Teacher design knowledge for technology enhanced learning: a framework for investigating assets and needs

Design of (technology-enhanced) learning activities and materials is one fruitful process through which teachers learn and become professionals. To facilitate this process, research is needed to understand how teachers learn through design, how this process may be supported, and how teacher involvement in design partnerships with researchers impacts the quality of the artifacts created, their implementation, and ultimately, student learning. This session speaks to that need by bringing together diverse researchers who, together with practitioners, have explored various affordances of (technology-enhanced learning) design activities for facilitating teaching, learning, curriculum innovation and teacher professional development.

[1]  Stephen T. Kerr.  Inside the Black Box: Making Design Decisions for Instruction. , 1983 .

[2]  John D. Bransford,et al.  Adaptive People and Adaptive Systems: Issues of Learning and Design , 2010 .

[3]  Charles M. Eastman,et al.  New Directions in Design Cognition: Studies of Representation and Recall , 2001 .

[4]  L. Reder,et al.  Metacognition does not imply awareness: Strategy choice is governed by implicit learning and memory , 1996 .

[5]  Peter Sloep,et al.  How Expert Designers Design , 2008 .

[6]  Yael Kali,et al.  Researching design practices and design cognition: contexts, experiences and pedagogical knowledge‐in‐pieces , 2011 .

[7]  J. Kessels,et al.  A relational approach to curriculum design , 1999 .

[8]  Charoula Angeli,et al.  Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[9]  James A. Drake.  The Educational Imagination. , 1979 .

[10]  Matthew M. Mehalik,et al.  What Constitutes Good Design? A Review of Empirical Studies of Design Processes* , 2006 .

[11]  Tim Brown,et al.  Design Thinking for Social Innovation , 2010 .

[12]  Joke Voogt,et al.  Teacher roles in designing technology-rich learning activities for early literacy: A cross-case analysis , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[13]  Per-Anders Hillgren,et al.  Participatory design and "democratizing innovation" , 2010, PDC '10.

[14]  Janine T. Remillard,et al.  The teacher-tool relationship: Theorizing the design and use of curriculum materials , 2009 .

[15]  “Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge” , 1979 .

[16]  Robert M. Gagné,et al.  The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction , 1985 .

[17]  Els Kuiper,et al.  Concept-guided development of ICT use in 'traditional' and 'innovative' primary schools: what types of ICT use do schools develop? , 2012, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[18]  Gijsbert Erkens,et al.  Shared Epistemic Agency: An Empirical Study of an Emergent Construct , 2010 .

[19]  Shawn Y. Stevens,et al.  Understanding Pedagogical Design Capacity through Teachers' Narratives. , 2011 .

[20]  Hyeon-Suk Kang.  Preliminary Development of Knowledge Base of Curriculum as a Field of Study , 2008 .

[21]  Stephen T. Kerr.  How teachers design their materials: Implications for instructional design , 1981 .

[22]  Yael Kali,et al.  Helping Education Students Understand Learning through Designing. , 2008 .

[23]  Claudio U. Ciborra,et al.  From tool to: Agendas for managing the information infrastructure , 1998, Inf. Technol. People.

[24]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  Thinking in design teams - an analysis of team communication , 2002 .

[25]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  On the benefits and pitfalls of analogies for innovative design : Ideation performance based on analogical distance, commonness, and modality of examples , 2011 .

[26]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Cognitive load theory: implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning , 2002 .

[27]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Design Thinking: Understanding How Designers Think and Work , 2011 .

[28]  Peter Goodyear,et al.  Tapping into the mental resources of teachers' working knowledge: Insights into the generative power of intuitive pedagogy , 2014 .

[29]  A. Royalty,et al.  Destination, Imagination and the Fires Within: Design Thinking in a Middle School Classroom , 2010 .

[30]  Susan McKenney,et al.  Design research from a curriculum perspective , 2006 .

[31]  T. Ingold.  Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture , 2013 .

[32]  Erik Stolterman,et al.  The Design Way: Intentional Change in an Unpredictable World , 2002 .

[33]  Alan H. Schoenfeld,et al.  How We Think : A Theory of Goal-Oriented Decision Making and its Educational Applications , 2010 .

[34]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[35]  Yael Kali,et al.  Bridging Multiple Expertise in Collaborative Design for Technology-Enhanced Learning , 2011 .

[36]  J. Voogt,et al.  Teacher Learning in Collaborative Curriculum Design. , 2011 .

[37]  Gordon Rowland,et al.  What Do Instructional Designers Actually Do? An Initial Investigation of Expert Practice. , 2008 .

[38]  Christopher A. Le Dantec,et al.  Infrastructuring and the formation of publics in participatory design , 2013 .

[39]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  Modality and representation in analogy , 2008, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing.

[40]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  INCREASING INNOVATION: PRESENTATION AND EVALUATION OF THE WORDTREE DESIGN- BY-ANALOGY METHOD , 2008 .

[41]  James O. Carey,et al.  The systematic design of instruction , 1978 .

[42]  Jeff Shrager,et al.  SCADS: A Model of Children's Strategy Choices and Strategy Discoveries , 1998 .

[43]  Fred Paas,et al.  The effects of a Web-based training in an instructional systems design approach on teachers' instructional design behavior , 2001, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[44]  Peter Goodyear,et al.  Educational design and networked learning: Patterns, pattern languages and design practice , 2005 .

[45]  Judi Harris,et al.  Instructional Planning Activity Types as Vehicles for Curriculum-Based TPACK Development , 2009 .

[46]  Katerine Bielaczyc,et al.  Informing Design Research: Learning From Teachers' Designs of Social Infrastructure , 2013 .

