Organization of intrinsic functional brain connectivity predicts decisions to reciprocate social behavior

Reciprocation of trust exchanges is central to the development of interpersonal relationships and societal well-being. Understanding how humans make pro-social and self-centered decisions in dyadic interactions and how to predict these choices has been an area of great interest in social neuroscience. A functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) based technology with potential clinical application is the study of resting state brain connectivity. We tested if resting state connectivity may predict choice behavior in a social context. Twenty-nine healthy adults underwent resting state fMRI before performing the Trust Game, a two person monetary exchange game. We assessed the ability of patterns of resting-state functional brain organization, demographic characteristics and a measure of moral development, the Defining Issues Test (DIT-2), to predict individuals' decisions to reciprocate money during the Trust Game. Subjects reciprocated in 74.9% of the trials. Independent component analysis identified canonical resting-state networks. Increased functional connectivity between the salience (bilateral insula/anterior cingulate) and central executive (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex/ posterior parietal cortex) networks significantly predicted the choice to reciprocate pro-social behavior (R(2) = 0.20, p = 0.015). Stepwise linear regression analysis showed that functional connectivity between these two networks (p = 0.002), age (p = 0.007) and DIT-2 personal interest schema score (p = 0.032) significantly predicted reciprocity behavior (R(2) = 0.498, p = 0.001). Intrinsic functional connectivity between neural networks in conjunction with other individual characteristics may be a valuable tool for predicting performance during social interactions. Future replication and temporal extension of these findings may bolster the understanding of decision making in clinical, financial and marketing settings.

[1]  Emily B. Falk,et al.  Predicting Persuasion-Induced Behavior Change from the Brain , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Stephen J. Thoma,et al.  DIT2: Devising and testing a revised instrument of moral judgment. , 1999, Journal of Educational Psychology.

[3]  Antonio Rangel,et al.  Neural Activity Reveals Preferences Without Choices , 2013, American economic journal. Microeconomics.

[4]  C. Kilts,et al.  Mode of Effective Connectivity within a Putative Neural Network Differentiates Moral Cognitions Related to Care and Justice Ethics , 2011, PloS one.

[5]  J. Gamboa,et al.  Gender-Specific Effects of Depression and Suicidal Ideation in Prosocial Behaviors , 2014, PloS one.

[6]  J. Duncan The Structure of Cognition: Attentional Episodes in Mind and Brain , 2013, Neuron.

[7]  L. DeBruine Facial resemblance enhances trust , 2002, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  Ivanei E. Bramati,et al.  The Neural Correlates of Moral Sensitivity: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation of Basic and Moral Emotions , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  G. Glover,et al.  Dissociable Intrinsic Connectivity Networks for Salience Processing and Executive Control , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[10]  R. Buckner,et al.  Self-projection and the brain , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  Thomas Baumgartner,et al.  Article the Neural Circuitry of a Broken Promise , 2022 .

[12]  S. Quartz,et al.  Getting to Know You: Reputation and Trust in a Two-Person Economic Exchange , 2005, Science.

[13]  Luca Chittaro,et al.  Brain activity and prosocial behavior in a simulated life-threatening situation , 2014, NeuroImage.

[14]  T. Heatherton,et al.  Individual Differences in Nucleus Accumbens Activity to Food and Sexual Images Predict Weight Gain and Sexual Behavior , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  A. Sanfey,et al.  Friend or foe: The effect of implicit trustworthiness judgments in social decision-making , 2008, Cognition.

[16]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment , 2001, Science.

[17]  Diane E. Stodola,et al.  Compassion Training Alters Altruism and Neural Responses to Suffering , 2013, Psychological science.

[18]  D. Perrett,et al.  Valid Facial Cues to Cooperation and Trust , 2010, Psychological science.

[19]  R. Nathan Spreng,et al.  The Common Neural Basis of Autobiographical Memory, Prospection, Navigation, Theory of Mind, and the Default Mode: A Quantitative Meta-analysis , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Joseph Newman,et al.  Altered Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Cortical Networks in Psychopathy , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  Daniel Houser,et al.  A functional imaging study of cooperation in two-person reciprocal exchange , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  M. Gazzaniga,et al.  Neuroprediction of future rearrest , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  Kai Fehse,et al.  Compassion, guilt and innocence: An fMRI study of responses to victims who are responsible for their fate , 2015, Social neuroscience.

[24]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  Consistency of Network Modules in Resting-State fMRI Connectome Data , 2012, PloS one.