Attacking the Inverse Electromagnetic Problem of the Heart with Computationally Compatible Anatomical and Histological Knowledge

For over one hundred years the electrocardiogram (ECG) remains an extremely useful clinical tool and continues to play a major role in the evaluation and management of patients with known or suspected cardiac disease. Interpretation of the 12-lead ECG is a simplistic solution to the “inverse electromagnetic problem” for the electrical activity of the heart, which is to extract information about the instantaneous electrical state of the cardiac muscle from measurements of the body surface potentials that are generated from the electrical activity of the heart. Although adequate for patient management in most instances, there are conditions for which the sensitivity of the 12-lead ECG is suboptimal, as for example for the diagnosis of a posterior wall myocardial infarction. To enhance the diagnostic value of the ECG, one would need to address in depth and provide an actual solution to the inverse electromagnetic problem.

[1]  Peter M. van Dam,et al.  Volume conductor effects involved in the genesis of the P wave. , 2005 .

[2]  P. Brugada,et al.  Value of lead V4R for recognition of the infarct coronary artery in acute inferior myocardial infarction. , 1984, The American journal of cardiology.

[3]  J. Copeland,et al.  One heart, two bodies: insight from the transplanted heart and its new electrocardiogram. , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.

[4]  S. Carley,et al.  Beyond the 12 lead: review of the use of additional leads for the early electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. , 2003, Emergency medicine.

[5]  P M Rautaharju,et al.  Identification of best electrocardiographic leads for diagnosing myocardial infarction by statistical analysis of body surface potential maps. , 1985, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  Michelle Jenkins,et al.  Body surface mapping versus the standard 12 lead ECG in the detection of myocardial infarction amongst emergency department patients: a Bayesian approach. , 2005, Resuscitation.

[7]  R L Winslow,et al.  Direct histological validation of diffusion tensor MRI in formaldehyde‐fixed myocardium , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  I.B.A Menown,et al.  Body-surface map models for early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. , 1998 .

[9]  D. H. Campen,et al.  Optimization of Cardiac Fiber Orientation for Homogeneous Fiber Strain During Ejection , 1999, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  R. Gulrajani The forward and inverse problems of electrocardiography. , 1998, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[11]  B. He,et al.  Effects of cardiac anisotropy on three-dimensional ECG localization inverse solutions: a model study , 2005 .

[12]  F. Roberge,et al.  Moving Dipole Inverse ECG and EEG Solutions , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[13]  J. Perloff The Recognition of Strictly Posterior Myocardial Infarction by Conventional Scalar Electrocardiography , 1964, Circulation.

[14]  K. Ikeda,et al.  Effects of lung volume on body surface electrocardiogram. Isointegral analysis of body surface maps in patients with chronic pulmonary emphysema. , 1985, Japanese circulation journal.

[15]  Pierre L. Page,et al.  Clinical applications of BSM. , 1995, Journal of electrocardiology.

[16]  Gian Luca Romani,et al.  Magnetocardiography: current status and perspectives. Part I: Physical principles and instrumentation. , 2002, Italian heart journal : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology.

[17]  D Freimark,et al.  Acute myocardial infarction with isolated ST-segment elevation in posterior chest leads V7-9: "hidden" ST-segment elevations revealing acute posterior infarction. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  I. Menown,et al.  ST depression only on the initial 12-lead ECG: early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. , 2001, European heart journal.

[19]  P M Rautaharju,et al.  Identification of best electrocardiographic leads for diagnosing left ventricular hypertrophy by statistical analysis of body surface potential maps. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  Charles Antzelevitch Brugada syndrome. , 2006, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[21]  C W Haws,et al.  Detection and localization of coronary artery disease with body surface mapping in patients with normal electrocardiograms. , 1987, Circulation.

[22]  Y. Rudy,et al.  Electrocardiographic Imaging: I. Effect of Torso Inhomogeneities on Body Surface Electrocardiographic Potentials , 2001, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[23]  S. Stewart,et al.  Prediction of right ventricular and posterior wall ST elevation by coronary care nurses: the 12-lead electrocardiograph versus the 18-lead electrocardiograph. , 1996, Heart & lung : the journal of critical care.

