Neural correlates underlying the effect of reward value on recognition memory

The prioritized encoding and retrieval of valuable information is an essential aspect of human memory. We used electroencephalography (EEG) to determine which of two hypothesized processes underlies the influence of reward value on episodic memory. One hypothesis is that value engages prefrontal executive control processes, so that valuable stimuli engage an elaborative rehearsal strategy that benefits memory. A second hypothesis is that value acts through the reward-related midbrain dopamine system to modulate synaptic plasticity in hippocampal and cortical efferents, thereby benefiting memory encoding. We used a value-directed recognition memory (VDR) paradigm in which participants encoded words assigned different point values and aimed to maximize the point value of subsequently recognized words. Subjective states of recollection (i.e., "remember") and familiarity (i.e., "know") were assessed at retrieval. Words assigned higher values at study were recognized more effectively than words assigned lower values, due to increased "remember" responses but no difference in "know" responses. Greater value was also associated with larger amplitudes of an EEG component at retrieval that indexes recollection (parietal old/new component), but had no relationship with a component that indexes familiarity (FN400 component). During encoding, we assessed a late frontal positivity (frontal slow wave, FSW) that has been related to elaborative rehearsal strategies and an early parietal component (P3) thought to index dopamine driven attention allocation. Our findings indicate that the effect of value on recognition memory is primarily driven by the dopamine-driven reward valuation system (P3) with no discernible effect on rehearsal processes (FSW).

[1]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Imaging valuation models in human choice. , 2006, Annual review of neuroscience.

[2]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  On the Control of Control: The Role of Dopamine in Regulating Prefrontal Function and Working Memory , 2007 .

[3]  W. S. Peavler,et al.  Incentive effects and pupillary changes in association learning. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  R. Heuser Surprise, surprise , 2014, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[5]  E. Tulving,et al.  Event-related brain potential correlates of two states of conscious awareness in memory. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  H. Heinze,et al.  Reward-related fMRI activation of dopaminergic midbrain is associated with enhanced hippocampus-dependent long-term memory formation , 2005 .

[7]  Samuel M. McClure,et al.  A computational substrate for incentive salience , 2003, Trends in Neurosciences.

[8]  R. E. Martin Event-related potential studies of outcome processing and feedback-guided learning , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[9]  Nash Unsworth,et al.  Working memory capacity, strategic allocation of study time, and value-directed remembering , 2017 .

[10]  Andrew P. Yonelinas,et al.  Examining ERP correlates of recognition memory: Evidence of accurate source recognition without recollection , 2012, NeuroImage.

[11]  Nelson Cowan,et al.  Processing limits of selective attention and working memory: Potential implications for interpreting , 2000 .

[12]  Michael Friendly,et al.  The Toronto Word Pool: Norms for imagery, concreteness, orthographic variables, and grammatical usage for 1,080 words , 1982 .

[13]  L. I. O'kelly,et al.  Retention of nonsense syllables learned under different degrees of motivation. , 1949, The Journal of psychology.

[14]  C D Wickens,et al.  Processing of stimulus properties: evidence for dual-task integrality. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Atsushi Sato,et al.  Effects of value and reward magnitude on feedback negativity and P300 , 2005, Neuroreport.

[16]  J. Polich Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[17]  A. Wagman Event-related Brain Potentials in Man , 1981 .

[18]  J. Wixted Dual-process theory and signal-detection theory of recognition memory. , 2007, Psychological review.

[19]  Barbara J Knowlton,et al.  Value-based modulation of memory encoding involves strategic engagement of fronto-temporal semantic processing regions , 2014, Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience.

[20]  D. Shohamy,et al.  Dopamine and adaptive memory , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  E Donchin,et al.  Effects of mnemonic strategy manipulation in a Von Restorff paradigm. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[22]  H G Smid,et al.  ERPs to encoding and recognition in two different inter‐item association tasks , 1997, Neuroreport.

[23]  R. Blair,et al.  An alternative method for significance testing of waveform difference potentials. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[24]  E. Tulving Memory and consciousness. , 1985 .

[25]  E. Donchin,et al.  Performance of concurrent tasks: a psychophysiological analysis of the reciprocity of information-processing resources. , 1983, Science.

