Variation in female songbird state determines signal strength needed to evoke copulation

It is the female response to male signals that determines courtship success. In most songbirds, females control reproduction via the copulation solicitation display (CSD), an innate, stereotyped posture produced in direct response to male displays. Because CSD can be elicited in the absence of males by the presentation of recorded song, CSD production enables investigations into the effects of underlying signal features and behavioral state on female mating preferences. Using computer vision to quantify CSD trajectory in female brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater), we show that both song quality and a female’s internal state predict CSD production, as well as the onset latency and duration of the display. We also show that CSD can be produced in a graded fashion based on both signal strength and internal state. These results emphasize the importance of underlying receiver state in determining behavioral responses and suggest that female responsiveness acts in conjunction with male signal strength to determine the efficacy of male courtship.

[1]  Dayu Lin,et al.  Neural circuits of social behaviors: Innate yet flexible , 2021, Neuron.

[2]  Marc F. Schmidt,et al.  Female signal jamming in a socially monogamous brood parasite , 2021, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  G. Ball,et al.  Sex differences and similarities in the neural circuit regulating song and other reproductive behaviors in songbirds , 2020, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[4]  Joel Nothman,et al.  Author Correction: SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python , 2020, Nature Methods.

[5]  Johannes L. Schönberger,et al.  SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python , 2019, Nature Methods.

[6]  T. Branco,et al.  Cognitive Control of Escape Behaviour , 2019, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  M. Goldstein,et al.  Female Social Feedback Reveals Non-imitative Mechanisms of Vocal Learning in Zebra Finches , 2019, Current Biology.

[8]  Eshin Jolly,et al.  Pymer4: Connecting R and Python for Linear Mixed Modeling , 2018, J. Open Source Softw..

[9]  T. Branco,et al.  A synaptic threshold mechanism for computing escape decisions , 2018, Nature.

[10]  Marc F. Schmidt,et al.  Female Songbirds: The unsung drivers of courtship behavior and its neural substrates , 2017, Behavioural Processes.

[11]  Jing W. Wang,et al.  Neuromodulation of Innate Behaviors in Drosophila. , 2017, Annual review of neuroscience.

[12]  J. Lucas,et al.  What makes a multimodal signal attractive? A preference function approach , 2017 .

[13]  David J. Anderson,et al.  Toward a Science of Computational Ethology , 2014, Neuron.

[14]  Pietro Perona,et al.  Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context , 2014, ECCV.

[15]  William Bialek,et al.  Mapping the stereotyped behaviour of freely moving fruit flies , 2013, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[16]  Marc F. Schmidt,et al.  Social Brains in Context: Lesions Targeted to the Song Control System in Female Cowbirds Affect Their Social Network , 2013, PloS one.

[17]  R. Suthers,et al.  Bilateral coordination and the motor basis of female preference for sexual signals in canary song , 2012, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[18]  L. Remage-Healey,et al.  Sex-specific, rapid neuroestrogen fluctuations and neurophysiological actions in the songbird auditory forebrain. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  J. Podos,et al.  A Tradeoff Between Performance and Accuracy in Bird Song Learning , 2011 .

[20]  R. Pinaud,et al.  Estradiol-dependent modulation of auditory processing and selectivity in songbirds , 2011, Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology.

[21]  Edwin Olson,et al.  AprilTag: A robust and flexible visual fiducial system , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[22]  Dezhe Z. Jin,et al.  Support for a synaptic chain model of neuronal sequence generation , 2010, Nature.

[23]  C. Catchpole,et al.  Sexual differences in the responses of captive great reed warblers (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) to variation in song structure and repertoire size , 2010 .

[24]  A. King,et al.  Social Guidance of Vocal Learning by Female Cowbirds: Validating its Functional Significance , 2010 .

[25]  A. King,et al.  Female Cowbird Song Perception: Evidence for Different Developmental Programs within the same Subspecies , 2010 .

[26]  W M Schleidt,et al.  How "fixed" is the fixed action pattern? , 2010, Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie.

[27]  D. White,et al.  The ontogeny of social skills: experimental increases in social complexity enhance reproductive success in adult cowbirds , 2010, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  P. Domenici,et al.  Preparing for escape: anti-predator posture and fast-start performance in gobies , 2009, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[29]  M. C. Moore Effect of female sexual displays on the endocrine physiology and behaviour of male white‐crowned sparrows, Zonotrichia leucophrys , 2009 .

[30]  D. Pfaff,et al.  Reverse engineering the lordosis behavior circuit , 2008, Hormones and Behavior.

[31]  J. Sakata,et al.  Social modulation of sequence and syllable variability in adult birdsong. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  Toshikazu Hasegawa,et al.  Peahens do not prefer peacocks with more elaborate trains , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[33]  J. Hranitz,et al.  Behavioral attributes influence annual mating success more than morphological traits in male collared lizards , 2007 .

