An introduction to cognitive modeling

We provide a tutorial on the basic attributes of computational cognitive models—models that are formulated as a set of mathematical equations or as a computer simulation. We first show how models can generate complex behavior and novel insights from very simple underlying assumptions about human cognition. We survey the different classes of models, from description to explanation, and present examples of each class. We then illustrate the reasons why computational models are preferable to purely verbal means of theorizing. For example, we show that computational models help theoreticians overcome the limitations of human cognition, thereby enabling us to create coherent and plausible accounts of how we think or remember and guard against subtle theoretical errors. Models can also measure latent constructs and link them to individual differences, which would escape detection if only the raw data were considered. We conclude by reviewing some open challenges.

[1]  H. Pashler,et al.  Editors’ Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[2]  Jonathan S. Evans,et al.  Bias in human reasoning , 1990 .

[3]  S. Lewandowsky The Rewards and Hazards of Computer Simulations , 1993 .

[4]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Using the ACT-R Cognitive Architecture in Combination With fMRI Data , 2015 .

[5]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Reflections of the Environment in Memory Form of the Memory Functions , 2022 .

[6]  W T Maddox,et al.  Comparing decision bound and exemplar models of categorization , 1993, Perception & psychophysics.

[7]  Andrea Stocco,et al.  The cognitive modeling of human behavior: Why a model is (sometimes) better than 10,000 words , 2007, Cognitive Systems Research.

[8]  Brad J. Sagarin,et al.  Managing social norms for persuasive impact , 2006 .

[9]  Jonathan E. Butner,et al.  Dynamical evolutionary psychology: individual decision rules and emergent social norms. , 2003, Psychological review.

[10]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Striatum and pre-SMA facilitate decision-making under time pressure , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  R. Nosofsky Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  C. Welzel,et al.  Development, Freedom, and Rising Happiness: A Global Perspective (1981–2007) , 2008, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[13]  M. Kalish,et al.  Working memory does not dissociate between different perceptual categorization tasks. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  D. Gentner,et al.  Flowing waters or teeming crowds: Mental models of electricity , 1982 .

[15]  David M. Riefer,et al.  Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[16]  Eric-Jan Wagenmakers,et al.  An EZ-diffusion model for response time and accuracy , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  Gordon D Logan,et al.  An instance theory of attention and memory. , 2002, Psychological review.

[18]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Forgetting in memory models: Arguments against trace decay and consolidation failure. , 2010 .

[19]  M. Frank,et al.  Dopaminergic Genes Predict Individual Differences in Susceptibility to Confirmation Bias , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  F. Gregory Ashby,et al.  Multidimensional Models of Perception and Cognition , 2014 .

[21]  I. J. Myung,et al.  Toward an explanation of the power law artifact: Insights from response surface analysis , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[22]  J. Kruschke,et al.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. , 1992, Psychological review.

[23]  S. Lewandowsky Working memory capacity and categorization: individual differences and modeling. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  John R Anderson,et al.  Using a model to compute the optimal schedule of practice. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[25]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms , 2007, Psychological science.

[26]  A. Baddeley,et al.  Amnesia and the distinction between long- and short-term memory. , 1970 .

[27]  Scott D. Brown,et al.  The power law repealed: The case for an exponential law of practice , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  R. Luce,et al.  Four tensions concerning mathematical modeling in psychology. , 1995, Annual review of psychology.

[29]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  SIMPLE: Further Applications of A Local Distinctiveness Model of Memory , 2006 .

[30]  M. McDaniel,et al.  The conceptual basis of function learning and extrapolation: Comparison of rule-based and associative-based models , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[31]  Allan Collins,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing , 1975 .

[32]  B. Latané Dynamic Social Impact: The Creation of Culture by Communication. , 1996 .

[33]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  Whichever way you Choose to Categorize, Working Memory Helps you Learn , 2012, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  M. Lee,et al.  Hierarchical diffusion models for two-choice response times. , 2011, Psychological methods.

[35]  S C McKinley,et al.  Investigations of exemplar and decision bound models in large, ill-defined category structures. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Does activation really spread , 1981 .

[37]  John R. Anderson,et al.  A Production System Theory of Serial Memory , 1997 .

[38]  J. Wixted,et al.  Testing signal-detection models of yes/no and two-alternative forced-choice recognition memory. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[39]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Practice and Forgetting Effects on Vocabulary Memory: An Activation-Based Model of the Spacing Effect , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[40]  G. Logan Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[41]  Simon Farrell,et al.  End Anchoring in Short-Term Order Memory. , 2009 .

[42]  John R. Anderson A spreading activation theory of memory. , 1983 .

[43]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  A controlled-attention view of working-memory capacity. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[44]  John R. Anderson ACT: A simple theory of complex cognition. , 1996 .

[45]  J. Townsend Mathematical Psychology: Prospects For The 21 Century: A Guest Editorial. , 2008, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[46]  Simon Farrell,et al.  Models of cognition and constraints from neuroscience: A case study involving consolidation , 2012 .

[47]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  Social influence: compliance and conformity. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[48]  P. Muter,et al.  Very rapid forgetting , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[49]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Individual differences in components of reaction time distributions and their relations to working memory and intelligence. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[50]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  Amnesia, rehearsal, and temporal distinctiveness models of recall , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[51]  Philip L. Smith,et al.  A comparison of sequential sampling models for two-choice reaction time. , 2004, Psychological review.

[52]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Comparing categorization models. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[53]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  A hierarchical model for estimating response time distributions , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[54]  Simon Farrell,et al.  Computational Modeling in Cognition: Principles and Practice , 2010 .

[55]  R. Shepard,et al.  Learning and memorization of classifications. , 1961 .

[56]  Marci S. DeCaro,et al.  Individual differences in category learning: Sometimes less working memory capacity is better than more , 2008, Cognition.