Detection of Violations of the Law of Pendulum Motion: Observers' Sensitivity to the Relation Between Period and Length

Newtonian mechanics show that the period of a freely swinging pendulum is proportional to the square root of its length. Subjects' use of this relationship in perceiving the naturalness of motion was tested by presenting displays with periods physically correct, too short, or too long for the lengths of the pendulums. Sensitivity to violations of the length-period relationship was assessed by col- lecting ratings of the perceived naturalness of the motion. Deviations as small as .I to .2 sec were detected. The numerical ratings, however, varied widely among subjects and revealed a tendency to perceive physically correct motion as some- what more rapid than natural, The salience of violations of the length-period relationship was tested in a free response task asking subjects to comment on the appearance of the displays. Large deviations drew moderate numbers of observa- tions of the unnaturalness of the motion and a few statements about the percep- tion of forces acting on the pendulum. These comments sho...

[1]  J. B. Pittenger,et al.  The perception of human growth. , 1980, Scientific American.

[2]  J T Todd,et al.  Visual Perception of Relative Mass in Dynamic Events , 1982, Perception.

[3]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[4]  L. McDermott,et al.  Investigation of student understanding of the concept of velocity in one dimension , 1980 .

[5]  M T Turvey,et al.  Haptically perceiving the distances reachable with hand-held objects. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  S. Runeson The distorted room illusion, equivalent configurations, and the specificity of static optic arrays. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  J. Pittenger,et al.  Estimation of Pendulum Length from Information in Motion , 1985, Perception.

[8]  D. Proffitt,et al.  Understanding natural dynamics. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  J. Clement Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics , 1982 .

[10]  G. Johansson Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis , 1973 .

[11]  W H Warren,et al.  The Way the Ball Bounces: Visual and Auditory Perception of Elasticity and Control of the Bounce Pass , 1987, Perception.

[12]  David N. Lee,et al.  Plummeting gannets: a paradigm of ecological optics , 1981, Nature.

[13]  David N. Lee,et al.  Visual Timing in Hitting An Accelerating Ball , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[14]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[15]  J. Dauben Georg Cantor and the Origins of Transfinite Set Theory , 1983 .

[16]  James E. Cutting,et al.  Blowing in the wind: Perceiving structure in trees and bushes , 1982, Cognition.

[17]  W Schiff,et al.  Information Used in Judging Impending Collision , 1979, Perception.