[24]  A. Mattu,et al.  Prominent R wave in lead V1: electrocardiographic differential diagnosis. , 2001, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[25]  R. Barr,et al.  The Forward and Inverse Problems: What Are They, Why Are They Important, and Where Do We Stand? , 2001, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[26]  H. Bruder,et al.  The influence of inhomogeneous volume conductor models on the ECG and the MCG. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[27]  A. Waller On the Electromotive Changes Connected with the Beat of the Mammalian Heart, and of the Human Heart in Particular , 1889 .

[28]  Simon J Walsh,et al.  Prehospital 80-LAD mapping: does it add significantly to the diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes? , 2004, Journal of electrocardiology.

[29]  H. Hänninen Multichannel magnetocardiography and body surface potential mapping in exercise-induced myocardial ischemia , 2002 .

[30]  C. Bradley,et al.  Effects of Material Properties and Geometry on Electrocardiographic Forward Simulations , 2000, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[31]  I. Menown,et al.  Comparison of the 80-lead body surface map to physician and to 12-lead electrocardiogram in detection of acute myocardial infarction. , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.

[32]  J. D. Munck,et al.  The electric resistivity of human tissues (100 Hz-10 MHz): a meta-analysis of review studies. , 1999, Physiological measurement.

[33]  C. Petitjean,et al.  Assessment of myocardial function: a review of quantification methods and results using tagged MRI. , 2005, Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[34]  E. Frank An Accurate, Clinically Practical System For Spatial Vectorcardiography , 1956, Circulation.

[35]  R. Lux,et al.  Effect of Myocardial Fiber Direction on Epicardial Potentials , 1994, Circulation.

[36]  R. Macleod,et al.  Useful Lessons from Body Surface Mapping , 1998, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[37]  A. van Oosterom,et al.  Heart position and orientation in forward and inverse electrocardiography , 1992, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[38]  Robert Plonsey,et al.  Bioelectromagnetism: Principles and Applications of Bioelectric and Biomagnetic Fields , 1995 .

[39]  David M. Mirvis,et al.  Body Surface Electrocardiographic Mapping , 2012, Developments in Cardiovascular Medicine.

[40]  J. .. Abildskov,et al.  Clinical applications of body surface potential mapping , 1995, Clinical cardiology.

[41]  David B. Geselowitz,et al.  Use of electric and magnetic data to obtain a multiple dipole inverse cardiac generator: A spherical model study , 1974, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[42]  P M Rautaharju,et al.  Identification of best electrocardiographic leads for diagnosing anterior and inferior myocardial infarction by statistical analysis of body surface potential maps. , 1986, The American journal of cardiology.

[43]  Rob S. MacLeod,et al.  An Admissible Solution Approach to Inverse Electrocardiography , 1998, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[44]  D. Hill,et al.  Three- and four-dimensional reconstruction of intra-cardiac anatomy from two-dimensional magnetic resonance images , 2003, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[45]  C. Tracy,et al.  ACC/AHA clinical competence statement on electrocardiography and ambulatory electrocardiography. A report of the ACC/AHA/ACP-ASIM Task Force on Clinical Competence (ACC/AHA Committee to Develop a Clinical Competence Statement on Electrocardiography and Ambulatory Electrocardiography). , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[46]  I. Menown,et al.  Body surface mapping improves early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with chest pain and left bundle branch block , 2003, Heart.

[47]  C.R. Johnson,et al.  The effects of inhomogeneities and anisotropies on electrocardiographic fields: a 3-D finite-element study , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[48]  G. Schwartz,et al.  Cardiac torsion and electromagnetic fields: the cardiac bioinformation hypothesis. , 2005, Medical hypotheses.

[49]  Xin Zhang,et al.  Noninvasive imaging of cardiac transmembrane potentials within three-dimensional myocardium by means of a realistic geometry anisotropic heart model , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[50]  Mirza Faisal Beg,et al.  Measuring and Mapping Cardiac Fiber and Laminar Architecture Using Diffusion Tensor MR Imaging , 2005, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[51]  Yoram Rudy,et al.  Conduction Abnormalities and Ventricular Hypertrophy , 1998 .

[52]  K. Ikeda,et al.  Body surface mapping of high-frequency components in the terminal portion during QRS complex for the prediction of ventricular tachycardia in patients with previous myocardial infarction. , 1990, Circulation.

[53]  Pierre L. Page,et al.  Body surface isopotential mapping of the entire QRST complex in the Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. Correlation with the location of the accessory pathway. , 1991, American heart journal.

[54]  D. Freimark,et al.  Acute myocardial infarction with isolated ST-segment elevation in posterior chest leads: V7–9 , 1998 .