Image information and visual quality

Measurement of visual quality is of fundamental importance to numerous image and video processing applications. The goal of quality assessment (QA) research is to design algorithms that can automatically assess the quality of images or videos in a perceptually consistent manner. Image QA algorithms generally interpret image quality as fidelity or similarity with a "reference" or "perfect" image in some perceptual space. Such "full-reference" QA methods attempt to achieve consistency in quality prediction by modeling salient physiological and psychovisual features of the human visual system (HVS), or by signal fidelity measures. In this paper, we approach the image QA problem as an information fidelity problem. Specifically, we propose to quantify the loss of image information to the distortion process and explore the relationship between image information and visual quality. QA systems are invariably involved with judging the visual quality of "natural" images and videos that are meant for "human consumption." Researchers have developed sophisticated models to capture the statistics of such natural signals. Using these models, we previously presented an information fidelity criterion for image QA that related image quality with the amount of information shared between a reference and a distorted image. In this paper, we propose an image information measure that quantifies the information that is present in the reference image and how much of this reference information can be extracted from the distorted image. Combining these two quantities, we propose a visual information fidelity measure for image QA. We validate the performance of our algorithm with an extensive subjective study involving 779 images and show that our method outperforms recent state-of-the-art image QA algorithms by a sizeable margin in our simulations. The code and the data from the subjective study are available at the LIVE website.

[1]  Scott J. Daly,et al.  Visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[2]  Jerome M. Shapiro,et al.  Embedded image coding using zerotrees of wavelet coefficients , 1993, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[3]  Andrew B. Watson,et al.  DCTune: A TECHNIQUE FOR VISUAL OPTIMIZATION OF DCT QUANTIZATION MATRICES FOR INDIVIDUAL IMAGES. , 1993 .

[4]  Patrick C. Teo,et al.  Perceptual image distortion , 1994, Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Image Processing.

[5]  Patrick C. Teo,et al.  A model of perceptual image fidelity , 1995, Proceedings., International Conference on Image Processing.

[6]  Paul S. Fisher,et al.  Image quality measures and their performance , 1995, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[7]  Jean-Bernard Martens,et al.  Quality asessment of coded images using numerical category scaling , 1995, Other Conferences.

[8]  William T. Freeman,et al.  Presented at: 2nd Annual IEEE International Conference on Image , 1995 .

[9]  Jeffrey Lubin,et al.  A VISUAL DISCRIMINATION MODEL FOR IMAGING SYSTEM DESIGN AND EVALUATION , 1995 .

[10]  William A. Pearlman,et al.  A new, fast, and efficient image codec based on set partitioning in hierarchical trees , 1996, IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. Video Technol..

[11]  Andrew P. Bradley,et al.  Perceptual quality metrics applied to still image compression , 1998, Signal Process..

[12]  Andrew P. Bradley,et al.  A wavelet visible difference predictor , 1999, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[13]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image compression via joint statistical characterization in the wavelet domain , 1999, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[14]  Stefan Winkler,et al.  Issues in vision modeling for perceptual video quality assessment , 1999, Signal Process..

[15]  Eero P. Simoncelli Modeling the joint statistics of images in the wavelet domain , 1999, Optics & Photonics.

[16]  Pascual Capilla,et al.  Image quality metric based on multidimensional contrast perception models , 1999 .

[17]  Kannan Ramchandran,et al.  Low-complexity image denoising based on statistical modeling of wavelet coefficients , 1999, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[18]  C.-C. Jay Kuo,et al.  A Haar Wavelet Approach to Compressed Image Quality Measurement , 2000, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[19]  Stefan Winkler,et al.  Video Quality Experts Group: current results and future directions , 2000, Visual Communications and Image Processing.

[20]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image denoising using a local Gaussian scale mixture model in the wavelet domain , 2000, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[21]  Joseph W. Goodman,et al.  A mathematical analysis of the DCT coefficient distributions for images , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[22]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Random Cascades on Wavelet Trees and Their Use in Analyzing and Modeling Natural Images , 2001 .

[23]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural image statistics and neural representation. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[24]  Justin K. Romberg,et al.  Bayesian tree-structured image modeling using wavelet-domain hidden Markov models , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[25]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  Multiscale image segmentation using wavelet-domain hidden Markov models , 2001, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[26]  Bülent Sankur,et al.  Statistical evaluation of image quality measures , 2002, J. Electronic Imaging.

[27]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  41 OBJECTIVE VIDEO QUALITY ASSESSMENT , 2003 .

[28]  Martin J. Wainwright,et al.  Image denoising using scale mixtures of Gaussians in the wavelet domain , 2003, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[29]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Image Quality Assessment: From Error Measurement to Structural Similarity , 2004 .

[30]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  On Advances in Statistical Modeling of Natural Images , 2004, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[31]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  A Parametric Texture Model Based on Joint Statistics of Complex Wavelet Coefficients , 2000, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[32]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Image information and visual quality , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[33]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[34]  Gustavo de Veciana,et al.  An information fidelity criterion for image quality assessment using natural scene statistics , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[35]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  No-reference quality assessment using natural scene statistics: JPEG2000 , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[36]  Thrasyvoulos N. Pappas,et al.  Perceptual criteria for image quality evaluation , 2005 .