A Characterization of the Top Trading Cycles Mechanism for the School Choice Problem

Abstract This paper characterizes the top trading cycles mechanism for the school choice problem. Schools may have multiple available seats to be assigned to students. For each school a strict priority ordering of students is determined by the school district. Each student has strict preference over the schools. We first define weaker forms of fairness, consistency and resource monotonicity. We show that the top trading cycles mechanism is the unique Pareto efficient and strategy-proof mechanism that satisfies the weaker forms of fairness, consistency and resource monotonicity. To our knowledge this is the first axiomatic approach to the top trading cycles mechanism in the school choice problem where schools have a capacity greater than one.

[1]  T. Morrill An alternative characterization of top trading cycles , 2013 .

[2]  Parag A. Pathak,et al.  The Mechanism Design Approach to Student Assignment , 2011 .

[3]  Atila Abdulkadiro Generalized Matching for School Choice , 2011 .

[4]  M. Utku Ünver,et al.  The 'Boston' School-Choice Mechanism , 2010 .

[5]  Tayfun Sönmez,et al.  House Allocation with Existing Tenants: A Characterization , 2006, Games Econ. Behav..

[6]  Yeon-Koo Che,et al.  The Role of Priorities in Assigning Indivisible Objects : A Characterization of Top Trading Cycles , 2010 .

[7]  Parag A. Pathak,et al.  Strategy-Proofness versus Efficiency in Matching with Indifferences: Redesigning the NYC High School Match , 2009 .

[8]  Onur Kesten,et al.  Coalitional strategy-proofness and resource monotonicity for house allocation problems , 2009, Int. J. Game Theory.

[9]  Onur Kesten,et al.  On two competing mechanisms for priority-based allocation problems , 2006, J. Econ. Theory.

[10]  Bettina Klaus,et al.  Resource-monotonicity for house allocation problems , 2004, Int. J. Game Theory.

[11]  Atila Abdulkadiroglu,et al.  School Choice: A Mechanism Design Approach , 2003 .

[12]  H. Ergin Consistency in house allocation problems , 2000 .

[13]  Atila Abdulkadiroglu,et al.  HOUSE ALLOCATION WITH EXISTING TENANTS , 1999 .

[14]  M. Balinski,et al.  A Tale of Two Mechanisms: Student Placement , 1999 .

[15]  José Alcalde,et al.  Top dominance and the possibility of strategy-proof stable solutions to matching problems , 1994 .

[16]  W. Thomson The Consistency Principle , 1989 .

[17]  William Thomson,et al.  Monotonicity properties of bargaining solutions when applied to economics , 1988 .

[18]  L. Shapley,et al.  On cores and indivisibility , 1974 .