Dynamic Decision Making: Implications for Recommender System Design

We make decisions in increasingly complex, high-risk, and dynamic environments that evolve over time in unpredictable ways, and the options that we have available in our daily decisions has exponentially increased. For example, when shopping in a store the item diversity on the shelves are large, menus in the restaurants offer large variety, books to select from in the bookstore are large, etc. We are living a choice explosion era. Even more dramatic is the choice explosion in the cyber-world. Given no physical storage restrictions, the options to choose from in the cyber world is immense. More than ever before, these situations challenge our cognitive abilities to process information and to make accurate decisions. How do we choose from this large diversity of options and how do we decide which ones best match our preferences? In the physical world, we may get advice from people we know: experts, friends and family, or we may get help and support from technology such as while driving relying on a GPS. In the cyber world, we now rely on recommender systems that help to filter the large amounts of information and to reduce possible decision options by predicting preferences of a decision maker and offering best possible alternatives. Recommender systems vary in their approach and ways in which individual preferences are collected and the way in which information and alternatives are filtered for particular users. However, ultimately, all recommender systems aim at predicting human preferences and choice and the essence of every recommender system is the human decision making process. Furthermore, because human preferences are not static, recommender algorithms must be dynamic and adaptable to changes. Often preferences are constructed through past experience (choices and outcomes observed in the past) and through explicit information provided. These characteristics suggest that human preferences are dynamic and contingent to the decision environment. I suggest that Dynamic Decision Making (DDM) research may help to build recommender systems that learn and adapt recommendations dynamically and to a particular user's experience, to maximize benefits and overall utility of her choices. I present a conceptual framework for dynamic decision making that is different from the traditional view of choice in the behavioral sciences, summarize main behavioral results obtained from experimental studies in dynamic situations; and summarize a theory and a computational model that has demonstrated accuracy in predicting human choice in a large diversity of tasks, which may provide an …

[1]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  Learning to Make Decisions in Dynamic Environments: Effects of Time Constraints and Cognitive Abilities , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[2]  Joachim Funke,et al.  Using Simulation to Study Complex Problem Solving , 1988 .

[3]  R. Hogarth Insights in Decision Making , 1990 .

[4]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  The use of microworlds to study dynamic decision making , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[5]  J. Sterman Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decision making , 1989 .

[6]  R. Hertwig,et al.  The description–experience gap in risky choice , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  Ward Edwards,et al.  Dynamic Decision Theory and Probabilistic Information Processings1 , 1962 .

[8]  R. Hogarth Beyond discrete biases: Functional and dysfunctional aspects of judgmental heuristics. , 1981 .

[9]  D. Norman,et al.  New technology and human error , 1989 .

[10]  Johanna Helena Kerstholt,et al.  The effect of time pressure on decision-making behaviour in a dynamic task environment , 1994 .

[11]  Kinneret Teodorescu,et al.  Learned Helplessness and Learned Prevalence , 2014, Psychological science.

[12]  Varun Dutt,et al.  Instance-based learning: integrating sampling and repeated decisions from experience. , 2011, Psychological review.

[13]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  Instance-based learning in dynamic decision making , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[14]  Cleotilde Gonzalez Learning to Make Decisions in Dynamic Environments: ACT-R Plays the Beer Game , 2004, ICCM.

[15]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  The boundaries of instance-based learning theory for explaining decisions from experience. , 2013, Progress in brain research.

[16]  P. Frensch,et al.  Complex problem solving : the European perspective , 1995 .

[17]  I. Erev,et al.  Small feedback‐based decisions and their limited correspondence to description‐based decisions , 2003 .

[18]  C. Lebiere,et al.  Instance-Based Cognitive Models of Decision-Making , 2005 .

[19]  Tarek F. Abdelzaher,et al.  Dynamics of human trust in recommender systems , 2014, RecSys '14.

[20]  Amnon Rapoport,et al.  RESEARCH PARADIGMS FOR STUDYING DYNAMIC DECISION BEHAVIOR , 1975 .

[21]  Alice F. Healy,et al.  A cognitive modeling account of simultaneous learning and fatigue effects , 2011, Cognitive Systems Research.

[22]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  Preparing for Novelty with Diverse Training , 2011 .

[23]  B. Brehmer,et al.  Experiments with computer-simulated microworlds: Escaping both the narrow straits of the laboratory and the deep blue sea of the field study , 1993 .

[24]  Cleotilde González,et al.  Diversity during training enhances detection of novel stimuli , 2011 .

[25]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  Adaptive Technologies for Training and Education: Training Decisions from Experience with Decision-Making Games , 2012 .

[26]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  Instance-based Learning Models of Training , 2010 .

[27]  Michael K. Martin,et al.  Instance-Based Decision Making Model of Repeated Binary Choice , 2007 .

[28]  O. Svenson,et al.  Decision making : cognitive models and explanations , 1997 .

[29]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  Refuting data aggregation arguments and how the IBL model stands criticism: A reply to Hills and Hertwig (2012) , 2012 .

[30]  Dietrich Doerner,et al.  On the Difficulties People Have in Dealing With Complexity , 1980 .

[31]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  A Loser Can Be a Winner: Comparison of Two Instance-based Learning Models in a Market Entry Competition , 2011, Games.

[32]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  Instance‐based Learning: A General Model of Repeated Binary Choice , 2012 .

[33]  I. Erev,et al.  On adaptation, maximization, and reinforcement learning among cognitive strategies. , 2005, Psychological review.

[34]  Cleotilde González Decision Support for Real-Time, Dynamic Decision-Making Tasks , 2005 .

[35]  Berndt Brehmer,et al.  Reliability and validity of performance measures in microworlds , 2002 .

[36]  David J. Weiss,et al.  Dynamic Decision Theory and Probabilistic Information Processing , 2008 .

[37]  B. Brehmer Dynamic decision making: human control of complex systems. , 1992, Acta psychologica.

[38]  Jeroen G. W. Raaijmakers,et al.  Decision making in dynamic task environments , 1997 .

[39]  Robert W. Proctor,et al.  An Instance-Based Learning Model of Stimulus-Response Compatibility Effects in Mixed Location-Relevant and Location-Irrelevant Tasks , 2009 .

[40]  R. Hertwig,et al.  Decisions from Experience and the Effect of Rare Events in Risky Choice , 2004, Psychological science.