Finding core for coalition structure utilizing dual solution

When forming the grand coalition is not possible or optimal, agents need to create a coalition structure. The idea of the core can be extended to such a case. In this paper, we propose an innovative exact algorithm called CoreD to check core-non-emptiness for coalition structures. A more straightforward exact algorithm based on existing techniques, which we call CoreP, first obtains the value of optimal coalition structure by solving an integer programming problem. Then, it checks whether that value can be divided without making a blocking (dissatisfied) coalition. In contrast, CoreD first finds a minimal value of the optimal coalition structure so that there exists no blocking coalition. Next, it checks whether the optimal value equals the minimal value We empirically show that when the core is empty, CoreD is by far superior to CoreP. Also, to find a second-best payoff vector when the core is empty, we propose a new solution concept called the weak e-core+, which can utilize the approximate value of the optimal coalition structure. Based on the idea of CoreD, we further develop an algorithm for checking the non-emptiness of the weak e-core+.

[1]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Bidding and allocation in combinatorial auctions , 2000, EC '00.

[2]  Makoto Yokoo,et al.  Finding the Core for Coalition Structure Utilizing Dual Solution , 2013, 2013 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT).

[3]  Sarvapali D. Ramchurn,et al.  Coalition formation with spatial and temporal constraints , 2010, AAMAS.

[4]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Minimum Search to Establish Worst-Case Guarantees in Coalition Structure Generation , 2011, IJCAI.

[5]  Yoav Shoham,et al.  Combinatorial Auctions , 2005, Encyclopedia of Wireless Networks.

[6]  Morteza Zadimoghaddam,et al.  Optimal Coalition Structure Generation in Cooperative Graph Games , 2013, AAAI.

[7]  Israel Zang,et al.  The Limits of Monopolization Through Acquisition , 1990 .

[8]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Computational Aspects of Cooperative Game Theory (Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Inetlligence and Machine Learning) , 2011 .

[9]  H. Young,et al.  Cost allocation in water resources development , 1982 .

[10]  Michael Wooldridge,et al.  Computational Aspects of Cooperative Game Theory , 2011, KES-AMSTA.

[11]  L. Shapley A Value for n-person Games , 1988 .

[12]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  Coalition Structure Generation over Graphs , 2012, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[13]  Yoav Shoham,et al.  Towards a universal test suite for combinatorial auction algorithms , 2000, EC '00.

[14]  Vincent Conitzer,et al.  A Compact Representation Scheme for Coalitional Games in Open Anonymous Environments , 2006, AAAI.

[15]  N. Jennings,et al.  Computational Coalition Formation , 2013 .

[16]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  An improved dynamic programming algorithm for coalition structure generation , 2008, AAMAS.

[17]  Sarit Kraus,et al.  Methods for Task Allocation via Agent Coalition Formation , 1998, Artif. Intell..

[18]  Tuomas Sandholm,et al.  Algorithm for optimal winner determination in combinatorial auctions , 2002, Artif. Intell..

[19]  D. Schmeidler The Nucleolus of a Characteristic Function Game , 1969 .

[20]  Jörg Rothe,et al.  The Cost of Stability in Coalitional Games , 2009, SAGT.

[21]  Piotr Faliszewski,et al.  Constrained Coalition Formation , 2011, AAAI.

[22]  Tri-Dung Nguyen,et al.  A fast approximation algorithm for solving the complete set packing problem , 2014, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  A Hybrid Algorithm for Coalition Structure Generation , 2012, AAAI.

[24]  R. J. Aumann,et al.  Cooperative games with coalition structures , 1974 .

[25]  Morton D. Davis,et al.  The kernel of a cooperative game , 1965 .

[26]  L. Shapley,et al.  QUASI-CORES IN A MONETARY ECONOMY WITH NONCONVEX PREFERENCES , 1966 .

[27]  Luigi Palopoli,et al.  On the Complexity of the Core over Coalition Structures , 2011, IJCAI.

[28]  Yoav Shoham,et al.  Marginal contribution nets: a compact representation scheme for coalitional games , 2005, EC '05.

[29]  Ariel Rubinstein,et al.  A Course in Game Theory , 1995 .

[30]  Jeffrey S. Rosenschein,et al.  Subsidies, Stability, and Restricted Cooperation in Coalitional Games , 2011, IJCAI.

[31]  Kyomin Jung,et al.  Coalitional Structure Generation in Skill Games , 2010, AAAI.

[32]  J. Pérez-Castrillo,et al.  Cooperative Outcomes through Noncooperative Games , 1994 .

[33]  Sarvapali D. Ramchurn,et al.  An Anytime Algorithm for Optimal Coalition Structure Generation , 2014, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[34]  L. S. Shapley,et al.  Geometric Properties of the Kernel, Nucleolus, and Related Solution Concepts , 1979, Math. Oper. Res..

[35]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  A distributed algorithm for anytime coalition structure generation , 2010, AAMAS.

[36]  Sandip Sen,et al.  On the stability of an Optimal Coalition Structure , 2010, ECAI.

[37]  Onn Shehory,et al.  Coalition structure generation with worst case guarantees , 2022 .

[38]  Luigi Palopoli,et al.  On the complexity of core, kernel, and bargaining set , 2008, Artif. Intell..

[39]  Haris Aziz,et al.  Complexity of coalition structure generation , 2011, AAMAS.

[40]  Nicholas R. Jennings,et al.  An algorithm for distributing coalitional value calculations among cooperating agents , 2007, Artif. Intell..

[41]  Vincent Conitzer,et al.  Coalition Structure Generation Utilizing Compact Characteristic Function Representations , 2009, CP.

[42]  Vincent Conitzer,et al.  Complexity of constructing solutions in the core based on synergies among coalitions , 2006, Artif. Intell..

[43]  Gabrielle Demange,et al.  The strategy structure of some coalition formation games , 2009, Games Econ. Behav..