Come Together, Right Now: Dynamic Overwriting of an Object's History through Common Fate

The objects around us constantly move and interact, and the perceptual system needs to monitor on-line these interactions and to update the object's status accordingly. Gestalt grouping principles, such as proximity and common fate, play a fundamental role in how we perceive and group these objects. Here, we investigated situations in which the initial object representation as a separate item was updated by a subsequent Gestalt grouping cue (i.e., proximity or common fate). We used a version of the color change detection paradigm, in which the objects started to move separately, then met and stayed stationary, or moved separately, met, and then continued to move together. We monitored the object representations on-line using the contralateral delay activity (CDA; an ERP component indicative of the number of maintained objects), during their movement, and after the objects disappeared and became working memory representations. The results demonstrated that the objects' representations (as indicated by the CDA amplitude) persisted as being separate, even after a Gestalt proximity cue (when the objects “met” and remained stationary on the same position). Only a strong common fate Gestalt cue (when the objects not just met but also moved together) was able to override the objects' initial separate status, creating an integrated representation. These results challenge the view that Gestalt principles cause reflexive grouping. Instead, the object initial representation plays an important role that can override even powerful grouping cues.

[1]  A. Treisman,et al.  Binding in short-term visual memory. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[2]  E. Vogel,et al.  Neural Measures of Individual Differences in Selecting and Tracking Multiple Moving Objects , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  Marvin M Chun,et al.  Spatiotemporal object continuity in human ventral visual cortex , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Thomas Töllner,et al.  Searching for targets in visual working memory: investigating a dimensional feature bundle (DFB) model , 2015, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[5]  J. R. Pomerantz,et al.  A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: II. Conceptual and theoretical foundations. , 2012, Psychological bulletin.

[6]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Delineating the Neural Signatures of Tracking Spatial Position and Working Memory during Attentive Tracking , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Dwight J. Peterson,et al.  Contralateral delay activity tracks the influence of Gestalt grouping principles on active visual working memory representations , 2015, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[8]  J. Duncan Selective attention and the organization of visual information. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[9]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature binding, attention and object perception. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[10]  R. Luria,et al.  Integration of Distinct Objects in Visual Working Memory Depends on Strong Objecthood Cues Even for Different-Dimension Conjunctions. , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  B. Scholl Objects and attention: the state of the art , 2001, Cognition.

[12]  Jonathan I. Flombaum,et al.  A temporal same-object advantage in the tunnel effect: facilitated change detection for persisting objects. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Andrew Hollingworth,et al.  Binding objects to locations: the relationship between object files and visual working memory. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  Yaoda Xu,et al.  Visual grouping in human parietal cortex , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  B. Scholl Object Persistence in Philosophy and Psychology , 2007 .

[16]  Dirk Kerzel,et al.  Perceptual grouping allows for attention to cover noncontiguous locations and suppress capture from nearby locations. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Geoffrey F Woodman,et al.  Perceptual organization influences visual working memory , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  E. Vogel,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article Visual Working Memory Represents a Fixed Number of Items Regardless of Complexity , 2022 .

[19]  Ashleigh M. Richard,et al.  Understanding the function of visual short-term memory: transsaccadic memory, object correspondence, and gaze correction. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[20]  Roy Luria,et al.  The number of objects determines visual working memory capacity allocation for complex items , 2015, NeuroImage.

[21]  S. Luck,et al.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory , 2008, Nature.

[22]  E. Vogel,et al.  Shape and color conjunction stimuli are represented as bound objects in visual working memory , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  G. Alvarez,et al.  Space and time, not surface features, guide object persistence , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  How object-specific are object files? Evidence for integration by location. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  Neural Measures of Dynamic Changes in Attentive Tracking Load , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  H. Egeth,et al.  Perception without attention: evidence of grouping under conditions of inattention. , 1997, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[27]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[28]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[29]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity , 2004, Nature.

[30]  E. Vogel,et al.  Discrete capacity limits in visual working memory , 2010, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[31]  S. Palmer,et al.  A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization. , 2012, Psychological bulletin.

[32]  Maria Alejandra Gonzalez-Perez,et al.  Conceptual and Theoretical Foundations , 2014 .

[33]  Charles Spence,et al.  To what extent do Gestalt grouping principles influence tactile perception? , 2011, Psychological bulletin.

[34]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  Shape and color conjunction stimuli are represented as bound objects in visual working memory , 2011 .