[26]  E. Donchin,et al.  “P300” and memory: Individual differences in the von Restorff effect , 1984, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  M. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and recognition memory , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  A. Yonelinas The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research , 2002 .

[29]  Alison R. Preston,et al.  Reward Modulation of Hippocampal Subfield Activation during Successful Associative Encoding and Retrieval , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  S. Haber,et al.  The Reward Circuit: Linking Primate Anatomy and Human Imaging , 2010, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[31]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[32]  Gene A. Brewer,et al.  Divided Attention Selectively Impairs Value-Directed Encoding , 2019, Collabra: Psychology.

[33]  Alan D. Castel,et al.  The Adaptive and Strategic Use of Memory By Older Adults: Evaluative Processing and Value-Directed Remembering , 2007 .

[34]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[35]  Barbara J. Knowlton,et al.  Effects of aging on value-directed modulation of semantic network activity during verbal learning , 2016, NeuroImage.

[36]  D. Broadbent Perception and communication , 1958 .

[37]  Tim Curran,et al.  Experts’ memory: an ERP study of perceptual expertise effects on encoding and recognition , 2011, Memory & cognition.

[38]  Matthias J. Gruber,et al.  Post-learning Hippocampal Dynamics Promote Preferential Retention of Rewarding Events , 2016, Neuron.

[39]  Claus Lamm,et al.  P300 amplitude variation is related to ventral striatum BOLD response during gain and loss anticipation: An EEG and fMRI experiment , 2014, NeuroImage.

[40]  T. Wickens,et al.  Effect of incentive on storage and retrieval processes , 1970 .

[41]  Ryuta Kawashima,et al.  Remembering with Gains and Losses: Effects of Monetary Reward and Punishment on Successful Encoding Activation of Source Memories , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  Brian Knutson,et al.  Reward-Motivated Learning: Mesolimbic Activation Precedes Memory Formation , 2006, Neuron.

[43]  E. Donchin Presidential address, 1980. Surprise!...Surprise? , 1981, Psychophysiology.

[44]  J. Lisman,et al.  The Hippocampal-VTA Loop: Controlling the Entry of Information into Long-Term Memory , 2005, Neuron.

[45]  Mariano Sigman,et al.  CUDAICA: GPU Optimization of Infomax-ICA EEG Analysis , 2012, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[46]  G. Mandler Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. , 1980 .

[47]  Thomas D. Sambrook,et al.  Mediofrontal event-related potentials in response to positive, negative and unsigned prediction errors , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  Barbara J Knowlton,et al.  Recognizing What Matters: Value Improves Recognition by Selectively Enhancing Recollection. , 2017, Journal of memory and language.

[49]  Aaron S Benjamin,et al.  The effects of aging on selectivity and control in short-term recall , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[50]  E. Donchin,et al.  P300 and tracking difficulty: evidence for multiple resources in dual-task performance. , 1980, Psychophysiology.

[51]  E. Donchin,et al.  P300 and recall in an incidental memory paradigm. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[52]  Peter Dayan,et al.  A Neural Substrate of Prediction and Reward , 1997, Science.

[53]  B. Weiner,et al.  Motivational factors in short-term retention. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[54]  T W Picton,et al.  Attention and successful episodic encoding: an event-related potential study. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[55]  Hiroki R. Hayama,et al.  Electrophysiological dissociation of the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity , 2006, Brain Research.

[56]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Learning from experience: Event-related potential correlates of reward processing, neural adaptation, and behavioral choice , 2012, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[57]  Barbara J Knowlton,et al.  Free Recall Test Experience Potentiates Strategy-Driven Effects of Value on Memory , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[58]  C. Berridge,et al.  The locus coeruleus–noradrenergic system: modulation of behavioral state and state-dependent cognitive processes , 2003, Brain Research Reviews.

[59]  Gene A. Brewer,et al.  Free recall dynamics in value-directed remembering , 2018, Journal of Memory and Language.

[60]  E. Donchin,et al.  COGNITIVE PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY: THE ENDOGENOUS COMPONENTS OF THE ERP , 1978 .

[61]  Matthias J. Gruber,et al.  Voluntary Control over Prestimulus Activity Related to Encoding , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[62]  W. Pritchard Psychophysiology of P300. , 1981, Psychological bulletin.