Science.

[37]  G. Bergström,et al.  Observations on scent marking by Bombus Latr. and Psithyrus Lep. males(Hym., Apidae) and localization of the site of production of the secretion , 1973 .

[38]  G. Bergström,et al.  Odor correspondence betweenMelitta females and males of their nest parasiteNomada flavopicta K. (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) , 2004, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[39]  C. Brooke Worth,et al.  The Insect Societies , 1973 .

[40]  B. Hölldobler,et al.  The kin recognition system of carpenter ants (Camponotus spp.) , 1987, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[41]  B. Hölldobler,et al.  Influence of virgin queens on kin recognition in the carpenter antCamponotus floridanus (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 1988, Insectes Sociaux.

[42]  L. Sundström,et al.  Egg recognition and social parasitism in Formica ants , 2011 .

[43]  H. Velthuis,et al.  Factors influencing the egg laying of workers in a captive Bombus terrestris colony , 1981, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[44]  A. Hefetz,et al.  Interspecific recognition in Chilean parabiotic ant species , 2003, Insectes Sociaux.

[45]  R. M. Fisher Queen-worker conflict and social parasitism in bumble bees (Hymenoptera: Apidae) , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[46]  J. Halík,et al.  Marking pheromones of the cuckoo bumblebee males (Hymenoptera, Apoidea, Bombus Latreille): compositions of labial gland secretions of six species found in the Czech Republic ☆ , 2004 .

[47]  A. Hefetz,et al.  Heterospecific substances in the postpharyngeal gland secretion of ants reared in mixed groups , 1992, Naturwissenschaften.

[48]  D. Grasso,et al.  Colony founding in Polyergus rufescens: the role of the Dufour's gland , 2000, Insectes Sociaux.

[49]  F. J. Sánchez,et al.  Hymenoptera, Apoidea I , 2004 .

[50]  Victoria Soroker,et al.  Nestmate recognition in the ant Cataglyphis niger : do queens matter? , 1998, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[51]  S. Turillazzi,et al.  Effects of social parasitism of polistes atrimandibularis on the colony cycle and brood production of polistes biglumis bimaculatus (Hymenoptera, Vespidae) , 1992 .

[52]  G. J. Blomquist,et al.  Cuticular hydrocarbons ofReticulitermes virginicus (Banks) and their role as potential species- and caste-recognition cues , 1982, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[53]  M. Beekman,et al.  Queenless colonies of the Asian red dwarf honey bee (Apis florea) are infiltrated by workers from other queenless colonies. , 2009 .

[54]  K. Dettner,et al.  CHEMICAL MIMICRY AND CAMOUFLAGE , 1994 .

[55]  A. Lenoir,et al.  Chemical ecology and social parasitism in ants. , 2001, Annual review of entomology.

[56]  Madeleine Beekman,et al.  When workers disunite: intraspecific parasitism by eusocial bees. , 2008, Annual review of entomology.

[57]  V. Soroker,et al.  Congruency of hydrocarbon patterns in heterospecific groups of ants: transfer and/or biosynthesis? , 1995, Insectes Sociaux.

[58]  A. Bagnères,et al.  Cuticular hydrocarbons in workers of the slave‐making ant Polyergus samurai and its slave, Formica japonica (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 2003 .

[59]  M. Obin,et al.  Mechanism of template-label matching in fire ant, Solenopsis invicta buren, nestmate recognition , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[60]  A. Lenoir,et al.  Blending in with the crowd: social parasites integrate into their host colonies using a flexible chemical signature , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[61]  M. Ayasse,et al.  How the social parasitic bumblebee Bombus bohemicus sneaks into power of reproduction , 2011, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[62]  G. Bergström,et al.  Cleptoparasitism and odor mimetism in bees: do nomada males imitate the odor of andrena females? , 1977, Science.

