Deadeye: A Novel Preattentive Visualization Technique Based on Dichoptic Presentation

Preattentive visual features such as hue or flickering can effectively draw attention to an object of interest – for instance, an important feature in a scientific visualization. These features appear to pop out and can be recognized by our visual system, independently from the number of distractors. Most cues do not take advantage of the fact that most humans have two eyes. In cases where binocular vision is applied, it is almost exclusively used to convey depth by exposing stereo pairs. We present Deadeye, a novel preattentive visualization technique based on presenting different stimuli to each eye. The target object is rendered for one eye only and is instantly detected by our visual system. In contrast to existing cues, Deadeye does not modify any visual properties of the target and, thus, is particularly suited for visualization applications. Our evaluation confirms that Deadeye is indeed perceived preattentively. We also explore a conjunction search based on our technique and show that, in contrast to 3D depth, the task cannot be processed in parallel.

[1]  Adam Finkelstein,et al.  Directing gaze in 3D models with stylized focus , 2006, EGSR '06.

[2]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[3]  A. L. Yarbus,et al.  Eye Movements and Vision , 1967, Springer US.

[4]  L. Zhaoping Attention capture by eye of origin singletons even without awareness--a hallmark of a bottom-up saliency map in the primary visual cortex. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[5]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Five factors that guide attention in visual search , 2017, Nature Human Behaviour.

[6]  Xiang Cao,et al.  Beyond stereo: an exploration of unconventional binocular presentation for novel visual experience , 2012, CHI.

[7]  Inna Tsirlin,et al.  da Vinci decoded: does da Vinci stereopsis rely on disparity? , 2012, Journal of vision.

[8]  C. Koch,et al.  Computational modelling of visual attention , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[9]  Christopher G. Healey,et al.  Visualizing data with motion , 2005, VIS 05. IEEE Visualization, 2005..

[10]  Daniel H. Baker,et al.  Decoding eye-of-origin outside of awareness , 2017, NeuroImage.

[11]  E. Galanter,et al.  Brightnesses, luminances, and Fechner’s paradox , 1967 .

[12]  Maic Masuch,et al.  Formalizing the potential of stereoscopic 3D user experience in interactive entertainment , 2015, Electronic Imaging.

[13]  Colin Ware,et al.  Information Visualization: Perception for Design , 2000 .

[14]  D Marr,et al.  A computational theory of human stereo vision. , 1979, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[15]  S. Anstis,et al.  Nonlinear combination of luminance excursions during flicker, simultaneous contrast, afterimages and binocular fusion , 1998, Vision Research.

[16]  Benjamin T. Backus,et al.  Stereoscopic Offset Makes Objects Easier to Recognize , 2015, PloS one.

[17]  L. Stark,et al.  Scanpaths in saccadic eye movements while viewing and recognizing patterns. , 1971, Vision research.

[18]  Laurie M. Wilcox,et al.  The role of monocularly visible regions in depth and surface perception , 2009, Vision Research.

[19]  Ivan Viola,et al.  Attractive Flicker — Guiding Attention in Dynamic Narrative Visualizations , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[20]  A. O'Toole,et al.  On the preattentive accessibility of stereoscopic disparity: Evidence from visual search , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  Jonas Schild,et al.  Deep Gaming - The Creative and Technological Potential of Stereoscopic 3D Vision for Interactive Entertainment , 2014 .

[22]  D Marr,et al.  Cooperative computation of stereo disparity. , 1976, Science.

[23]  J. Friedenberg Visual Attention and Consciousness , 2012 .

[24]  Harold Pashler,et al.  A Boolean map theory of visual attention. , 2007, Psychological review.

[25]  A. L. I︠A︡rbus Eye Movements and Vision , 1967 .

[26]  S. Coren,et al.  The dominant eye. , 1976, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Da vinci stereopsis: Depth and subjective occluding contours from unpaired image points , 1990, Vision Research.

[28]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions , 1986, Nature.

[29]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[30]  C. D. Weert,et al.  Binocular brightness combinations: Additive and nonadditive aspects , 1974 .

[31]  Jon Driver,et al.  Visual search for a conjunction of movement and form is parallel , 1988, Nature.

[32]  C. Paffen,et al.  Interocular conflict attracts attention , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[33]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[34]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Sensitivity To Three-Dimensional Orientation in Visual Search , 1990 .

[35]  B. Julesz Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions , 1981, Nature.

[36]  The magnitude of stereopsis in peripheral visual fields , 2012 .

[37]  C. Clifford Binocular rivalry , 2009, Current Biology.

[38]  J. Townsend Serial vs. Parallel Processing: Sometimes They Look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and Should) be Distinguished , 1990 .

[39]  J. D. Mollon,et al.  The psychophysics of detecting binocular discrepancies of luminance , 2009, Vision Research.

[40]  Haimo Zhang Spectacularly Binocular: Exploiting Binocular Luster Effects for HCI Applications , 2015 .

[41]  Tobias Höllerer,et al.  Stereoscopic Highlighting: 2D Graph Visualization on Stereo Displays , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[42]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Binocularity and visual search , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  Ching-Yu Cheng,et al.  Association of ocular dominance and anisometropic myopia. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[44]  A. Treisman,et al.  Illusory words: the roles of attention and of top-down constraints in conjoining letters to form words. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  A. Nagy,et al.  Critical color differences determined with a visual search task. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[46]  Kyle Wm. Hall,et al.  Formalizing Emphasis in Information Visualization , 2016, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[47]  Allison Woodruff,et al.  Popout prism: adding perceptual principles to overview+detail document interfaces , 2002, CHI.

[48]  H. Müller,et al.  Visual search for conjunctions of motion and form : the efficiency of attention to static versus moving items depends on practice , 1999 .

[49]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[50]  A. L. Yarbus Eye Movements During Perception of Complex Objects , 1967 .

[51]  Ali Borji,et al.  State-of-the-Art in Visual Attention Modeling , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[52]  David A. Leopold,et al.  What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? , 1996, Nature.

[53]  R. Blake A neural theory of binocular rivalry. , 1989, Psychological review.

[54]  B. Julesz Binocular depth perception of computer-generated patterns , 1960 .

[55]  C. Paffen,et al.  A search asymmetry for interocular conflict , 2011, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[56]  Carl Gutwin,et al.  Peripheral Popout: The Influence of Visual Angle and Stimulus Intensity on Popout Effects , 2017, CHI.

[57]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Influence of scene-based properties on visual search. , 1990, Science.

[58]  W. Levelt On binocular rivalry , 1965 .

[59]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  Experiment 3 : A search asymmetry for luster Method , 2017 .

[60]  J. Pokorny Foundations of Cyclopean Perception , 1972 .

[61]  Patrick Baudisch,et al.  Evaluating visual cues for window switching on large screens , 2008, CHI.

[62]  James T. Enns,et al.  Attention and Visual Memory in Visualization and Computer Graphics , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.