CytoConverter: a web-based tool to convert karyotypes to genomic coordinates

BackgroundCytogenetic nomenclature is used to describe chromosomal aberrations (or lack thereof) in a collection of cells, referred to as the cells’ karyotype. The nomenclature identifies locations on chromosomes using a system of cytogenetic bands, each with a unique name and region on a chromosome. Each band is microscopically visible after staining, and encompasses a large portion of the chromosome. More modern analyses employ genomic coordinates, which precisely specify a chromosomal location according to its distance from the end of the chromosome. Currently, there is no tool to convert cytogenetic nomenclature into genomic coordinates. Since locations of genes and other genomic features are usually specified by genomic coordinates, a conversion tool will facilitate the identification of the features that are harbored in the regions of chromosomal gain and loss that are implied by a karyotype.ResultsOur tool, termed CytoConverter, takes as input either a single karyotype or a file consisting of multiple karyotypes from several individuals. All net chromosomal gains and losses implied by the karyotype are returned in standard genomic coordinates, along with the numbers of cells harboring each aberration if included in the input. CytoConverter also returns graphical output detailing areas of gains and losses of chromosomes and chromosomal segments.ConclusionsCytoConverter is available as a web-based application at https://jxw773.shinyapps.io/Cytogenetic__software/ and as an R script at https://sourceforge.net/projects/cytoconverter/. Supplemental Material detailing the underlying algorithms is available.

[1]  Lisa G Shaffer,et al.  The Application of Clinical Genetics Dovepress Disorders Caused by Chromosome Abnormalities , 2022 .

[2]  M. Ferguson-Smith.  History and evolution of cytogenetics , 2015, Molecular Cytogenetics.

[3]  Jason M. Sheltzer,et al.  Systematic identification of mutations and copy number alterations associated with cancer patient prognosis , 2018, eLife.

[4]  M. Schmid,et al.  ISCN 2016: An International System for Human Cytogenomic Nomenclature (2016) , 2016 .

[5]  Benjamin E. Gross,et al.  The cBio cancer genomics portal: an open platform for exploring multidimensional cancer genomics data. , 2012, Cancer discovery.

[6]  T. LaFramboise,et al.  Single nucleotide polymorphism arrays: a decade of biological, computational and technological advances , 2009, Nucleic acids research.

[7]  Adam A. Margolin,et al.  The Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia enables predictive modeling of anticancer drug sensitivity , 2012, Nature.

[8]  Benjamin E. Gross,et al.  Integrative Analysis of Complex Cancer Genomics and Clinical Profiles Using the cBioPortal , 2013, Science Signaling.

[9]  Iscn.  International System for Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature , 1978 .

[10]  Francine E. Garrett-Bakelman,et al.  Distinct evolution and dynamics of epigenetic and genetic heterogeneity in acute myeloid leukemia , 2016, Nature Medicine.

[11]  Derek Y. Chiang,et al.  The landscape of somatic copy-number alteration across human cancers , 2010, Nature.

[12]  Y. Pawitan,et al.  Human genetics and genomics a decade after the release of the draft sequence of the human genome , 2011, Human Genomics.

[13]  Hilde van der Togt,et al.  Publisher's Note , 2003, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[14]  Xin Zhou,et al.  Pan-cancer genome and transcriptome analyses of 1,699 pediatric leukemias and solid tumors , 2018, Nature.

[15]  Bernhard Hiller,et al.  CyDAS: a cytogenetic data analysis system , 2005, Bioinform..