[34]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  Context Familiarity Enhances Target Processing by Inferior Temporal Cortex Neurons , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  J. Gold,et al.  The neural basis of decision making. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[36]  Julie Gros-Louis,et al.  A method to measure the development of song preferences in female cowbirds, Molothrus ater , 2006, Animal Behaviour.

[37]  Michael J. Ryan,et al.  Hormonal state influences aspects of female mate choice in the Túngara Frog (Physalaemus pustulosus) , 2006, Hormones and Behavior.

[38]  D. Maney,et al.  Estrogen‐dependent selectivity of genomic responses to birdsong , 2006, The European journal of neuroscience.

[39]  Christopher M. Glaze,et al.  Temporal Structure in Zebra Finch Song: Implications for Motor Coding , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  Steven M Phelps,et al.  A Cognitive Framework for Mate Choice and Species Recognition , 2005, The American Naturalist.

[41]  Felix Naef,et al.  Freedom and Rules: The Acquisition and Reprogramming of a Bird's Learned Song , 2005, Science.

[42]  M. Low Female weight predicts the timing of forced copulation attempts in stitchbirds, Notiomystis cincta , 2004, Animal Behaviour.

[43]  Johannes Schul,et al.  Phonotaxis in Hyla versicolor (Anura, Hylidae): the effect of absolute call amplitude , 2004, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[44]  Myriam E. Mermoz,et al.  Group Copulation Solicitation Display among Female Greater Rheas , 2003 .

[45]  A. King,et al.  Female Cowbird Song Perception: Evidence for Plasticity of Preference , 2003 .

[46]  A. King,et al.  Female proximity stimulates development of male competition in juvenile brown-headed cowbirds, Molothrus ater , 2003, Animal Behaviour.

[47]  G. Ball,et al.  Immediate early gene response to hearing song correlates with receptive behavior and depends on dialect in a female songbird , 2003, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[48]  S. I. Rothstein,et al.  East and west coast female brown-headed cowbirds agree: both categories of male song are sexy , 2002, Animal Behaviour.

[49]  Daniel J Mennill,et al.  Female eavesdropping on male song contests in songbirds. , 2002, Science.

[50]  R. C. Eaton,et al.  The Mauthner cell and other identified neurons of the brainstem escape network of fish , 2001, Progress in Neurobiology.

[51]  Andrew P. King,et al.  A role of her own: female cowbirds, Molothrus ater, influence the development and outcome of song learning , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[52]  M. D. Beecher,et al.  Mate, neighbour and stranger songs: a female song sparrow perspective , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[53]  F Goller,et al.  The neuromuscular control of birdsong. , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[54]  G. Leboucher,et al.  Effects of fadrozole on sexual displays and reproductive activity in the female canary , 1998, Physiology & Behavior.

[55]  M. Gahr,et al.  The selectivity of sexual responses to song displays: effects of partial chemical lesion of the HVC in female canaries , 1998, Behavioural Brain Research.

[56]  P. Verrell,et al.  Variance in male mating success and female choice for persuasive courtship displays , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[57]  M. Kreutzer,et al.  Adult female domesticated canaries can modify their song preferences , 1997 .

[58]  M. D. Beecher,et al.  Sexual preferences for mate song types in female song sparrows , 1997, Animal Behaviour.

[59]  Jeffrey Podos,et al.  A PERFORMANCE CONSTRAINT ON THE EVOLUTION OF TRILLED VOCALIZATIONS IN A SONGBIRD FAMILY (PASSERIFORMES: EMBERIZIDAE) , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[60]  M. C. Baker,et al.  A Catalog of Song Syllables of Indigo and Lazuli Buntings , 1995 .

[61]  M. Kreutzer,et al.  Female canaries are sexually responsive to special song phrases , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[62]  P. Slater,et al.  Bird Song: Biological Themes and Variations , 1995 .

[63]  S. I. Rothstein,et al.  Culturally correct song dialects are correlated with male age and female song preferences in wild populations of brown-headed cowbirds , 1995, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[64]  B. Sheldon,et al.  Copulation behavior and paternity in the chaffinch , 1994, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[65]  B. L. Roberts Neural mechanisms underlying escape behaviour in fishes , 1992, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[66]  D. W. Scott Multivariate Density Estimation: Theory, Practice, and Visualization , 1992, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[67]  D. W. Scott,et al.  Multivariate Density Estimation, Theory, Practice and Visualization , 1992 .

[68]  M. Kreutzer,et al.  Sexual responses of female canaries at the onset of song stimuli , 1992, Experientia.

[69]  M. Cheng For whom does the female dove coo? A case for the role of vocal self-stimulation , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[70]  Donald E. Kroodsma,et al.  The Function(s) of Bird Song , 1991 .

[71]  Eliot A. Brenowitz Altered perception of species-specific song by female birds after lesions of a forebrain nucleus. , 1991, Science.

[72]  L. Real Search Theory and Mate Choice. I. Models of Single-Sex Discrimination , 1990, The American Naturalist.

[73]  A. King,et al.  Vocalizations of juvenile cowbirds (Molothrus ater ater) evoke copulatory responses from females. , 1988, Developmental psychobiology.

[74]  A. King,et al.  Female visual displays affect the development of male song in the cowbird , 1988, Nature.

[75]  R. Weisman,et al.  Phrase order recognition by brown-headed cowbirds , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[76]  M. C. Baker,et al.  Sexual display response of female white-crowned sparrows to normal, isolate and modified conspecific songs , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[77]  S. I. Rothstein,et al.  Vocal Dialects and Their Possible Relation to Honest Status Signalling in the Brown-Headed Cowbird , 1987 .

[78]  A. King,et al.  Patterns of courtship between cowbird subspecies: evidence for positive assortment , 1985, Animal Behaviour.

[79]  Robert C. Eaton,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Startle Behavior , 1984 .

[80]  William A. Searcy,et al.  Song repertoire size and female preferences in song sparrows , 1984, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[81]  A. King,et al.  Female perception of cowbird song: a closed developmental program. , 1983, Developmental psychobiology.

[82]  A. King,et al.  Dissecting Cowbird Song Potency: Assessing a Song's Geographic Identity and Relative Appeal , 1983 .

[83]  D. Hoss,et al.  Startle Response in Herring: The Effect of Sound Stimulus Frequency, Size of Fish and Selective Interference With The Acoustico-Lateralis System , 1981, Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.

[84]  D. deCatanzaro,et al.  Antagonism of estrogen-induced lordosis by corticosterone in adrenalectomized-ovariectomized female rats and mice , 1981, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

[85]  P. Marler,et al.  A Test for Responsiveness to Song Structure and Programming in Female Sparrows , 1981, Science.

[86]  R. Noble The sexual responses of the female hamster: A descriptive analysis , 1979, Physiology & Behavior.

[87]  J. Staddon,et al.  A bioassay of isolate cowbird song. , 1979 .

[88]  A. King,et al.  Species identification in the North American cowbird: appropriate responses to abnormal song. , 1977, Science.

[89]  Lawrence M. Dill,et al.  The escape response of the zebra danio (Brachydanio rerio) I. The stimulus for escape , 1974 .

[90]  F. S. Russell,et al.  Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , 1982, Nature.

[91]  J. King,et al.  Testosterone-Induced Singing in Female White-Crowned Sparrows , 1972 .

[92]  J. Debold,et al.  Effects of coital stimulation upon behavior of the female rat. , 1972, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[93]  J. Debold,et al.  The relationship between levels of exogenous hormones and the display of lordosis by the female rat. , 1971 .

[94]  Donald Laming,et al.  Information theory of choice-reaction times , 1968 .

[95]  R. Hinde,et al.  Advances in the study of behavior , 1966 .

[96]  P. Marler,et al.  Behaviour of the chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs) , 1956 .

[97]  Meredith,et al.  A Bioassay of Isolate Cowbird , 2018 .

[98]  D. White,et al.  Male cowbirds vary the attractiveness of courtship songs with changes in the social context , 2018 .

[99]  S. I. Rothstein,et al.  The Brown-Headed Cowbird: A Model Species for Testing Novel Research Questions in Animal Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior , 2017 .

[100]  D. White A social ethological perspective applied to care of and research on songbirds. , 2010, ILAR journal.

[101]  Skipper Seabold,et al.  Statsmodels: Econometric and Statistical Modeling with Python , 2010, SciPy.

[102]  K. Riebel Chapter 6 Song and Female Mate Choice in Zebra Finches: A Review , 2009 .

[103]  Morgan Quigley,et al.  ROS: an open-source Robot Operating System , 2009, ICRA 2009.

[104]  K. Lorenz Über die Bildung des Instinktbegriffes , 2005, Naturwissenschaften.

[105]  K. Riebel The “Mute” Sex Revisited: Vocal Production and Perception Learning in Female Songbirds , 2003 .

[106]  F. Mckinney,et al.  Sexual Coercion in Waterfowl and Other Birds , 1998 .

[107]  W. Searcy,et al.  Estradiol dosage and the solicitation display assay in red-winged blackbirds , 1997 .

[108]  Linda M. Wills,et al.  Reverse Engineering , 1996, Springer US.

[109]  A. King,et al.  The Cowbird: Reflections on Development from an Unlikely Source , 1981 .

[110]  D. Pfaff,et al.  Dorsal root recording relevant for mating reflexes in female rats: identification of receptive fields and effects of peripheral denervation. , 1975, Journal of neurobiology.

[111]  Desmond Morris,et al.  The Feather Postures of Birds and the Problem of the Origin of Social Signals , 1956 .

[112]  J. M. Cattell,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF THE INTENSITY OF THE STIMULUS ON THE LENGTH OF THE REACTION TIME , 1886 .

[113]  R. Meldola Sexual Selection , 1871, Nature.