[63]  M. C. Lorenzi,et al.  Concealing identity and mimicking hosts: a dual chemical strategy for a single social parasite? (Polistes atrimandibularis, Hymenoptera: Vespidae) , 2002, Parasitology.

[64]  M. Ayasse,et al.  Chemical ecology involved in invasion success of the cuckoo bumblebee Psithyrus vestalis and in survival of workers of its host Bombus terrestris , 2009, Chemoecology.

[65]  K. Summers,et al.  Behavioral, ecological, and molecular genetic analyses of reproductive strategies in the Amazonian dart-poison frog, Dendrobates ventrimaculatus , 1997 .

[66]  C. M. Lessells,et al.  The Evolution of Life Histories , 1994 .

[67]  A. Lenoir,et al.  Effects of social isolation on hydrocarbon pattern and nestmate recognition in the ant Aphaenogaster senilis (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) , 2001, Insectes Sociaux.

[68]  H. Velthuis,et al.  Ovarian development and egg laying in workers of Bombus terrestris , 1989 .

[69]  S. Foitzik,et al.  Fight or flight? A geographic mosaic in host reaction and potency of a chemical weapon in the social parasite Harpagoxenus sublaevis , 2009, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[70]  R. Cervo Morphological adaptations to the parasitic life in Polistes sulcifer and P. atrimandibularis (Hymenoptera Vespidae) , 1994 .

[71]  J. Boomsma,et al.  Chemical mimicry in an incipient leaf-cutting ant social parasite , 2007, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[72]  I. Valterová,et al.  Premating Behavior of Bombus Confusus Males and Analysis of Their Labial Gland Secretion , 2004, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[73]  S. Turillazzi,et al.  Dufour’s gland contents of queens of the slave-making ant Polyergus rufescens and its host species Formica cunicularia , 2000 .

[74]  J. Boomsma,et al.  Communication between hosts and social parasites , 2008 .

[75]  Robin J Stuart Transient nestmate recognition cues contribute to a multicolonial population structure in the ant, Leptothorax curvispinosus , 1987, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[76]  P. Rasmont,et al.  A simplified protocol for bumble bee species identification by cephalic secretion analysis , 2011, Insectes Sociaux.

[77]  Nestmate discrimination and cuticular profiles of a temporary parasitic ant Lasius sp. and its host L. fuliginosus (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) , 2000, Journal of Ethology.

[78]  M. Ayasse,et al.  Do social parasitic bumblebees use chemical weapons? (Hymenoptera, Apidae) , 2003, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[79]  T. Akino,et al.  Chemical mimicry and host specificity in the butterfly Maculinea rebeli, a social parasite of Myrmica ant colonies , 1999, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[80]  M. C. Lorenzi,et al.  Species and Colony Components in the Recognition Odor of Young Social Wasps: Their Expression and Learning (Polistes biglumis and P. atrimandibularis; Hymenoptera: Vespidae) , 1999, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[81]  B. Lavine,et al.  Do these eggs smell funny to you?: an experimental study of egg discrimination by hosts of the social parasite Polyergus breviceps (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 2004, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[82]  R. Boulay,et al.  In-nest environment modulates nestmate recognition in the ant Camponotus fellah , 2004, Naturwissenschaften.

[83]  T. Marlovits,et al.  Are there pheromonal dominance signals in the bumblebee Bombus hypnorum L (Hymenoptera, Apidae)? , 1995 .

[84]  S. Turillazzi,et al.  Social Hackers: Integration in the Host Chemical Recognition System by a Paper Wasp Social Parasite , 2000, Naturwissenschaften.

[85]  M. Gross The Evolution of Parental Care , 2005, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[86]  M. Cammaerts,et al.  Age-dependent attractivity of males’ sexual pheromones in Bombus terrestris (L.) [Hymenoptera, Apidae] , 2011, Chemoecology.

[87]  G. Robinson,et al.  Effects of social conditions on Juvenile Hormone mediated reproductive development in Bombus terrestris workers , 1996 .