[47]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution , 2001 .

[48]  Eugene G. Kowch.  Ten steps to complex learning: A systematic approach to four-component Instructional Design. 2007. Jeroen J. G.. van Merriënboer & Paul Kirschner. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. 306 pages. ISBN: 9780805857931 , 2008 .

[49]  Simon Walker,et al.  Capturing teachers’ experience of learning design through case studies , 2009 .

[50]  Yael Kali,et al.  Teaching to design educational technologies , 2011, Int. J. Learn. Technol..

[51]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[52]  Isabelle Girault,et al.  Approaches to learning design: past the head and the hands to the HEART of the matter , 2009 .

[53]  Donald A. Stepich,et al.  How instructional design experts use knowledge and experience to solve ill‐structured problems , 2008 .

[54]  P. Ehn,et al.  Agonistic participatory design: working with marginalised social movements , 2012 .

[55]  D. Walker.  A Naturalistic Model for Curriculum Development , 1971, The School Review.

[56]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  The teacher as action researcher: using technology to capture pedagogic form , 2008 .

[57]  Kent L. Gustafson,et al.  Paradigms in the theory and practice of education and training design , 2004 .

[58]  Susan McKenney,et al.  Designing and researching technology-enhanced learning for the zone of proximal implementation , 2013 .

[59]  Deborah G. Tatar,et al.  Conceptual tools for planning for the wireless classroom , 2003, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[60]  Peggy A. Ertmer.  Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? , 2005 .

[61]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implica-tions , 1999 .

[62]  Ilana Seidel Horn,et al.  Teaching Replays, Teaching Rehearsals, and Re-Visions of Practice: Learning from Colleagues in a Mathematics Teacher Community , 2010, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[63]  Peter Goodyear,et al.  Learning, Technology and Design , 2010 .

[64]  Alejandra Martínez-Monés,et al.  Recurrent routines: Analyzing and supporting orchestration in technology-enhanced primary classrooms , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[65]  Gerald Knezek,et al.  Construct Validity for the Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Computers Questionnaire , 2009 .

[66]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[67]  J. Voogt,et al.  Teacher involvement in curriculum design: need for support to enhance teachers’ design expertise , 2014 .

[68]  Abbie Brown,et al.  Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in c , 1992 .

[69]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .

[70]  Johan van Braak,et al.  Technological pedagogical content knowledge - a review of the literature , 2013, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[71]  R. Ellis,et al.  Teacher conceptions of blended learning, blended teaching and associations with approaches to design , 2006 .

[72]  Monica Martinez.  The Learning Economy , 2010 .

[73]  Hugh Burkhardt,et al.  On Strategic Design , 2009 .

[74]  V. Shute,et al.  What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important? , 2012 .

[75]  Adam Handelzalts,et al.  Collaborative curriculum development in teacher design teams , 2009 .

[76]  Joke Voogt,et al.  Understanding decision making in teachers’ curriculum design approaches , 2014, Educational Technology Research and Development.

[77]  Ralph T. Putnam,et al.  What Do New Views of Knowledge and Thinking Have to Say About Research on Teacher Learning? , 2000 .

[78]  Donald A. Schön.  Educating the Reflective Practitioner: Toward a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions , 1987 .

[79]  Donald A. Stepich,et al.  Impact of guidance on the problem-solving efforts of instructional design novices , 2009 .

[80]  R. Keith Sawyer,et al.  Educating for innovation , 2006 .

[81]  Peter Goodyear,et al.  Patterns, designs and activities: unifying descriptions of learning structures , 2006, Int. J. Learn. Technol..

[82]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  The role of timing and analogical similarity in the stimulation of idea generation in design , 2008 .

[83]  E. Eisner.  Educational Connoisseurship and Criticism: Their Form and Functions in Educational Evaluation , 1976 .

[84]  Ben Jonson,et al.  Design ideation: the conceptual sketch in the digital age , 2005 .

[85]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  What Happens When Teachers Design Educational Technology? The Development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge , 2005 .

[86]  Joke Voogt,et al.  Exploring teachers' use of TPACK in design talk: The collaborative design of technology-rich early literacy activities , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[87]  Christoph Meinel,et al.  Design Thinking: Understand - Improve - Apply , 2010 .

[88]  Yael Kali,et al.  Assimilating Online Technologies into School Culture , 2009 .

[89]  Daniel L. Schwartz,et al.  Intercultural Adaptive Expertise: Explicit and Implicit Lessons from Dr. Hatano , 2007, Human Development.

[90]  Kevin Otto,et al.  Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development , 2000 .

[91]  Fred Paas,et al.  Training higher education teachers for instructional design of competency-based education : Product-oriented versus process-oriented worked examples , 2005 .

[92]  Nigel Cross,et al.  Design cognition: results from protocol and other empirical studies of design activity , 2016 .

[93]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Ten Steps to Complex Learning: A Systematic Approach to Four-Component Instructional Design , 2007 .

[94]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Infrastructuring: Toward an Integrated Perspective on the Design and Use of Information Technology , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[95]  Theodore J. Kopcha,et al.  Instructional Design Models , 2014 .

[96]  Qiyun Wang,et al.  Designing a computer support system for multimedia curriculum development in Shanghai , 2007 .

[97]  J. Brown,et al.  Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing , 1999, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[98]  George J. Posner,et al.  Course Design: A Guide to Curriculum Development for Teachers , 1982 .

[99]  Charles M. Eastman,et al.  Cognitive processes and ill-defined problems: a case study from design , 1969, IJCAI 1969.

[100]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Faculty Development by Design: Integrating Technology in Higher Education , 2006 .

[101]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[102]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .