Analytics of time management and learning strategies for effective online learning in blended environments

This paper reports on the findings of a study that proposed a novel learning analytics methodology that combines three complimentary techniques - agglomerative hierarchical clustering, epistemic network analysis, and process mining. The methodology allows for identification and interpretation of self-regulated learning in terms of the use of learning strategies. The main advantage of the new technique over the existing ones is that it combines the time management and learning tactic dimensions of learning strategies, which are typically studied in isolation. The new technique allows for novel insights into learning strategies by studying the frequency of, strength of connections between, and ordering and time of execution of time management and learning tactics. The technique was validated in a study that was conducted on the trace data of first-year undergraduate students who were enrolled into two consecutive offerings (N2017 = 250 and N2018 = 232) of a course at an Australian university. The application of the proposed technique identified four strategy groups derived from three distinct time management tactics and five learning tactics. The tactics and strategies identified with the technique were correlated with academic performance and were interpreted according to the established theories and practices of self-regulated learning.

[1]  J. Dunlosky,et al.  Strengthening the Student Toolbox: Study Strategies to Boost Learning. , 2013 .

[2]  Allison Littlejohn,et al.  Self-regulated learning and knowledge sharing in the workplace , 2009 .

[3]  Abelardo Pardo,et al.  From Study Tactics to Learning Strategies: An Analytical Method for Extracting Interpretable Representations , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[4]  Birgit Loch,et al.  How to engage students in blended learning in a mathematics course: The students' views , 2016 .

[5]  Dragan Gasevic,et al.  Detecting Learning Strategies with Analytics: Links with Self-reported Measures and Academic Performance , 2017, J. Learn. Anal..

[6]  Abelardo Pardo,et al.  Analytics of Learning Strategies: Associations with Academic Performance and Feedback , 2019, LAK.

[7]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology , 2012 .

[8]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Self-Regulated Learning , 2016 .

[9]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Measuring Self-Regulated Learning , 2000 .

[10]  Eva Mary Bures,et al.  Interaction in distance education and online learning: using evidence and theory to improve practice , 2011, J. Comput. High. Educ..

[11]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Self-regulated learning and the allocation of study time. , 2011 .

[12]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Examining trace data to explore self-regulated learning , 2007 .

[13]  Sanne F. E. Rovers,et al.  How and Why Do Students Use Learning Strategies? A Mixed Methods Study on Learning Strategies and Desirable Difficulties With Effective Strategy Users , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[14]  John Dunlosky,et al.  The what, how much, and when of study strategies: comparing intended versus actual study behaviour , 2017, Memory.

[15]  K. C. Rachal,et al.  Learning problems reported by college students: are they using learning strategies? , 2007 .

[16]  Geraldine Clarebout,et al.  Students' tool-use within a web enhanced course: Explanatory mechanisms of students' tool-use pattern , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  Steven Brint,et al.  Undergraduate Time Use and Academic Outcomes: Results from the University of California Undergraduate Experience Survey 2006 , 2010, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[18]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction , 2010 .

[19]  Dragan Gasevic,et al.  Discovering Time Management Strategies in Learning Processes Using Process Mining Techniques , 2019, EC-TEL.

[20]  R. Azevedo,et al.  Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students' learning with hypermedia? , 2004 .

[21]  Marek Hatala,et al.  Analytics of communities of inquiry: Effects of learning technology use on cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions , 2015, Internet High. Educ..

[22]  Dragan Gasevic,et al.  Detection of Learning Strategies: A Comparison of Process, Sequence and Network Analytic Approaches , 2019, EC-TEL.

[23]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  A Perspective on State-of-the-art Research on Self-regulated Learning , 2005 .

[24]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Studying as self-regulated learning. , 1998 .

[25]  Geraldine Clarebout,et al.  Regulation of tool-use within a blended course: Student differences and performance effects , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[26]  Koen Vanhoof,et al.  bupaR: Enabling reproducible business process analysis , 2019, Knowl. Based Syst..

[27]  Mark Warschauer,et al.  The effects of flipped instruction on out-of-class study time, exam performance, and student perceptions , 2016 .

[28]  Lisa K. Son,et al.  Spacing one's study: evidence for a metacognitive control strategy. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[29]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  The promise and perils of self-regulated study , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[30]  Aaron S. Benjamin,et al.  Metacognitive control of the spacing of study repetitions , 2006 .

[31]  R. Bjork,et al.  Self-regulated learning: beliefs, techniques, and illusions. , 2013, Annual review of psychology.

[32]  Dragan Gasevic,et al.  Analytics of time management strategies in a flipped classroom , 2019, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[33]  Dragan Gasevic,et al.  Learning analytics to unveil learning strategies in a flipped classroom , 2017, Internet High. Educ..

[34]  Philip H. Winne,et al.  Issues in researching self-regulated learning as patterns of events , 2014 .

[35]  Sharon J. Derby Putting Learning Strategies to Work. , 1989 .