Sharing Space: The Presence of Other Bodies Extends the Space Judged as Near

Background As social animals we share the space with other people. It is known that perceived extension of the peripersonal space (the reaching space) is affected by the implicit representation of our own and other's action potentialities. Our issue concerns whether the co-presence of a body in the scene influences our extrapersonal space (beyond reaching distance) categorization. Methodology/Principal Findings We investigated, through 3D virtual scenes of a realistic environment, whether egocentric spatial categorization can be influenced by the presence of another human body (Exp. 1) and whether the effect is due to her action potentialities or simply to her human-like morphology (Exp. 2). Subjects were asked to judge the location ("Near" or "Far") of a target object located at different distances from their egocentric perspective. In Exp. 1, the judgment was given either in presence of a virtual avatar (Self-with-Other), or a non-corporeal object (Self-with-Object) or nothing (Self). In Exp. 2, the Self condition was replaced by a Self-with-Dummy condition, in which an inanimate body (a wooden dummy) was present. Mean Judgment Transition Thresholds (JTTs) were calculated for each subject in each experimental condition. Self-with-Other condition induced a significant extension of the space judged as “Near” as compared to both the Self-with-Object condition and the Self condition. Such extension was observed also in Exp. 2 in the Self-with-Dummy condition. Results suggest that the presence of others impacts on our perception of extrapersonal space. This effect holds also when the other is a human-like wooden dummy, suggesting that structural and morphological shapes resembling human bodies are sufficient conditions for the effect to occur. Conclusions The observed extension of the portion of space judged as near could represent a wider portion of “accessible” space, thus an advantage in the struggle to survive in presence of other potential competing individuals.

[1]  T. Poggio,et al.  Cognitive neuroscience: Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[2]  F. Durgin,et al.  Sugar and space? Not the case: Effects of low blood glucose on slant estimation are mediated by beliefs , 2013, i-Perception.

[3]  Christian Keysers,et al.  The anthropomorphic brain: The mirror neuron system responds to human and robotic actions , 2007, NeuroImage.

[4]  D. Kemmerer The semantics of space: Integrating linguistic typology and cognitive neuroscience , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  W. Epstein,et al.  Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Jeanine K. Stefanucci,et al.  The Role of Effort in Perceiving Distance , 2003, Psychological science.

[7]  Michel Chambon,et al.  Embodied perception with others? bodies in mind: Stereotype priming influence on the perception of spatial environment , 2009 .

[8]  Alain Berthoz,et al.  Multiple reference frames used by the human brain for spatial perception and memory , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[9]  R. Andersen,et al.  Intentional maps in posterior parietal cortex. , 2002, Annual review of neuroscience.

[10]  Peter Willemsen,et al.  The Influence of Restricted Viewing Conditions on Egocentric Distance Perception: Implications for Real and Virtual Indoor Environments , 2005, Perception.

[11]  Shana Cole,et al.  Visual perception and regulatory conflict: motivation and physiology influence distance perception. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  M. Goodale,et al.  Two visual systems re-viewed , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  Jack M. Loomis,et al.  Visual perception of egocentric distance in real and virtual environments. , 2003 .

[14]  Jeanine K. Stefanucci,et al.  The effects of handedness and reachability on perceived distance. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Sarah H. Creem-Regehr,et al.  Perceiving virtual geographical slant: action influences perception. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  Yann Coello,et al.  Embodiment, spatial categorisation and action , 2007, Consciousness and Cognition.

[17]  Jessica K. Witt,et al.  An older view on distance perception: older adults perceive walkable extents as farther , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  C. Frith,et al.  Social cognition in the we-mode , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  V. Gallese,et al.  Tool-use observation makes far objects ready-to-hand , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[20]  Fred H. Previc,et al.  The Neuropsychology of 3-D Space , 1998 .

[21]  James E. Cutting,et al.  Chapter 3 – Perceiving Layout and Knowing Distances: The Integration, Relative Potency, and Contextual Use of Different Information about Depth* , 1995 .

[22]  V. Gallese,et al.  Objects and their nouns in peripersonal space , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  Giorgia Committeri,et al.  Ready Both to Your and to My Hands: Mapping the Action Space of Others , 2011, PloS one.

[24]  O. Grüsser,et al.  Multimodal Structure of the Extrapersonal Space , 1983 .

[25]  G. Committeri,et al.  Social scaling of extrapersonal space: Target objects are judged as closer when the reference frame is a human agent with available movement potentialities , 2015, Cognition.

[26]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Human Body , 2001 .

[27]  G. Orban,et al.  Observing Others: Multiple Action Representation in the Frontal Lobe , 2005, Science.

[28]  D. Proffitt Embodied Perception and the Economy of Action , 2006, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[29]  Sally A. Linkenauger,et al.  Perception viewed as a phenotypic expression , 2013 .

[30]  R. Andersen,et al.  Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements. , 1997, Annual review of neuroscience.

[31]  V. Ramachandran,et al.  The human mirror neuron system: a link between action observation and social skills. , 2007, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[32]  M. Goodale,et al.  Ventral occipital lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: an fMRI study. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  J. Witt Action’s Effect on Perception , 2011 .

[34]  D. Proffitt,et al.  Visual-motor recalibration in geographical slant perception. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  D. Proffitt,et al.  Action-specific influences on distance perception: a role for motor simulation. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  G. Gescheider Psychophysics: The Fundamentals , 1997 .

[37]  Jonathan R. Zadra,et al.  Direct Evidence for the Economy of Action: Glucose and the Perception of Geographical Slant , 2010, Perception.

[38]  W. Epstein,et al.  Perceiving Distance: A Role of Effort and Intent , 2004, Perception.

[39]  Vilayanur S. Ramachandran,et al.  EEG evidence for mirror neuron activity during the observation of human and robot actions: Toward an analysis of the human qualities of interactive robots , 2007, Neurocomputing.

[40]  Gaetano Tieri,et al.  Where does an object trigger an action? An investigation about affordances in space , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  James R. Brockmole,et al.  Watch this! Observed tool use affects perceived distance , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[42]  Marcello Costantini,et al.  Grasping affordances with the other's hand: a TMS study. , 2013, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[43]  F. Previc The neuropsychology of 3-D space. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[44]  G Rizzolatti,et al.  The Space Around Us , 1997, Science.