Encoding of Complexity, Shape, and Curvature by Macaque Infero-Temporal Neurons
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] R. Vogels. Categorization of complex visual images by rhesus monkeys. Part 1: behavioural study , 1999, The European journal of neuroscience.
[2] L. Gool,et al. Minimal information to determine affine shape equivalence. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[3] Mark W. Pettet. PII: S0042-6989(98)00130-8 , 1998 .
[4] R. Henson,et al. Multiple levels of visual object constancy revealed by event-related fMRI of repetition priming , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.
[5] Gunter Loffler,et al. Perception of contours and shapes: Low and intermediate stage mechanisms , 2008, Vision Research.
[6] Johan Wagemans,et al. The effect of category learning on the representation of shape: dimensions can be biased but not differentiated. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[7] J. Hochberg,et al. A quantitative approach to figural "goodness". , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.
[8] I. Biederman. Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.
[9] David G. Lowe,et al. The viewpoint consistency constraint , 2015, International Journal of Computer Vision.
[10] Keiji Tanaka. Columns for complex visual object features in the inferotemporal cortex: clustering of cells with similar but slightly different stimulus selectivities. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.
[11] D. B. Bender,et al. Visual properties of neurons in inferotemporal cortex of the Macaque. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.
[12] R. Vogels,et al. Properties of shape tuning of macaque inferior temporal neurons examined using rapid serial visual presentation. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.
[13] R. Vogels,et al. Effects of Category Learning on the Stimulus Selectivity of Macaque References , 2022 .
[14] P. Schiller,et al. Quantitative studies of single-cell properties in monkey striate cortex. I. Spatiotemporal organization of receptive fields. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.
[15] M. Bar,et al. Humans Prefer Curved Visual Objects , 2006, Psychological science.
[16] Suzanne P. McKee,et al. Constraints on long range interactions mediating contour detection , 1998, Vision Research.
[17] J Wagemans,et al. Perceptual use of nonaccidental properties. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.
[18] R. Vogels. Categorization of complex visual images by rhesus monkeys. Part 2: single‐cell study , 1999, The European journal of neuroscience.
[19] Patrick Dupont,et al. Human Brain Regions Involved in Visual Categorization , 2002, NeuroImage.
[20] Irving Biederman,et al. One-shot viewpoint invariance in matching novel objects , 1999, Vision Research.
[21] D. Field,et al. The role of “contrast enhancement” in the detection and appearance of visual contours , 1998, Vision Research.
[22] I. Biederman,et al. Inferior Temporal Neurons Show Greater Sensitivity to Nonaccidental than to Metric Shape Differences , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[23] S F Chipman,et al. Complexity and structure in visual patterns. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[24] R. Desimone,et al. Shape recognition and inferior temporal neurons. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[25] J. M. Vanderplas,et al. Complexity, association value, and practice as factors in shape recognition following paired associates training. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.
[26] Johan Wagemans,et al. Delayed shape matching benefits from simplicity and symmetry , 2009, Vision Research.
[27] Charles E Connor,et al. Underlying principles of visual shape selectivity in posterior inferotemporal cortex , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.
[28] Peter Medawar. Transformation of shape , 1950, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B - Biological Sciences.
[29] Johan Wagemans,et al. The influence of orientation jitter and motion on contour saliency and object identification , 2009, Vision Research.
[30] N. Sigala,et al. Visual categorization shapes feature selectivity in the primate temporal cortex , 2002, Nature.
[31] Leon O. Chua. THRESHOLD OF COMPLEXITY , 2006 .
[32] Joachim M. Buhmann,et al. Distortion Invariant Object Recognition in the Dynamic Link Architecture , 1993, IEEE Trans. Computers.
[33] I. Biederman,et al. Tuning for shape dimensions in macaque inferior temporal cortex , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.
[34] I. Biederman,et al. Representation of regular and irregular shapes in macaque inferotemporal cortex. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.
