Bang-bang impact control using hybrid impedance/time-delay control

For stabilization of a robot manipulator upon collision with a stiff environment, a nonlinear bang-bang impact controller is developed. Under this control, a robot can successfully achieve contact tasks without changing the control algorithm or controller gains throughout all three modes: free space, transition and constrained motion. It uses a robust hybrid impedance/time-delay control algorithm to first absorb impact forces and stabilize the system. This control input alternates with zero when no environment force is sensed due to loss of contact. This alternation of control action repeats until the impact transient subsides and steady state is attained. After impact transient, the hybrid impedance/time-delay control algorithm is again utilized. This bang-bang control method provides stable interaction between a robot with severe nonlinear joint friction and a stiff environment, and achieves rapid response while minimizing force overshoots. During contact transition, we employ one simple control algorithm that switches only to zero and maintains the same gains, while other controllers use more than one control algorithm or different control gains. It is shown via experiments that overall performance is superior or comparable to more complicated existing impact force control techniques.

[1]  W. S. Newman,et al.  Stability and Performance Limits of Interaction Controllers , 1992 .

[2]  T.A. Lasky,et al.  Robust independent robot joint control: design and experimentation , 1988, Proceedings. 1988 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[3]  Neville Hogan,et al.  Stable execution of contact tasks using impedance control , 1987, Proceedings. 1987 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[4]  Cheryl Schrader,et al.  Hybrid impedance/time-delay control from free space to constrained motion , 2003, Proceedings of the 2003 American Control Conference, 2003..

[5]  Kamal Youcef-Toumi,et al.  Application of decentralized time-delay controller to robot manipulators , 1989, Proceedings, 1989 International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[6]  J. Edward Colgate The control of dynamically interacting systems , 1988 .

[7]  Roger D. Quinn,et al.  A nonlinear bang-bang impact force control , 1996, Proceedings of 35th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[8]  Pyung Hun Chang,et al.  A model reference observer for time-delay control and its application to robot trajectory control , 1994, IEEE Trans. Control. Syst. Technol..

[9]  Mark R. Cutkosky,et al.  Contact transition control: an experimental study , 1993, [1993] Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[10]  Pyung Hun Chang,et al.  Impact when robots act wisely , 2003, 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.03CH37422).

[11]  Tzyh Jong Tarn,et al.  An event based approach to impact control: theory and experiments , 1994, Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[12]  Eunjeong Lee Force and impact control for robot manipulators with unknown dynamics and disturbances , 1994 .

[13]  Kamal Youcef-Toumi,et al.  Impact and force control , 1989, Proceedings, 1989 International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[14]  Kamal Youcef-Toumi,et al.  A Time Delay Controller for Systems with Unknown Dynamics , 1988, 1988 American Control Conference.

[15]  Kamal Youcef-Toumi,et al.  Impact and Force Control: Modeling and Experiments , 1994 .

[16]  Biao Yu,et al.  Modeling, control design and mechatronic implementation of constrained robots for surface finishing applications , 2000 .

[17]  Liang-Boon Wee,et al.  On the dynamics of contact between space robots and configuration control for impact minimization , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[18]  Masaaki Shibata,et al.  Impact force reduction for biped robot based on decoupling COG control scheme , 2000, 6th International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control. Proceedings (Cat. No.00TH8494).

[19]  John M. Hollerbach,et al.  Force and contact transient control using nonlinear PD control , 1994, Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[20]  Shigeru Okuma,et al.  Contact Force Control Based on Learning Operation without Switching the Servo Mode at the Instant of the Impact. , 1996 .

[21]  Antonio Tornambè,et al.  Impact model and control of two multi-DOF cooperating manipulators , 1999, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[22]  Richard Volpe,et al.  A theoretical and experimental investigation of explicit force control strategies for manipulators , 1993, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[23]  Oussama Khatib,et al.  Motion and force control of robot manipulators , 1986, Proceedings. 1986 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[24]  Gábor Stépán,et al.  Vibrations of machines subjected to digital force control , 2001 .

[25]  Pradeep K. Khosla,et al.  A Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of Impact Control for Manipulators , 1993, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[26]  Pradeep K. Khosla,et al.  An Experimental Evaluation and Comparison of Explicit Force Control Strategies for Robotic Manipulators , 1992, 1992 American Control Conference.

[27]  Joris De Schutter,et al.  Introducing active linear and nonlinear damping to enable stable high gain force control in case of stiff contact , 1992, Proceedings 1992 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[28]  Tzyh Jong Tarn,et al.  Stable phase transition control for robot arm motion , 1993, [1993] Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[29]  I. D. Walker,et al.  Sensitivity to parametric uncertainty in robot impact , 2001, 2001 IEEE/ASME International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics. Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8556).