Brains, Gases and Robots

Over the past decade there has been renewed interest within AI in building simple autonomous ’creatures’ as a way of investigating mechanisms underlying the generation of adaptive behaviour [4, 1]. The vast majority of researchers in this field use some form of artificial neural network (ANN) as the basis of the ’nervous system’ of their agents. These networks can be envisaged as simple nodes connected together by directional wires along which signals flow. As has been pointed out by various people (e.g. [3]), advances in neuroscience have made it clear that the propagation of action potentials, and the changing of synaptic connection strengths, is only a very small part of the story of the brain (e.g [17]). This in turn means that connectionist style networks, and even recurrent dynamical ones, are generally very different kinds of systems from those that generate sophisticated adaptive behaviours in animals. Although our picture of biological neuronal networks changes every few years, contemporary neuroscience can provide a rich source of inspiration in devising alternative styles of artificial network [2].

[1]  R. A. Brooks,et al.  Intelligence without Representation , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[2]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  Challenges for complete creature architectures , 1991 .

[3]  D. Cliff From animals to animats 3 : proceedings of the Third International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior , 1994 .

[4]  Stefano Nolfi,et al.  How to Evolve Autonomous Robots: Different Approaches in Evolutionary Robotics , 1994 .

[5]  John H. Holland,et al.  Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: An Introductory Analysis with Applications to Biology, Control, and Artificial Intelligence , 1992 .

[6]  Inman Harvey,et al.  Seeing the Light: Artiicial Evolution, Real Vision Seeing the Light: Artiicial Evolution, Real Vision , 1994 .

[7]  J. Garthwaite Glutamate, nitric oxide and cell-cell signalling in the nervous system , 1991, Trends in Neurosciences.

[8]  Inman Harvey,et al.  Explorations in Evolutionary Robotics , 1993, Adapt. Behav..

[9]  Nick Jakobi,et al.  Evolutionary Robotics and the Radical Envelope-of-Noise Hypothesis , 1997, Adapt. Behav..

[10]  Rodney A. Brooks,et al.  Coherent behavior from many adaptive processes , 1994 .

[11]  Nick Jakobi,et al.  Minimal simulations for evolutionary robotics , 1998 .

[12]  R. Beer,et al.  Intelligence as Adaptive Behavior: An Experiment in Computational Neuroethology , 1990 .

[13]  Phil Husbands,et al.  Evolving Robot Behaviours with Diffusing Gas Networks , 1998, EvoRobot.

[14]  P. Husbands,et al.  Neural Signalling: It’s a Gas! , 1998 .

[15]  G. Edelman,et al.  The NO hypothesis: possible effects of a short-lived, rapidly diffusible signal in the development and function of the nervous system. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  David R. Jefferson,et al.  Selection in Massively Parallel Genetic Algorithms , 1991, ICGA.