The size and range effect: lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions of electric vehicles

The primary goal of this study is to investigate the effect of increasing battery size and driving range to the environmental impact of electric vehicles (EVs). To this end, we compile cradle-to-grave inventories for EVs in four size segments to determine their climate change potential. A second objective is to compare the lifecycle emissions of EVs to those of conventional vehicles. For this purpose, we collect lifecycle emissions for conventional vehicles reported by automobile manufacturers. The lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions are calculated per vehicle and over a total driving range of 180 000 km using the average European electricity mix. Process-based attributional LCA and the ReCiPe characterisation method are used to estimate the climate change potential from the hierarchical perspective. The differently sized EVs are compared to one another to find the effect of increasing the size and range of EVs. We also point out the sources of differences in lifecycle emissions between conventional- and electric vehicles. Furthermore, a sensitivity analysis assesses the change in lifecycle emissions when electricity with various energy sources power the EVs. The sensitivity analysis also examines how the use phase electricity sources influences the size and range effect.

[1]  Richard Wood,et al.  When Do Allocations and Constructs Respect Material, Energy, Financial, and Production Balances in LCA and EEIO? , 2016 .

[2]  Stefan Pauliuk,et al.  Global carbon benefits of material substitution in passenger cars until 2050 and the impact on the steel and aluminum industries. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  C. Yuan,et al.  Life cycle environmental impact of high-capacity lithium ion battery with silicon nanowires anode for electric vehicles. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  Lars Ole Valøen,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of a Lithium‐Ion Battery Vehicle Pack , 2014 .

[5]  Hyung Chul Kim,et al.  Life-cycle energy and greenhouse gas emission benefits of lightweighting in automobiles: review and harmonization. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Troy R. Hawkins,et al.  Comparative Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional and Electric Vehicles , 2013 .

[7]  Michael Q. Wang,et al.  Impact of recycling on cradle-to-gate energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of automotive lithium-ion batteries. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Anibal T. de Almeida,et al.  A sustainability assessment of electric vehicles as a personal mobility system , 2012 .

[9]  Troy R. Hawkins,et al.  Life cycle environmental assessment of lithium-ion and nickel metal hydride batteries for plug-in hybrid and battery electric vehicles. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[10]  M. Zackrisson,et al.  Life cycle assessment of lithium-ion batteries for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles – Critical issues , 2010 .

[11]  J. Apt,et al.  Lithium-ion battery cell degradation resulting from realistic vehicle and vehicle-to-grid utilization , 2010 .

[12]  J. Dewulf,et al.  Recycling rechargeable lithium ion batteries: Critical analysis of natural resource savings , 2010 .

[13]  Kevin G. Gallagher,et al.  The significance of Li-ion batteries in electric vehicle life-cycle energy and emissions and recycling's role in its reduction , 2015 .

[14]  O. Edenhofer,et al.  Climate change 2014 : mitigation of climate change , 2014 .

[15]  D. O M I N I,et al.  Contribution of Li-Ion Batteries to the Environmental Impact of Electric Vehicles , 2010 .