[35] Claus Bundesen,et al. Visual pattern matching: Effects of size ratio, complexity, and similarity in simultaneous and successive matching , 1999 .
[36] David J. Field,et al. Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field” , 1993, Vision Research.
[37] Johan Wagemans,et al. Identification of everyday objects on the basis of Gaborized outline versions , 2010, i-Perception.
[38] W. Epstein,et al. The status of the minimum principle in the theoretical analysis of visual perception. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.
[39] S. Edelman,et al. Representation of object similarity in human vision: psychophysics and a computational model , 1998, Vision Research.
[40] Johan Wagemans,et al. Identification of Everyday Objects on the Basis of Fragmented Outline Versions , 2008, Perception.
[41] Richard N Aslin,et al. Bayesian learning of visual chunks by human observers , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[42] Keiji Tanaka,et al. Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. , 1996, Annual review of neuroscience.
[43] I Kovács,et al. A closed curve is much more than an incomplete one: effect of closure in figure-ground segmentation. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[44] F. Attneave. Some informational aspects of visual perception. , 1954, Psychological review.
[45] Gunter Loffler,et al. Local and global contributions to shape discrimination , 2003, Vision Research.
[46] M. Young,et al. Sparse population coding of faces in the inferotemporal cortex. , 1992, Science.
[47] Donald D. Hoffman,et al. Codon constraints on closed 2D shapes , 1985, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..
[48] I. Biederman,et al. Shape Tuning in Macaque Inferior Temporal Cortex , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[49] Robert L. Goldstone. Unitization during category learning. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[50] D. Perkins,et al. How Good a Bet is Good Form? , 1976, Perception.
[51] R N Shepard,et al. Multidimensional Scaling, Tree-Fitting, and Clustering , 1980, Science.
[52] R. Aslin,et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article UNSUPERVISED STATISTICAL LEARNING OF HIGHER-ORDER SPATIAL STRUCTURES FROM VISUAL SCENES , 2022 .
[53] E. Leeuwenberg,et al. Goodness of visual regularities: a nontransformational approach. , 1996, Psychological review.
[54] M. Behrmann,et al. Impact of learning on representation of parts and wholes in monkey inferotemporal cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.
[55] David J. Freedman,et al. A Comparison of Primate Prefrontal and Inferior Temporal Cortices during Visual Categorization , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[56] J. Pellegrino,et al. Stimulus complexity effects in visual comparisons: the effects of practice and learning context. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[57] Anitha Pasupathy,et al. Transformation of shape information in the ventral pathway , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
[58] David G. Lowe,et al. Three-Dimensional Object Recognition from Single Two-Dimensional Images , 1987, Artif. Intell..
[59] Ravi S. Menon,et al. Differential Effects of Viewpoint on Object-Driven Activation in Dorsal and Ventral Streams , 2002, Neuron.
[60] Johan Wagemans,et al. Contour-based object identification and segmentation: Stimuli, norms and data, and software tools , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.
[61] S. Edelman,et al. Differential Processing of Objects under Various Viewing Conditions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 1999, Neuron.
[62] F. Attneave,et al. The determination of perceived tridimensional orientation by minimum criteria , 1969 .
[63] E. Leeuwenberg. Quantitative specification of information in sequential patterns. , 1969, Psychological review.
[64] G. Orban,et al. Selectivity for 3D shape that reveals distinct areas within macaque inferior temporal cortex. , 2000, Science.
[65] T. Poggio,et al. Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.
[66] N. Logothetis,et al. View-dependent object recognition by monkeys , 1994, Current Biology.
[67] I. Biederman,et al. Recognizing depth-rotated objects: evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[68] Shawn W. Ell,et al. The neurobiology of human category learning , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[69] R. Vogels,et al. Inferotemporal neurons represent low-dimensional configurations of parameterized shapes , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.
[70] Johan Wagemans,et al. Integration of contour and surface information in shape detection , 2011, Vision Research.
[71] Steven C. Dakin,et al. Absence of contour linking in peripheral vision , 1997, Nature.